From e1bbb55d11622012197a654af874f9f485ddbc47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Linus Walleij Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:10:36 +0200 Subject: ARM: ux500: reform Ux500 family names Counting the U9540 and the new U8540 as a U8500 family member does not work. Instead, split the function in two: cpu_is_u8500_family() covering U8500 and U8520 cpu_is_ux540_family() covering U9540 and U8540 This works much better in practice. Update users to keep the same behaviour. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij --- arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu.c') diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu.c b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu.c index e2360e7c770d..4b0a9b300312 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu.c @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ void __init ux500_init_irq(void) void __iomem *dist_base; void __iomem *cpu_base; - if (cpu_is_u8500_family()) { + if (cpu_is_u8500_family() || cpu_is_ux540_family()) { dist_base = __io_address(U8500_GIC_DIST_BASE); cpu_base = __io_address(U8500_GIC_CPU_BASE); } else -- cgit v1.2.2