From 28f223782bca914ae65d08234c57c2175ecd7f5d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Laurent Meyer Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:40:07 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] s390: alternate signal stack handling bug If a signal handler has been established with the SA_ONSTACK option but no alternate stack is provided with sigaltstack(), the kernel still tries to install the alternate stack. Also when setting an alternate stack with sigalstack() and the SS_DISABLE flag, the kernel tries to install the alternate stack on signal delivery. Use the correct conditions sas_ss_flags() to check if the alternate stack has to be used. Signed-off-by: Laurent Meyer Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- arch/s390/kernel/compat_signal.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch') diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/compat_signal.c b/arch/s390/kernel/compat_signal.c index 5291b5f8788d..b4c815d8ef75 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kernel/compat_signal.c +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/compat_signal.c @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ get_sigframe(struct k_sigaction *ka, struct pt_regs * regs, size_t frame_size) /* This is the X/Open sanctioned signal stack switching. */ if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_ONSTACK) { - if (! on_sig_stack(sp)) + if (! sas_ss_flags(sp)) sp = current->sas_ss_sp + current->sas_ss_size; } -- cgit v1.2.2