| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
v2: Rebased on latest code
Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Mohan Marimuthu <yogesh.mohan.marimuthu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula<jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Some panels require one time programming if they do not contain their
own eeprom for basic register initialization. The sequence is
Panel Reset --> Send OTP --> Enable Pixel Stream --> Enable the panel
v2: Based on review comments from Jani and Ville
- Updated the commit message with more details
- Move the new parameters out of this patch
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Mohan Marimuthu <yogesh.mohan.marimuthu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
On my 855 machine the BIOS uses the following DPLL settings:
DPLL 0x90016000
FP0 = 0x61207
FP1 = 0x21207
With the 66MHz SSC refclock, that puts the BIOS generated VCO
frequency at ~908 MHz, which is lower than the 930 MHz limit
we have currently. This also results in the pixel clock coming
out significantly higher than the requested 65 MHz when we try
to recompute it.
Reduce the the VCO limit to 908 MHz. Combined with the earlier
SSC reference clock accuracy fix, this results in the pixel clock
coming out as 65.08 MHz which is quite close to the target. For
some reason the BIOS uses 64.881 MHz, which isn't quite as close.
This makes kms_flip wf_vblank-ts-check pass for the first time
on this machine \o/
Cc: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Store the SSC refclock frequency in kHz to get more accuracy. Currently
we're pretending that 66 MHz is ~66000 kHz, when in fact it is actually
~66667 kHz. By storing the less rounded kHz value we get a much better
accuracy for out pixel clock calculations.
Cc: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bruno Prémont has a 855 machine with a 1400x1050 LVDS screen.
The VBT mode is as follows:
0:"1400x1050" 0 108000 1400 1416 1528 1688 1050 1051 1054 1066 0x8 0xa
The BIOS uses the following DPLL settings:
DPLL = 0x90020000
FP0 = 0x2140e
FP1 = 0x21207
That puts the BIOS generated VCO frequency at 1512 MHz, which is
higher than the 1400 MHz limit we have currently.
Let's bump the VCO limit to 1512 MHz and see what happens.
Cc: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bruno Prémont has a 855 machine with a 1400x1050 LVDS screen.
The VBT mode is as follows:
0:"1400x1050" 0 108000 1400 1416 1528 1688 1050 1051 1054 1066 0x8 0xa
The BIOS uses the following DPLL settings:
DPLL = 0x90020000
FP0 = 0x2140e
FP1 = 0x21207
We can't generate that pixel clock currently as we're limiting the N
divider to at least 3, whereas the BIOS uses a value of 2.
Let's reduce the N minimum to 2 and see what happens.
Cc: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In order to determine the correct p2 divider for LVDS on gen2,
we need to check the CLKB mode from the LVDS port register to
determine if we're dealing with single or dual channel LVDS.
Cc: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Bruno Prémont <bonbons@linux-vserver.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Every ring seems to have a BB_ADDR registers, so include them all in the
error state.
v2: Also include the _UDW on BDW
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The BB_ADDR register is documented to be 32bits at least since SNB.
Prior to that the high 32bits were listed as MBZ, so using a 64bit read
doesn't seem worth anything. Also the simulator doesn't like the 64bit
read. So just switch to using a 32bit read instead.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If we're disabling the VDD override bit and the panel is enabled, we
don't need to wait for anything. If the panel is disabled, then we
need to actually wait for panel_power_cycle_delay, not
panel_power_down_delay, because the power down delay was already
respected when we disabled the panel.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I don't see a reason to touch VDD when we're disabling the panel:
since the panel is enabled, we don't need VDD. This saves a few sleep
calls from the vdd_on and vdd_off functions at every modeset.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69693
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
[danvet: Fix the patch mangle wiggle has done ... Spotted by Paulo.
Also drop the runtime_pm_put call which now has to go due to different
patch ordering. Also from Paul.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We just don't need this. This saves 250ms from every modeset on my
machine.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The code to enable/disable PC8 already takes care of saving and
restoring all the registers we need to save/restore, so do a put()
call when we enable PC8 and a get() call when we disable it.
Ideally, in order to make it easier to add runtime PM support to other
platforms, we should move some things from the PC8 code to the runtime
PM code, but let's do this later, since we can make Haswell work right
now.
V2: - Rebase
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
[danvet: Don't actually enable runtime pm since I didn't merge all
patches.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The plan is to merge PC8 and D3 into a single feature, and when we're
in D3 we won't get any hotplug interrupt anyway, so leaving them
enable doesn't make sense, and it also brings us a problem. The
problem is that we get a hotplug interrupt right when we we wake up
from D3, when we're still waking up everything. If we fully disable
interrupts we won't get this hotplug interrupt, so we won't have
problems.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The current code was checking if all bits of "val" were enabled and
DE_PCH_EVENT_IVB was disabled. The new code doesn't care about the
state of DE_PCH_EVENT_IVB: it just checks if everything else is 1.
The goal is that future patches may completely disable interrupts, and
the LCPLL-disabling code shouldn't care about the state of
DE_PCH_EVENT_IVB.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
[danvet: I think the commit message is actually wrong in it's
description of what the old test checked, but the new one seems sane.
So meh.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
And put it when it's off. Otherwise, when you run pm_pc8 from
intel-gpu-tools, and the delayed function that disables VDD runs,
we'll get some messages saying we're touching registers while the HW
is suspended.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
These are needed when we cat the debugfs and sysfs files.
V2: - Rebase
V3: - Rebase
V4: - Rebase
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If I add code to enable runtime PM on my Haswell machine, start a
desktop environment, then enable runtime PM, these functions will
complain that they're trying to read/write registers while the
graphics card is suspended.
v2: - Simplify i915_gem_fault changes.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
[danvet: Drop the hunk in i915_hangcheck_elapsed, it's the wrong thing
to do.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that we are actually setting the device to the D3 state, we should
issue the notification.
The opregion spec says we should send the message before the adapter
is about to be placed in a lower power state, and after the adapter is
placed in a higher power state.
Jani originally wrote a similar patch for PC8, but then we discovered
that we were not really changing the PCI D states when
enabling/disabling PC8, so we had to postpone his patch.
v2: - Improve commit message, explaining the expected state.
v3: - Rebase.
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Credits-to: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> (v2)
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds the initial infrastructure to allow a Runtime PM
implementation that sets the device to its D3 state. The patch just
adds the necessary callbacks and the initial infrastructure.
We still don't have any platform that actually uses this
infrastructure, we still don't call get/put in all the places we need
to, and we don't have any function to save/restore the state of the
registers. This is not a problem since no platform uses the code added
by this patch. We have a few people simultaneously working on runtime
PM, so this initial code could help everybody make their plans.
V2: - Move some functions to intel_pm.c
- Remove useless pm_runtime_allow() call at init
- Remove useless pm_runtime_mark_last_busy() call at get
- Use pm_runtime_get_sync() instead of 2 calls
- Add a WARN to check if we're really awake
V3: - Rebase.
V4: - Don't need to call pci_{save,restore}_state and
pci_set_power_sate, since they're already called by the PCI
layer
- Remove wrong pm_runtime_enable() call at init_runtime_pm
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the current code, at haswell_modeset_global_resources, first we
decide if we want to enable/disable the power well, then we decide if
we want to enable/disable PC8. On the case where we're enabling PC8
this works fine, but on the case where we disable PC8 due to a non-eDP
monitor being enabled, we first enable the power well and then disable
PC8. Although wrong, this doesn't seem to be causing any problems now,
and we don't even see anything in dmesg. But the patches for runtime
D3 turn this problem into a real bug, so we need to fix it.
This fixes the "modeset-non-lpsp" subtest from the "pm_pc8" test from
intel-gpu-tools.
v2: - Rebase (i915_disable_power_well).
v3: - More reabase.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We already have some checks and shouldn't be reaching these places on
!HAS_PC8 platforms, but add a WARN, just in case.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The CRI clock is related to the display PHY, so the setup belongs
in intel_init_dpio().
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We don't modify the packed infoframe data, so we should keep the
const qualifier in place. Just pass the buffer as 'const void *'
instead of 'const uint8_t *' and we can drop the cast entirely.
v2: Do intel_sdvo_write_infoframe() as well
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If one mode of a internal panel has more than one refresh rate, then a reduced
clock is found for the LFP (LVDS/eDP). This enables switching between low
and high frequency dynamically. Moving downclock calculation to intel_panel
so that it is common for LVDS and eDP.
Signed-off-by: Vandana Kannan <vandana.kannan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pradeep Bhat <pradeep.bhat@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since early sanitize and uncore sanitize are called one after the other,
I think, we can remove second forcewake reset which was are calling
twice in both the functions.
Note that this is merge fallout between
commit ef46e0d247da0a7a408573aa15870e231bbd4af2
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date: Sat Nov 16 16:00:09 2013 +0100
drm/i915: restore the early forcewake cleanup
and
commit 521198a2e7095c8c7daa8d7d3a76a110c346be6f
Author: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri Aug 23 16:52:30 2013 +0300
drm/i915: sanitize forcewake registers on reset
Signed-off-by: Deepak S <deepak.s@intel.com>
[danvet: Explain how this came to be.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Linux 3.13-rc3
I need a backmerge for two reasons:
- For merging the ppgtt patches from Ben I need to pull in the bdw
support.
- We now have duplicated calls to intel_uncore_forcewake_reset in the
setup code to due 2 different patches merged into -next and 3.13.
The conflict is silen so I need the merge to be able to apply
Deepak's fixup patch.
Conflicts:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
Trivial conflict, it doesn't even show up in the merge diff.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
wow no idea how I got this far without seeing this,
leaking the entries in the list makes kmalloc-64 slab grow.
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65121
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Matthew Stapleton <matthew4196@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Reported-by: Jim Davis <jim.epost@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Jim Davis <jim.epost@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Copy/Paste typo.. we need to test for ->kdev instead of ->dev.
Reported-by: Juha Leppänen <juha_efku@dnainternet.net>
Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
airlied:
The lifetime changes introduced in 5bdebb183c9702a8c57a01dff09337be3de337a6
tried to use device_create, however that led to the regression where dev->type
wasn't getting set correctly. First attempt at fixing it would have led to
a race, so this undoes the device_createa work and does it all manually
making sure the dev->type is setup before we register the device.
Signed-off-by: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This patch releases a vma object when cleaning up userptr resources.
A new vma object was allocated and copied when getting userptr pages
so the new vma object should be freed properly if the userptr pages
aren't used anymore.
Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
|
| |\
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
into drm-fixes
The set_need_resched() removal fix and yet another fix in
ttm_bo_move_memcpy().
* 'ttm-fixes-3.13' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~thomash/linux:
drm/ttm: Remove set_need_resched from the ttm fault handler
drm/ttm: Don't move non-existing data
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Addresses
"[BUG] completely bonkers use of set_need_resched + VM_FAULT_NOPAGE".
In the first occurence it was used to try to be nice while releasing the
mmap_sem and retrying the fault to work around a locking inversion.
The second occurence was never used.
There has been some discussion whether we should change the locking order to
mmap_sem -> bo_reserve. This patch doesn't address that issue, and leaves
that locking order undefined. The solution that we release the mmap_sem if
tryreserve fails and wait for the buffer to become unreserved is something
we want in any case, and follows how the core vm system waits for pages
to be come unlocked while releasing the mmap_sem.
The code also outlines what needs to be changed if we want to establish the
locking order as mmap_sem -> bo::reserve.
One slight issue that remains with this code is that the fault handler might
be prone to starvation if another thread countinously reserves the buffer.
IMO that usage pattern is highly unlikely.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
|
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
If ttm_bo_move_memcpy was instructed to move a non-populated ttm to
io memory, it would first populate the ttm, then move the data and then
destroy the ttm. That's stupid. However, some drivers might have relied on
this to clear io memory from old stuff. So instead of a NOP, which would
be the most efficient, just clear the destination.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <jakob@vmware.com>
|
| |\ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
git://people.freedesktop.org/~thomash/linux into drm-fixes
Below is a fix for a false lockep warning,
and the vmwgfx prime implementation.
* 'vmwgfx-fixes-3.13' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~thomash/linux:
drm/vmwgfx: Make vmwgfx dma buffers prime aware
drm/vmwgfx: Make surfaces prime-aware
drm/vmwgfx: Hook up the prime ioctls
drm/ttm: Add a minimal prime implementation for ttm base objects
drm/vmwgfx: Fix false lockdep warning
drm/ttm: Allow execbuf util reserves without ticket
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Should we need to share dma buffers using prime, let's make them prime
aware.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <jakob@vmware.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Add prime exporting and imporing operations to surfaces
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <jakob@vmware.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Also provide a completely dumb dma-buf ops implementation.
Once we have other virtual dma-buf aware devices, we need to provide
something better.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <jakob@vmware.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <jakob@vmware.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
A lockdep warning is hit when evicting surfaces and reserving the backup
buffer. Since this buffer can only be reserved by the process holding the
surface reservation or by the buffer eviction processes that use tryreserve,
there is no real deadlock here, but there's no other way to silence lockdep
than to use a tryreserve. This means the reservation might fail if the buffer
is about to be evicted or swapped out, but we now have code in place to
handle that reasonably well.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <jakob@vmware.com>
|
| | |/
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
If no reservation ticket is given to the execbuf reservation utilities,
try reservation with non-blocking semantics.
This is intended for eviction paths that use the execbuf reservation
utilities for convenience rather than for deadlock avoidance.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <jakob@vmware.com>
|
| |\ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel into drm-fixes
Just a small pile of fixes for bugs and a few regressions. I'm still
trying to track down a driver load hang on my g33 (which infuriatingly
doesn't happen when loading the module manually after boot), somehow
bisecting loves to go astray on this one :( And there's a (harmless)
locking WARN in the suspend code due to one of Jesse's vlv backlight
rework patches. Otherwise nothing outstanding afaik.
* tag 'drm-intel-fixes-2013-11-20' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel:
drm/i915: Fix gen3 self-refresh watermarks
drm/i915: Replicate BIOS eDP bpp clamping hack for hsw
drm/i915: Do not enable package C8 on unsupported hardware
drm/i915: Hold pc8 lock around toggling pc8.gpu_idle
drm/i915: encoder->get_config is no longer optional
drm/i915/tv: add ->get_config callback
drm/i915: restore the early forcewake cleanup
Partially revert "drm/i915: tune the RC6 threshold for stability"
drm/i915: flush cursors harder
i915: Use 120MHz LVDS SSC clock for gen5/gen6/gen7
x86/early quirk: use gen6 stolen detection for VLV
drm/i915/dp: set sink to power down mode on dp disable
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
This regression has been introduced in
commit 4fe8590a921d0b2e36e542dbfa89a8c5993f5a3f
Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed Sep 4 18:25:22 2013 +0300
drm/i915: Use adjusted_mode appropriately when computing watermarks
I guess we should renable the enabled local variable into something a
notch more descriptive, but that's something for -next.
The effect on my i945gme netbook is pretty severe amounts of underruns
- usually the very first pixel gets used for the entire screeen.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Haswell's DDI encoders have their own ->get_config callback and in
commit c6cd2ee2d59111a07cd9199564c9bdcb2d11e5cf
Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Date: Mon Oct 21 10:52:07 2013 +0300
drm/i915/dp: workaround BIOS eDP bpp clamping issue
we've forgotten to replicate this hack. So let's do it that.
Note for backporters: The above commit and all it's depencies need to
be backported first.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71049
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Tested-by: Gökçen Eraslan <gokcen.eraslan@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
If the hardware does not support package C8, then do not even schedule
work to enable it. Thereby we can eliminate a bunch of dangerous work.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
We need to hold the pc8 lock around toggling the value of gpu_idle.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
We must have one to fill out the adjusted_mode.crtc_clock. And with
the tv encoder fixed up every encoder we have has a ->get_config
callback. So we can drop the checks.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
We need this to properly fill in adjusted_mode.crtc_clock, otherwise
the state checker gets unhappy. This seems to have been forgotten in
the big clock rework in
commit 18442d08786472c63a0a80c27f92b033dffc26de
Author: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri Sep 13 16:00:08 2013 +0300
drm/i915: Fix port_clock and adjusted_mode.clock readout all over
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Some BIOS just leak the forcewak bits, which we clean up.
Unfortunately this has been broken in
commit 521198a2e7095c8c7daa8d7d3a76a110c346be6f
Author: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri Aug 23 16:52:30 2013 +0300
drm/i915: sanitize forcewake registers on reset
To make this work both for resets and for BIOS takeover just add the
forcewake clearing call back to intel_uncore_early_sanitize.
We need to clear the forcewake in early sanitize so that the forcewak
dance in intel_uncore_init (to figure out whether we have mt or legacy
forcewake on ivb) works. That cleanup fits in nicely with the general
topic of early_sanitize to prepare for the very first mmio ops.
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reported-by: Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com>
Cc: Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com>
References: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/16/40
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (for 3.12 only)
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
|