aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include/linux/xfrm.h
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* [IPSEC]: Add XFRMA_SA/XFRMA_POLICY for delete notificationHerbert Xu2005-06-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch changes the format of the XFRM_MSG_DELSA and XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY notification so that the main message sent is of the same format as that received by the kernel if the original message was via netlink. This also means that we won't lose the byid information carried in km_event. Since this user interface is introduced by Jamal's patch we can still afford to change it. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* [IPSEC] Add complete xfrm event notificationJamal Hadi Salim2005-06-19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Heres the final patch. What this patch provides - netlink xfrm events - ability to have events generated by netlink propagated to pfkey and vice versa. - fixes the acquire lets-be-happy-with-one-success issue Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@cyberus.ca> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
* [XFRM]: Cleanup xfrm_msg_min and xfrm_dispatchThomas Graf2005-05-03
| | | | | | | | | Converts xfrm_msg_min and xfrm_dispatch to use c99 designated initializers to make greping a little bit easier. Also replaces two hardcoded message type with meaningful names. Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* [XFRM]: Prevent off-by-one access to xfrm_dispatchThomas Graf2005-05-03
| | | | | | | | Makes the type > XFRM_MSG_MAX check behave correctly to protect access to xfrm_dispatch. Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
* Linux-2.6.12-rc2v2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds2005-04-16
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!