aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/wimax/op-msg.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* wimax: document why wimax_msg_*() operations can be used in any stateInaky Perez-Gonzalez2009-05-28
| | | | | | | | Funcion documentation for wimax_msg_alloc() and wimax_msg_send() needs to clarify that they can be used in the very early stages of a wimax_dev lifecycle. Signed-off-by: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@linux.intel.com>
* wimax: fix oops if netlink fails to add attributeInaky Perez-Gonzalez2009-05-06
| | | | | | | | | When sending a message to user space using wimax_msg(), if nla_put() fails, correctly interpret the return code from wimax_msg_alloc() as an err ptr and return the error code instead of crashing (as it is assuming than non-NULL means the pointer is ok). Signed-off-by: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@linux.intel.com>
* netlink: change return-value logic of netlink_broadcast()Pablo Neira Ayuso2009-02-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently, netlink_broadcast() reports errors to the caller if no messages at all were delivered: 1) If, at least, one message has been delivered correctly, returns 0. 2) Otherwise, if no messages at all were delivered due to skb_clone() failure, return -ENOBUFS. 3) Otherwise, if there are no listeners, return -ESRCH. With this patch, the caller knows if the delivery of any of the messages to the listeners have failed: 1) If it fails to deliver any message (for whatever reason), return -ENOBUFS. 2) Otherwise, if all messages were delivered OK, returns 0. 3) Otherwise, if no listeners, return -ESRCH. In the current ctnetlink code and in Netfilter in general, we can add reliable logging and connection tracking event delivery by dropping the packets whose events were not successfully delivered over Netlink. Of course, this option would be settable via /proc as this approach reduces performance (in terms of filtered connections per seconds by a stateful firewall) but providing reliable logging and event delivery (for conntrackd) in return. This patch also changes some clients of netlink_broadcast() that may report ENOBUFS errors via printk. This error handling is not of any help. Instead, the userspace daemons that are listening to those netlink messages should resync themselves with the kernel-side if they hit ENOBUFS. BTW, netlink_broadcast() clients include those that call cn_netlink_send(), nlmsg_multicast() and genlmsg_multicast() since they internally call netlink_broadcast() and return its error value. Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* wimax: basic API: kernel/user messaging, rfkill and resetInaky Perez-Gonzalez2009-01-07
Implements the three basic operations provided by the stack's control interface to WiMAX devices: - Messaging channel between user space and driver/device This implements a direct communication channel between user space and the driver/device, by which free form messages can be sent back and forth. This is intended for device-specific features, vendor quirks, etc. - RF-kill framework integration Provide most of the RF-Kill integration for WiMAX drivers so that all device drivers have to do is after wimax_dev_add() is call wimax_report_rfkill_{hw,sw}() to update initial state and then every time it changes. Provides wimax_rfkill() for the kernel to call to set software RF-Kill status and/or query current hardware and software switch status. Exports wimax_rfkill() over generic netlink to user space. - Reset a WiMAX device Provides wimax_reset() for the kernel to reset a wimax device as needed and exports it over generic netlink to user space. This API is clearly limited, as it still provides no way to do the basic scan, connect and disconnect in a hardware independent way. The WiMAX case is more complex than WiFi due to the way networks are discovered and provisioned. The next developments are to add the basic operations so they can be offerent by different drivers. However, we'd like to get more vendors to jump in and provide feedback of how the user/kernel API/abstraction layer should be. The user space code for the i2400m, as of now, uses the messaging channel, but that will change as the API evolves. Signed-off-by: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>