From c4ade94fc00f8b34589719d8a347f658b6d3951e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Li, Shaohua" Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:30:34 +0100 Subject: cfq-iosched: removing unnecessary think time checking Removing think time checking. A high thinktime queue might means the queue dispatches several requests and then do away. Limitting such queue seems meaningless. And also this can simplify code. This is suggested by Vivek. Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li Acked-by: Vivek Goyal Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/cfq-iosched.c | 13 ++++--------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c index fea1b5a9b7e9..7785169f3c8f 100644 --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c @@ -2417,19 +2417,14 @@ static bool cfq_may_dispatch(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq) return false; /* - * If there is only one sync queue, and its think time is - * small, we can ignore async queue here and give the sync + * If there is only one sync queue + * we can ignore async queue here and give the sync * queue no dispatch limit. The reason is a sync queue can * preempt async queue, limiting the sync queue doesn't make * sense. This is useful for aiostress test. */ - if (cfq_cfqq_sync(cfqq) && cfqd->busy_sync_queues == 1) { - struct cfq_io_context *cic = RQ_CIC(cfqq->next_rq); - - if (sample_valid(cic->ttime_samples) && - cic->ttime_mean < cfqd->cfq_slice_idle) - promote_sync = true; - } + if (cfq_cfqq_sync(cfqq) && cfqd->busy_sync_queues == 1) + promote_sync = true; /* * We have other queues, don't allow more IO from this one -- cgit v1.2.2