| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It's big, but there doesn't seem to be a way to split it up smaller...
Signed-off-by: Tony Jones <tonyj@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Cc: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
Cc: Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>
Cc: Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@gmail.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adds support for host side SMP processing, via a separate
SMP interpreter file.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
sparse complains about the mixing of enums in libsas. Since the
underlying numeric values of both enums are the same, combine them
to get rid of the warning.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There's currently no destructor for the bsg components. If you insert
and remove the module, you see the bsg devices building up and up. This
patch adds the destructor in the correct place in the transport class so
that the bsg and request queue are removed just before the device
destruction.
Acked-by: FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The sas transport class attaches one bsg device to every SAS object
(host, device, expander, etc). LLDs can define a function to handle
SMP requests via sas_function_template::smp_handler.
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This one was noticed by Gilbert Wu of Adaptec:
The libata core actually does the DMA mapping for you, so there has to
be an exception in the device drivers that *don't* do dma mapping for
ATA commands. However, since we've already done this, libsas must now
dma map any ATA commands that it wishes to issue ... and yes, this is a
horrible mess.
Additionally, the test in aic94xx for ATA protocols isn't quite right.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
sas_rphy_delete does two things: it removes the sas_rphy from the transport
layer and frees the sas_rphy. This can be broken down into two functions,
sas_rphy_remove and sas_rphy_free; sas_rphy_remove is of interest to
sas_discover_root_expander because it calls functions that require
sas_rphy_add as a prerequisite and can fail (namely sas_discover_expander).
In that case, sas_discover_root_expander needs to be able to undo the effects
of sas_rphy_add yet leave the job of freeing the sas_rphy to the caller of
sas_discover_root_expander.
This patch also removes some unnecessary code from sas_discover_end_dev
to eliminate an unnecessary cycle of sas_notify_lldd_gone/found for SAS
devices, thus eliminating a sas_rphy_remove call (and fixing a race condition
where a SCSI target scan can come in between the gone and found call).
It also moves the sas_rphy_free calls into sas_discover_domain and
sas_ex_discover_end_dev to complement the sas_rphy_allocation via
sas_get_port_device.
This patch does not change the semantics of sas_rphy_delete.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch lets a user arbitrarily enable or disable a phy via sysfs.
Potential applications include shutting down a phy to replace one
lane of wide port, and (more importantly) providing a method for the
libata SATL to control the phy.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch implements a REQ_DEVICE_RESET handler for the aic94xx
driver. Like the earlier REQ_TASK_ABORT patch, this patch defers the
device reset to the Scsi_Host's workqueue, which has the added benefit
of ensuring that the device reset does not happen at the same time
that the abort tmfs are being processed. After the phy reset, the
busted drive should go away and be re-detected later, which is indeed
what I've seen on both a x260 and a x206m.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
According to SPEC, the minimum_linkrate and maximum_linkrate should be
settable by the user. This patch introduces a callback that allows the
sas class to pass these settings on to the driver.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
At the moment we have two separate linkspeed enumerations covering
roughly the same values. This patch consolidates on a single one enum
sas_linkspeed in scsi_transport_sas.h and uses it everywhere in the
aic94xx driver. Eventually I'll get around to removing the duplicated
fields in asd_sas_phy and sas_phy ...
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This flag denotes local attachment of the phy. There are two problems
with it:
1) It's actually redundant ... you can get the same information simply
by seeing whether a host is the phys parent
2) we condition a lot of phy parameters on it on the false assumption
that we can only control local phys. I'm wiring up phy resets in the
aic94xx now, and it will be able to reset non-local phys as well.
I fixed 2) by moving the local check into the reset and stats function
of the mptsas, since that seems to be the only HBA that can't
(currently) control non-local phys.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds the ability to add a backlink to a particular port. The
idea is to represent properly ports on expanders that are used
specifically for linking to the parent device in the topology.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some SAS HBAs don't want to go to the trouble of tracking port numbers,
so they'd simply like to say "add this port and give it a number".
This is especially beneficial from the hotplug point of view, since
tracking ports and the available number space can be a real pain.
The current implementation uses an incrementing number per expander to
add the port on. However, since there can never be more ports than
there are phys, a later implementation will try to be more intelligent
about this.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
this patch introduces a port object, separates out ports and phys,
with ports becoming the primary objects of the tree.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows the removal of the contained flag and also does a bit of
class renaming (sas_rphy->sas_device).
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch makes expanders appear as labelled objects with properties in
the SAS tree.
I've also modified the phy code to make expander phys appear labelled by
host number, expander number and phy index.
So, for my current config, you see something like this in sysfs:
/sys/class/scsi_host/host1/device/phy-1:4/expander-1:0/phy-1-0:12/rphy-1:0-12/target1:0:1
And the expander properties are:
jejb@sparkweed> cd /sys/class/sas_expander/expander-1\:0/
jejb@sparkweed> for f in *; do echo -n $f ": "; cat $f; done
component_id : 29024
component_revision_id : 4
component_vendor_id : VITESSE
device : cat: device: Is a directory
level : 0
product_id : VSC7160 Eval Brd
product_rev : 4
uevent : cat: uevent: Permission denied
vendor_id : VITESSE
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Begin introducing the concept of sas remote devices that have an rphy
embedded. The first one (this) is a simple end device. All that an
end device really does is have port mode page parameters contained.
The next and more complex piece will be expander remote devices.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I don't think these exist in silicon yet, but the aic94xx driver has a
register setting for them.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add a flag to mark a PHY as attached to the HBA as opposed to beeing on
an expander. This is needed because various features are only supported
on those. This is a crude hack, the proper fix would be to use
different classes for host-attached vs expander phys. I'm looking into
that.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For now supporting the ->get_linkerrors method is mandatory. I'll
probably be beaten to implement the .show_foo variables and different
types of attributes soon..
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
|
|
|
The SAS transport class contains common code to deal with SAS HBAs, an
aproximated representation of SAS topologies in the driver model,
and various sysfs attributes to expose these topologies and managment
interfaces to userspace.
In addition to the basic SCSI core objects this transport class introduces
two additional intermediate objects: The SAS PHY as represented by struct
sas_phy defines an "outgoing" PHY on a SAS HBA or Expander, and the SAS
remote PHY represented by struct sas_rphy defines an "incoming" PHY on a
SAS Expander or end device. Note that this is purely a software concept, the
underlying hardware for a PHY and a remote PHY is the exactly the same.
There is no concept of a SAS port in this code, users can see what PHYs
form a wide port based on the port_identifier attribute, which is the same
for all PHYs in a port.
This submission doesn't handle hot-plug addition or removal of SAS devices
and thus doesn't do scanning in a workqueue yet, that will be added in
phase2 after this submission. In a third phase I will add additional
managment infrastructure.
I think this submission is ready for 2.6.14, but additional comments are
of course very welcome.
I'd like to thanks James Smart a lot for his very useful input on the
design.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
|
