| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I got the following warnings on IA64:
drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c: In function 'fc_lport_recv_flogi_req':
drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c:788: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'u64'
drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_lport.c:792: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'u64'
scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c: In function 'fc_rport_recv_plogi_req':
/home/fujita/git/linux-2.6/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_rport.c:968: warning: format '%llx' expects type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'u64'
Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1) There were a few functions with a strange layout, i.e. all
arguments on the second line, when not necessary.
Where ever possible I moved the return value to the same line
as the function name. However, when the line was too long
to have a single argument on the same line I moved the
return value to above line. For example:
<short return> <function name>(<arg 1>, <arg2>)
and
<very long return value>
<function name>(<arg1>,
<arg2>)
2) Removed one extra whitespace line
3) Fixed two typos
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
1) Added '()' for function names in kerneldoc comments
2) Changed comment bookends from '**/' to '*/'. The comment on the the
mailing list was that '**/' "is consistently unconventional. Not
wrong, just odd." The Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt
states that kerneldoc comment blocks should end with '**/' but most
(if not all) instance I found under drivers/scsi/ were only using
the '*/' so I converted to that style.
3) Removed incorrect linebreaks in kerneldoc comments where found
4) Removed a few unnecessary blank comment lines in kerneldoc comment
blocks
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If we've just created an interface and the an rport is
logging in we may have a request on the wire (say PRLI).
If we destroy the interface, we'll go through each rport
on the disc->rports list and set each rport's state to NONE.
Then the lport will reset the EM. The EM reset will send a
CLOSED event to the prli_resp() handler which will notice
that the state != PRLI. In this case it frees the frame
pointer, decrements the refcount and unlocks the rport.
The problem is that there isn't a frame in this case. It's
just a pointer with an embedded error code. The free causes
an Oops.
This patch moves the error checking to be before the state
checking.
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This allows any rport ELS to retry on LS_RJT.
The rport error handling would only retry on resource allocation failures
and exchange timeouts. I have a target that will occasionally reject PLOGI
when we do a quick LOGO/PLOGI. When a critical ELS was rejected, libfc would
fail silently leaving the rport in a dead state.
The retry count and delay are managed by fc_rport_error_retry. If the retry
count is exceeded fc_rport_error will be called. When retrying is not the
correct course of action, fc_rport_error can be called directly.
Signed-off-by: Chris Leech <christopher.leech@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When a rport goes away, libFC does a plogi which will reset exchanges
at the rport. Clean exchanges at our end, both in transport and libFC.
If transport hooks into exch_mgr_reset, it will call back into
fc_exch_mgr_reset() to clean up libFC exchanges.
Signed-off-by: Abhijeet Joglekar <abjoglek@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fc_exch_mgr structure is private to fc_exch.c. To export exch_mgr_reset to
transport, transport needs access to the exch manager. Change
exch_mgr_reset to use lport param which is the shared structure between
libFC and transport.
Alternatively, fc_exch_mgr definition can be moved to libfc.h so that lport
can be accessed from mp*.
Signed-off-by: Abhijeet Joglekar <abjoglek@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
|
|
|
libFC is composed of 4 blocks supported by an exchange manager
and a framing library. The upper 4 layers are fc_lport, fc_disc,
fc_rport and fc_fcp. A LLD that uses libfc could choose to
either use libfc's block, or using the transport template
defined in libfc.h, override one or more blocks with its own
implementation.
The EM (Exchange Manager) manages exhcanges/sequences for all
commands- ELS, CT and FCP.
The framing library frames ELS and CT commands.
The fc_lport block manages the library's representation of the
host's FC enabled ports.
The fc_disc block manages discovery of targets as well as
handling changes that occur in the FC fabric (via. RSCN events).
The fc_rport block manages the library's representation of other
entities in the FC fabric. Currently the library uses this block
for targets, its peer when in point-to-point mode and the
directory server, but can be extended for other entities if
needed.
The fc_fcp block interacts with the scsi-ml and handles all
I/O.
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
[jejb: added include of delay.h to fix ppc64 compile prob spotted by sfr]
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
|
