From 30b6777b8931afc5f3aa42858fe917938b570f79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Swen Schillig Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:11:31 +0200 Subject: [SCSI] zfcp: Fix check whether unchained ct_els is possible A false check was performed whether an unchained ct_els is possible or not. Signed-off-by: Swen Schillig Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt Signed-off-by: James Bottomley --- drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c') diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c index 9ac6a6e4a604..4e15361a83b9 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c +++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_fsf.c @@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ static int zfcp_fsf_setup_ct_els_sbals(struct zfcp_fsf_req *req, } /* use single, unchained SBAL if it can hold the request */ - if (zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_req) || zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_resp)) { + if (zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_req) && zfcp_qdio_sg_one_sbale(sg_resp)) { zfcp_fsf_setup_ct_els_unchained(adapter->qdio, &req->qdio_req, sg_req, sg_resp); return 0; -- cgit v1.2.2