From b8ae48656db860d4c83a29aa7b0588fc89361935 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hugh Dickins Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:08:46 -0800 Subject: [SPARC64] mm: don't re-evaluate *ptep sparc64 prom_callback and new_setup_frame32 each operates on a user page table without holding lock, and no doubt they've good reason. But I'd feel more confident if they were to do a "pte = *ptep" and then operate on pte, rather than re-evaluating *ptep. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- arch/sparc64/kernel/setup.c | 12 ++++++++---- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/sparc64/kernel/setup.c') diff --git a/arch/sparc64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/sparc64/kernel/setup.c index c1f34237cdf2..bf1849dd9c49 100644 --- a/arch/sparc64/kernel/setup.c +++ b/arch/sparc64/kernel/setup.c @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ int prom_callback(long *args) pud_t *pudp; pmd_t *pmdp; pte_t *ptep; + pte_t pte; for_each_process(p) { mm = p->mm; @@ -178,8 +179,9 @@ int prom_callback(long *args) * being called from inside OBP. */ ptep = pte_offset_map(pmdp, va); - if (pte_present(*ptep)) { - tte = pte_val(*ptep); + pte = *ptep; + if (pte_present(pte)) { + tte = pte_val(pte); res = PROM_TRUE; } pte_unmap(ptep); @@ -218,6 +220,7 @@ int prom_callback(long *args) pud_t *pudp; pmd_t *pmdp; pte_t *ptep; + pte_t pte; int error; if ((va >= LOW_OBP_ADDRESS) && (va < HI_OBP_ADDRESS)) { @@ -240,8 +243,9 @@ int prom_callback(long *args) * being called from inside OBP. */ ptep = pte_offset_kernel(pmdp, va); - if (pte_present(*ptep)) { - tte = pte_val(*ptep); + pte = *ptep; + if (pte_present(pte)) { + tte = pte_val(pte); res = PROM_TRUE; } goto done; -- cgit v1.2.2