From a1c75cc5018f17ff6d80ce45a13435b1536f76db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ingo Molnar Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:50:26 +0200 Subject: x86, microcode rework, v2, fix based on patch from Dmitry Adamushko. - add missing vfree() - update debug printks Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c') diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c index 6815837a7753..48aec9f48e4f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static int get_matching_microcode(int cpu, void *mc, int rev) unsigned int i = 0; /* - * dimm: do we need this? Why an update via /dev/... is different + * FIXME! dimm: do we need this? Why an update via /dev/... is different * from the one via firmware? * * This is a tricky part. We might be called from a write operation @@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static void * get_next_ucode(u8 *buf, unsigned int size, return NULL; } - /* Why not by means of get_totalsize(hdr)? */ + /* FIXME! dimm: Why not by means of get_totalsize(hdr)? */ total_size = (unsigned long) (hdr[4] + (hdr[5] << 8)); printk(KERN_INFO "microcode: size %u, total_size %u\n", @@ -342,6 +342,8 @@ static int generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size, mc_header = (struct microcode_header_amd *)mc; if (get_matching_microcode(cpu, mc, new_rev)) { + if (new_mc) + vfree(new_mc); new_rev = mc_header->patch_id; new_mc = mc; } else -- cgit v1.2.2