From f7d0b926ac8c8ec0c7a83ee69409bd2e6bb39f81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 15:43:22 -0700
Subject: mm: define USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS rather than repeating expression

Define USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS as a constant expression rather than repeating
"NR_CPUS >= CONFIG_SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS" all over the place.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 arch/x86/xen/mmu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'arch')

diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
index aa37469da696..2e1b64088490 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
@@ -646,7 +646,7 @@ static spinlock_t *lock_pte(struct page *page)
 {
 	spinlock_t *ptl = NULL;
 
-#if NR_CPUS >= CONFIG_SPLIT_PTLOCK_CPUS
+#if USE_SPLIT_PTLOCKS
 	ptl = __pte_lockptr(page);
 	spin_lock(ptl);
 #endif
-- 
cgit v1.2.2