| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The "translated" io macros were never really used. Remove them.
Preserve the L7200 inb() and friends by defining the __io()
macro, so that the generic versions can be used instead.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These functions have been deprecated for quite some time, and in
fact are no longer used. They just add to clutter. Remove them.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch from Daniel Jacobowitz
The ARM kernel has several uses of asm("foo%?"). %? is a GCC internal
modifier used to output conditional execution predicates. However, no
version of GCC supports conditionalizing asm statements. GCC 4.2 will
correctly expand %? to the empty string in user asms. Earlier versions may
reuse the condition from the previous instruction. In 'if (foo) asm
("bar%?");' this is somewhat likely to be right... but not reliable.
So, the only safe thing to do is to remove the uses of %?. I believe
the tlbflush.h occurances were supposed to be removed before, based
on the comment about %? not working at the top of that file.
Old versions of GCC could omit branches around user asms if the asm didn't
mark the condition codes as clobbered. This problem hasn't been seen on any
recent (3.x or 4.x) GCC, but it could theoretically happen. So, where
%? was removed a cc clobber was added.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch from Andrew Victor
Remove the remaining legacy __mem_isa() definitions for the ARM
platforms.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Victor <andrew@sanpeople.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Including asm/hardware.h into asm/io.h can cause #define clashes
between platform specific definitions and driver local definitions.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
|
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
|
