From 166aaf396654b533f536f2cf84d7558eb42f1c9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Martin Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 16:58:39 +0100 Subject: ARM: 8029/1: mcpm: Rename the power_down_finish() functions to be less confusing The name "power_down_finish" seems to be causing some confusion, because it suggests that this function is responsible for taking some action to cause the specified CPU to complete its power down. This patch renames the affected functions to "wait_for_powerdown" and similar, since this function's intended purpose is just to wait for the hardware to finish a powerdown initiated by a previous cpu_power_down. Signed-off-by: Dave Martin Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre Signed-off-by: Russell King --- arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c | 6 +++--- arch/arm/common/mcpm_platsmp.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/arm/common') diff --git a/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c b/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c index 1e361abc29eb..7522c87e82fc 100644 --- a/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c +++ b/arch/arm/common/mcpm_entry.c @@ -101,14 +101,14 @@ void mcpm_cpu_power_down(void) BUG(); } -int mcpm_cpu_power_down_finish(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster) +int mcpm_wait_for_cpu_powerdown(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster) { int ret; - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!platform_ops || !platform_ops->power_down_finish)) + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!platform_ops || !platform_ops->wait_for_powerdown)) return -EUNATCH; - ret = platform_ops->power_down_finish(cpu, cluster); + ret = platform_ops->wait_for_powerdown(cpu, cluster); if (ret) pr_warn("%s: cpu %u, cluster %u failed to power down (%d)\n", __func__, cpu, cluster, ret); diff --git a/arch/arm/common/mcpm_platsmp.c b/arch/arm/common/mcpm_platsmp.c index 177251a4dd9a..92e54d7c6f46 100644 --- a/arch/arm/common/mcpm_platsmp.c +++ b/arch/arm/common/mcpm_platsmp.c @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ static int mcpm_cpu_kill(unsigned int cpu) cpu_to_pcpu(cpu, &pcpu, &pcluster); - return !mcpm_cpu_power_down_finish(pcpu, pcluster); + return !mcpm_wait_for_cpu_powerdown(pcpu, pcluster); } static int mcpm_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu) -- cgit v1.2.2 From 3f8517e7937d04ac7df9082c741fefc9c873065b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Pitre Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 22:31:44 +0100 Subject: ARM: 8063/1: bL_switcher: fix individual online status reporting of removed CPUs The content of /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/online is still 1 for those CPUs that the switcher has removed even though the global state in /sys/devices/system/cpu/online is updated correctly. It turns out that commit 0902a9044f ("Driver core: Use generic offline/online for CPU offline/online") has changed the way those files retrieve their content by relying on on the generic attribute handling code. The switcher, by calling cpu_down() directly, bypasses this handling and the attribute value doesn't get updated. Fix this by calling device_offline()/device_online() instead. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre Signed-off-by: Russell King --- arch/arm/common/bL_switcher.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/arm/common') diff --git a/arch/arm/common/bL_switcher.c b/arch/arm/common/bL_switcher.c index f01c0ee0c87e..490f3dced749 100644 --- a/arch/arm/common/bL_switcher.c +++ b/arch/arm/common/bL_switcher.c @@ -433,8 +433,12 @@ static void bL_switcher_restore_cpus(void) { int i; - for_each_cpu(i, &bL_switcher_removed_logical_cpus) - cpu_up(i); + for_each_cpu(i, &bL_switcher_removed_logical_cpus) { + struct device *cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(i); + int ret = device_online(cpu_dev); + if (ret) + dev_err(cpu_dev, "switcher: unable to restore CPU\n"); + } } static int bL_switcher_halve_cpus(void) @@ -521,7 +525,7 @@ static int bL_switcher_halve_cpus(void) continue; } - ret = cpu_down(i); + ret = device_offline(get_cpu_device(i)); if (ret) { bL_switcher_restore_cpus(); return ret; -- cgit v1.2.2