aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* stackprotector: fix multi-word cross-buildsIngo Molnar2009-02-11
| | | | | | | | Stackprotector builds were failing if CROSS_COMPILER was more than a single world (such as when distcc was used) - because the check scripts used $1 instead of $*. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* stackprotector: update make rulesTejun Heo2009-02-09
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Impact: no default -fno-stack-protector if stackp is enabled, cleanup Stackprotector make rules had the following problems. * cc support test and warning are scattered across makefile and kernel/panic.c. * -fno-stack-protector was always added regardless of configuration. Update such that cc support test and warning are contained in makefile and -fno-stack-protector is added iff stackp is turned off. While at it, prepare for 32bit support. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* [PATCH] Add the -fstack-protector option to the CFLAGSArjan van de Ven2006-09-26
Add a feature check that checks that the gcc compiler has stack-protector support and has the bugfix for PR28281 to make this work in kernel mode. The easiest solution I could find was to have a shell script in scripts/ to do the detection; if needed we can make this fancier in the future without making the makefile too complex. Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> CC: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> CC: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>