From f1c5d30e1d79bbfb60eaf189db862d3cb2bcac92 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:50:33 -0700 Subject: x86: use X86_FEATURE_NOPL in alternatives Use X86_FEATURE_NOPL to determine if it is safe to use P6 NOPs in alternatives. Also, replace table and loop with simple if statement. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin --- arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 36 +++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel') diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c index 2763cb37b553..65a0c1b48696 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c @@ -145,35 +145,25 @@ static const unsigned char *const p6_nops[ASM_NOP_MAX+1] = { extern char __vsyscall_0; const unsigned char *const *find_nop_table(void) { - return boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_INTEL || - boot_cpu_data.x86 < 6 ? k8_nops : p6_nops; + if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL && + boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NOPL)) + return p6_nops; + else + return k8_nops; } #else /* CONFIG_X86_64 */ -static const struct nop { - int cpuid; - const unsigned char *const *noptable; -} noptypes[] = { - { X86_FEATURE_K8, k8_nops }, - { X86_FEATURE_K7, k7_nops }, - { X86_FEATURE_P4, p6_nops }, - { X86_FEATURE_P3, p6_nops }, - { -1, NULL } -}; - const unsigned char *const *find_nop_table(void) { - const unsigned char *const *noptable = intel_nops; - int i; - - for (i = 0; noptypes[i].cpuid >= 0; i++) { - if (boot_cpu_has(noptypes[i].cpuid)) { - noptable = noptypes[i].noptable; - break; - } - } - return noptable; + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_K8)) + return k8_nops; + else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_K7)) + return k7_nops; + else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_NOPL)) + return p6_nops; + else + return intel_nops; } #endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */ -- cgit v1.2.2