aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include/linux/percpu.h
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* [PATCH] remove unused blkp field in percpu_dataEric Dumazet2006-01-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I found that blkp field was not used in kernel tree. As most of the times NR_CPUS is a power of two and kmalloc() memory blocks too, this extra field basically doubles the memory space allocated in __alloc_percpu() to store the 'struct percpu_data' (for example, if NR_CPUS=8 on i386, kmalloc(4*8+4) returns a 64 bytes block instead of a 32 bytes block after this patch) Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* [PATCH] slab: remove unused align parameter from alloc_percpuPekka Enberg2006-01-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | __alloc_percpu and alloc_percpu both take an 'align' argument which is completely ignored. snmp6_mib_init() in net/ipv6/af_inet6.c attempts to use it, but it will be ignored. Therefore, remove the 'align' argument and fixup the lone caller. Signed-off-by: Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com> Acked-by: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* [PATCH] Shut up per_cpu_ptr() on UPPaul Mundt2005-11-13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Currently per_cpu_ptr() doesn't really do anything with 'cpu' in the UP case. This is problematic in the cases where this is the only place the variable is referenced: CC kernel/workqueue.o kernel/workqueue.c: In function `current_is_keventd': kernel/workqueue.c:460: warning: unused variable `cpu' Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
* Linux-2.6.12-rc2v2.6.12-rc2Linus Torvalds2005-04-16
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!