From 24179f488092267c9a033d7e25ce7a58af50ff79 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Teigland Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:13:33 -0600 Subject: dlm: fix plock notify callback to lockd We should use the original copy of the file_lock, fl, instead of the copy, flc in the lockd notify callback. The range in flc has been modified by posix_lock_file(), so it will not match a copy of the lock in lockd. Signed-off-by: David Teigland --- fs/dlm/plock.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/dlm/plock.c b/fs/dlm/plock.c index eba87ff3177b..502b1ea5ef6b 100644 --- a/fs/dlm/plock.c +++ b/fs/dlm/plock.c @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static int dlm_plock_callback(struct plock_op *op) notify = xop->callback; if (op->info.rv) { - notify(flc, NULL, op->info.rv); + notify(fl, NULL, op->info.rv); goto out; } @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ static int dlm_plock_callback(struct plock_op *op) (unsigned long long)op->info.number, file, fl); } - rv = notify(flc, NULL, 0); + rv = notify(fl, NULL, 0); if (rv) { /* XXX: We need to cancel the fs lock here: */ log_print("dlm_plock_callback: lock granted after lock request " -- cgit v1.2.2