aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/scan.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* iwlwifi: Update Copyright to 2014Emmanuel Grumbach2013-12-31
| | | | | | Happy new year! Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
* cfg80211: consolidate passive-scan and no-ibss flagsLuis R. Rodriguez2013-11-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | These two flags are used for the same purpose, just combine them into a no-ir flag to annotate no initiating radiation is allowed. Old userspace sending either flag will have it treated as the no-ir flag. To be considerate to older userspace we also send both the no-ir flag and the old no-ibss flags. Newer userspace will have to be aware of older kernels. Update all places in the tree using these flags with the following semantic patch: @@ @@ -NL80211_RRF_PASSIVE_SCAN +NL80211_RRF_NO_IR @@ @@ -NL80211_RRF_NO_IBSS +NL80211_RRF_NO_IR @@ @@ -IEEE80211_CHAN_PASSIVE_SCAN +IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR @@ @@ -IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IBSS +IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR @@ @@ -NL80211_RRF_NO_IR | NL80211_RRF_NO_IR +NL80211_RRF_NO_IR @@ @@ -IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR | IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR +IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR @@ @@ -(NL80211_RRF_NO_IR) +NL80211_RRF_NO_IR @@ @@ -(IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR) +IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR Along with some hand-optimisations in documentation, to remove duplicates and to fix some indentation. Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> [do all the driver updates in one go] Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
* iwlwifi: dvm: remove P2P supportJohannes Berg2013-07-25
| | | | | | | | We're not planning to support P2P on older devices, so remove the Kconfig option and associated code for it. Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
* iwlwifi: move some configuration parameters into DVMJohannes Berg2013-05-27
| | | | | | | | | There are a number of parameters that aren't really hardware specific but rather define how the DVM firmware is used. Move these into the DVM configuration. Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
* iwlwifi: a few fixes in licenseEmmanuel Grumbach2013-03-06
| | | | | | | | | | 7000.c was released as GPL only by mistake: it should be dual licensed - GPL / BSD. The file that contains the license in the kernel is COPYING and not LICENSE.GPL. Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
* iwlwifi: update copyrightJohannes Berg2013-01-24
| | | | | | | Update Copyright notices to 2013. Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
* iwlwifi: iwlagn_request_scan: Fix check for priv->scan_requestTim Gardner2012-12-10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The WARN_ON_ONCE() check for scan_request will not correctly detect a NULL pointer for scan_type == IWL_SCAN_NORMAL. Make it explicit that the check only applies to normal scans. Convert WARN_ON_ONCE to WARN_ON since priv->scan_request really _can't_ be NULL for normal scans. If it is then we should emit frequent warnings. This smatch warning led to scrutiny of iwlagn_request_scan(): drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/scan.c:894 iwlagn_request_scan() error: we previously assumed 'priv->scan_request' could be null (see line 792) Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
* iwlwifi: Change define and struct names in iwl-eeprom-parse.hEytan Lifshitz2012-12-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Since we will have several forms of NVM (EEPROM, OTP, etc.) and they will have different layouts, make the parsed data more generic. This allows functional code to be independent of a specific layout. Also change some variables and function names from having "eeprom" to "nvm" in their name. Signed-off-by: Eytan Lifshitz <eytan.lifshitz@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
* iwlwifi: use eth_broadcast_addrJohannes Berg2012-09-19
| | | | | | | | Instead of memcpy() from a static array, just use the new helper function eth_broadcast_addr(). Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
* iwlwifi: limit dwell time more strictlyJohannes Berg2012-06-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The dwell time for scanning is currently limited so that it fits into the timings inside the ucode when that is tracking DTIM/beacon periods for the AP(s) it's connected to. However, when it's connected to two APs, those may be in lockstep, for example if they both have a DTIM interval of 100 TU, then one could be 50 TU after the other, leaving only 50 TU free to be used by scanning. Since we can't know how far apart they are the only option is to restrict to 1/2 of the minium of the two APs. In theory, it would be possible to not use 1/2 of the minimum but take into account that if they have different intervals then there will be a bit more time since they can't be in lockstep, but as they will have 100 TU intervals in practice that complex calculation will probably just result in hard-to-find bugs. Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
* iwlwifi: fix radio reset scan dwell vs. quiet timeJohannes Berg2012-06-21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | My previous commit to shorten the radio reset time caused issues as the firmware checks the active dwell time against the quiet time, asserting that the dwell is >= quiet time. This isn't really needed in case of passive scanning like here, but of course we need to pass that check. To fix this, override the quiet time to be the same as the radio reset dwell time. Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
* iwlwifi: use minimal time for radio reset scanJohannes Berg2012-06-20
| | | | | | | | | | | | | The effect of using a short single-channel scan to reset the radio is that scanning a channel that isn't in use needs to re-tune the radio. This means that the dwell time is irrelevant, so use a shorter time. While at it, clean up the code for this a bit. Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
* iwlwifi: refactor EEPROM reading/parsingJohannes Berg2012-06-06
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The EEPROM reading/parsing code is all mixed in the driver today, and the EEPROM is parsed only when we access data from it. This is problematic because the NVM needs to be parsed and that is independent of reading it. Also, the NVM format for new devices will be different and probably require a new parser. Therefore refactor the reading and parsing and create two independent components. Reading the EEPROM requires direct hardware accesses and therefore access to the transport, but parsing is independent and can be done on an NVM blob. Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
* iwlwifi: move DVM code into subdirectoryJohannes Berg2012-06-06
Since we're working on another mode/driver inside iwlwifi, move the current one into a subdirectory to more cleanly separate the code. While at it, rename all the files. Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>