| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add an acpi_video_unregister_backlight function, which only unregisters
the backlight device, and leaves the acpi_notifier in place. Some acpi_vendor
driver need this as they don't want the acpi_video# backlight device, but do
need the acpi-video driver for hotkey handling.
Chances are that this new acpi_video_unregister_backlight() is actually
what existing acpi_vendor drivers have wanted all along. Currently acpi_vendor
drivers which want to disable the acpi_video# backlight device, make 2 calls:
acpi_video_dmi_promote_vendor();
acpi_video_unregister();
The intention here is to make things independent of when acpi_video_register()
gets called. As acpi_video_register() will get called on acpi-video load time
on non intel gfx machines, while it gets called on i915 load time on intel
gfx machines.
This leads to the following 2 interesting scenarios:
a) intel gfx:
1) acpi-video module gets loaded (as it is a dependency of acpi_vendor
and i915)
2) acpi-video does NOT call acpi_video_register()
3) acpi_vendor loads (lets assume it loads before i915), calls
acpi_video_dmi_promote_vendor(); which sets
ACPI_VIDEO_BACKLIGHT_DMI_VENDOR
4) calls acpi_video_unregister -> not registered, nop
5) i915 loads, calls acpi_video_register
6) acpi_video_register registers the acpi_notifier for the hotkeys,
does NOT register a backlight device because of
ACPI_VIDEO_BACKLIGHT_DMI_VENDOR
b) non intel gfx
1) acpi-video module gets loaded (as it is a dependency acpi_vendor)
2) acpi-video calls acpi_video_register()
3) acpi_video_register registers the acpi_notifier for the hotkeys,
and a backlight device
4) acpi_vendor loads, calls acpi_video_dmi_promote_vendor()
5) calls acpi_video_unregister, this unregisters BOTH the acpi_notifier
for the hotkeys AND the backlight device
So here we have possibly the same acpi_vendor module, making the same calls,
but with different results, in one cases acpi-video does handle hotkeys,
in the other it does not.
Note that the a) scenario turns into b) if we assume the i915 module loads
before the vendor_acpi module, so we also have different behavior depending
on module loading order!
So as said I believe that quite a few existing acpi_vendor modules really
always want the behavior of a), hence this patch adds a new
acpi_video_unregister_backlight() which gives the behavior of a) independent
of module loading order.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We attempted to address a regression introduced by commit a57f7f9
(ACPICA: Add Windows8/Server2012 string for _OSI method.) after which
ACPI video backlight support doesn't work on a number of systems,
because the relevant AML methods in the ACPI tables in their BIOSes
become useless after the BIOS has been told that the OS is compatible
with Windows 8. That problem is tracked by the bug entry at:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51231
Commit 8c5bd7a (ACPI / video / i915: No ACPI backlight if firmware
expects Windows 8) introduced for this purpose essentially prevented
the ACPI backlight support from being used if the BIOS had been told
that the OS was compatible with Windows 8 and the i915 driver was
loaded, in which case the backlight would always be handled by i915.
Unfortunately, however, that turned out to cause problems with
backlight to appear on multiple systems with symptoms indicating that
i915 was unable to control the backlight on those systems as
expected.
For this reason, revert commit 8c5bd7a, but leave the function
acpi_video_backlight_quirks() introduced by it, because another
commit on top of it uses that function.
References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/21/119
References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/22/261
References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/23/429
References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/23/459
References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/23/81
References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/24/27
Reported-and-tested-by: James Hogan <james@albanarts.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: Steven Newbury <steve@snewbury.org.uk>
Reported-by: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Reported-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@adurom.com>
Tested-by: Joerg Platte <jplatte@naasa.net>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
According to Matthew Garrett, "Windows 8 leaves backlight control up
to individual graphics drivers rather than making ACPI calls itself.
There's plenty of evidence to suggest that the Intel driver for
Windows [8] doesn't use the ACPI interface, including the fact that
it's broken on a bunch of machines when the OS claims to support
Windows 8. The simplest thing to do appears to be to disable the
ACPI backlight interface on these systems".
There's a problem with that approach, however, because simply
avoiding to register the ACPI backlight interface if the firmware
calls _OSI for Windows 8 may not work in the following situations:
(1) The ACPI backlight interface actually works on the given system
and the i915 driver is not loaded (e.g. another graphics driver
is used).
(2) The ACPI backlight interface doesn't work on the given system,
but there is a vendor platform driver that will register its
own, equally broken, backlight interface if not prevented from
doing so by the ACPI subsystem.
Therefore we need to allow the ACPI backlight interface to be
registered until the i915 driver is loaded which then will unregister
it if the firmware has called _OSI for Windows 8 (or will register
the ACPI video driver without backlight support if not already
present).
For this reason, introduce an alternative function for registering
ACPI video, acpi_video_register_with_quirks(), that will check
whether or not the ACPI video driver has already been registered
and whether or not the backlight Windows 8 quirk has to be applied.
If the quirk has to be applied, it will block the ACPI backlight
support and either unregister the backlight interface if the ACPI
video driver has already been registered, or register the ACPI
video driver without the backlight interface otherwise. Make
the i915 driver use acpi_video_register_with_quirks() instead of
acpi_video_register() in i915_driver_load().
This change is based on earlier patches from Matthew Garrett,
Chun-Yi Lee and Seth Forshee and includes a fix from Aaron Lu's.
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51231
Tested-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Tested-by: Igor Gnatenko <i.gnatenko.brain@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
opregion-based platforms will send ACPI video event 0x80 for a range of
notification types for legacy compatibility. This is interpreted as a
display switch event, which may not be appropriate in the circumstances.
When we receive such an event we should make sure that the platform is
genuinely requesting a display switch before passing that event through
to userspace.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_opregion.c:30:
include/acpi/video.h:22: warning: ‘struct acpi_device’ declared inside parameter list
...
include/acpi/video.h:24: error: ‘ENODEV’ undeclared (first use in this function)
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The ACPI spec includes a provision for hardware to provide EDID via the
ACPI video extension. In the KMS world it's necessary for a way to obtain
this from within the kernel. Add a function that either returns the EDID
for the provided ACPI display ID or the first display of the provided type.
Also add support for ensuring that devices with legacy IDs are supported.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sometimes both acpi video and i915 driver are compiled as modules.
And there exists the strict dependency between the two drivers.
The acpi video bus will be unloaded in course of unloading the i915 driver.
If we unload the acpi video driver, then the kernel oops will be triggered.
Add the reference count to avoid unloading the ACPI video bus twice.
The reference count should be checked before unregistering the acpi video bus.
If the reference count is already zero, it won't unregister it again.
And after the acpi video bus is already unregistered, the reference count
will be set to zero.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13396
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The i915 DRM triggers registration of the ACPI video driver on load. It
should unregister it at unload in order to avoid generating backtraces on
being reloaded.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
|
|
|
Intel graphics hardware that implements the ACPI IGD OpRegion spec
requires that the list of display devices be populated before any ACPI
video methods are called. Detect when this is the case and defer
registration until the opregion code calls it. Fixes crashes on HP
laptops.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11259
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
