From 083044e63b4d10ebf9afb231bc0d34aec72169b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andi Kleen Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:49:24 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] x86-64: Remove disable_tsc code in context switch It only offers extremly dubious security advantages and is not worth the overhead in this critical path. Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c | 29 ----------------------------- 1 file changed, 29 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c') diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c index e9f35c60f8c6..687ed357e685 100644 --- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c @@ -486,33 +486,6 @@ out: return err; } -/* - * This function selects if the context switch from prev to next - * has to tweak the TSC disable bit in the cr4. - */ -static inline void disable_tsc(struct task_struct *prev_p, - struct task_struct *next_p) -{ - struct thread_info *prev, *next; - - /* - * gcc should eliminate the ->thread_info dereference if - * has_secure_computing returns 0 at compile time (SECCOMP=n). - */ - prev = prev_p->thread_info; - next = next_p->thread_info; - - if (has_secure_computing(prev) || has_secure_computing(next)) { - /* slow path here */ - if (has_secure_computing(prev) && - !has_secure_computing(next)) { - write_cr4(read_cr4() & ~X86_CR4_TSD); - } else if (!has_secure_computing(prev) && - has_secure_computing(next)) - write_cr4(read_cr4() | X86_CR4_TSD); - } -} - /* * This special macro can be used to load a debugging register */ @@ -631,8 +604,6 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev_p, struct task_struct * } } - disable_tsc(prev_p, next_p); - return prev_p; } -- cgit v1.2.2