| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When the NIC is expected to operate in high temperature,
it is advisable to put more aggresive thermal throttling
parameters, in order to prevent CT-kill.
Signed-off-by: eytan lifshitz <eytan.lifshitz@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The LQ command argument isn't needed, it's always taken from the
station struct that's already passed, remove the argument.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Add prints visible to the user when entering and exiting
thrermal throttling, because so users can tell that the
NIC is getting too hot (and throughput will decrease.)
Signed-off-by: eytan lifshitz <eytan.lifshitz@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The Thermal Throttling code could do that, fix it.
Signed-off-by: Eytan Lifshitz <eytan.lifshitz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
|
|
In order to avoid NIC destruction due to high temperature,
CT kill will power down the NIC.
To avoid this, thermal throttling will decrease throughput
to prevent the NIC from reaching the temperature at which
CT kill is performed.
Signed-off-by: Eytan Lifshitz <eytan.lifshitz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
|
