| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6
* 'release' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6: (123 commits)
dock: make dock driver not a module
ACPI: fix ia64 build warning
ACPI: hack around sysfs warning with link order
ACPI suspend: fix build warning when CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=n
intel_menlo: fix build warning
panasonic-laptop: fix build
ACPICA: Update version to 20080926
ACPICA: Add support for zero-length buffer-to-string conversions
ACPICA: New: Validation for predefined ACPI methods/objects
ACPICA: Fix for implicit return compatibility
ACPICA: Fixed a couple memory leaks associated with "implicit return"
ACPICA: Optimize buffer allocation procedure
ACPICA: Fix possible memory leak, error exit path
ACPICA: Fix fault after mem allocation failure in AML parser
ACPICA: Remove unused ACPI register bit definition
ACPICA: Update version to 20080829
ACPICA: Fix possible memory leak in acpi_ns_get_external_pathname
ACPICA: Cleanup for internal Reference Object
ACPICA: Update comments - no functional changes
ACPICA: Update for Reference ACPI_OPERAND_OBJECT
...
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
To avoid dock driver is loaded after other drivers like libata, let's
make dock driver not a module.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
There exists the following warning message will appear after the
following commit is merged.
>commit f2e969acd6d5981e6b1272810002558650d0736e
>Author: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
>Date: Mon Aug 11 14:57:50 2008 +0800
>ACPI: Add "acpi.power_nocheck=1" to disable power state check in
power transition:
>WARNING: at linux-2.6/fs/sysfs/dir.c:463 sysfs_add_one+0x33/0x39()
>sysfs: duplicate filename 'acpi' can not be created
>kobject_add_internal failed for acpi with -EEXIST, don't try to register
things with the same name in the same directory
In the above commit the "acpi.power_nocheck" module parameter is defined
in drivers/acpi/power.c file. As several module parameters using the same ACPI
prefix are defined in the different files(for example: power_nocheck is
defined in drivers/acpi/power.c,debug_layer/debug_level are defined in
drivers/acpi/debug.c) and there exists another module between them, the
warning message will be printed when using the current generic param code.
(In the function of param_sysfs_init).
In fact when ACPI is selected, the drivers/acpi/power will also be compiled
as built-in kernel.So this issue can be fixed by the following approach.
workaround it by adjusting the module link order in drivers/acpi/Makefile.
In such case the module parameter using the same prefix(ACPI) are put together
in the param data section.
Of course the better solution is to fix it in generic param code related
with sysfs.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c:27: warning: ‘acpi_target_sleep_state’ defined but not used
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| |\
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
Conflicts:
MAINTAINERS
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c
drivers/acpi/Kconfig
drivers/pnp/Makefile
drivers/pnp/quirks.c
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| |\ \
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Conflicts:
drivers/acpi/bay.c
drivers/acpi/dock.c
drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
As of version 2.0, ACPI can return 64-bit integers. The current
acpi_evaluate_integer only supports 64-bit integers on 64-bit platforms.
Change the argument to take a pointer to an acpi_integer so we support
64-bit integers on all platforms.
lenb: replaced use of "acpi_integer" with "unsigned long long"
lenb: fixed bug in acpi_thermal_trips_update()
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| |\ \ \ |
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
HP xw4600 Workstation is known to require the "old" (ie. compatible
with ACPI 1.0) suspend code ordering, so blacklist it for this
purpose.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Tested-by: John Brown <john.brown3@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
On some machines, like for example MSI Wind U100, the BIOS doesn't
enable ACPI before returning control to the OS, which sometimes
causes resume to fail. This is against the ACPI specification,
which clearly states that "When the platform is waking from an S1, S2
or S3 state, OSPM assumes the hardware is already in the ACPI mode
and will not issue an ACPI_ENABLE", but it won't hurt to check the
SCI_EN bit and enable ACPI during resume from S3 if this bit is not
set.
Fortunately, we already have acpi_enable() for that, so use it in the
resume code path, before executing _BFS, in analogy with the
resume-from-hibernation code path.
NOTE: We aren't supposed to set SCI_EN directly, because it's owned
by the hardware.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
According to the ACPI specification 2.0c and later, the 64-bit waking vector
should be cleared and the 32-bit waking vector should be used, unless we want
the wake-up code to be called by the BIOS in Protected Mode. Moreover, some
systems (for example HP dv5-1004nr) are known to fail to resume if the 64-bit
waking vector is used. Therefore, modify the code to clear the 64-bit waking
vector, for FACS version 1 or greater, and set the 32-bit one before suspend.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11368
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
The _TTS object is defined in the section 7.3 of acpi 3.0b spec.
The _TTS control method is executed by the OSPM at the beginning of
the sleep transition process for S1,S2, S3, S4, and orderly S5 shutdown.
OS will invoke _TTS before it has notified any native mode device drivers
of the sleep state transition. The target sleeping state value is passed to
the _TTS control method.
The _TTS control method is also executed by the OSPM at the end of
any sleep transition process when the system transitions to S0 from
S1, S2, S3, or S4. The _TTS object should be evaluated after it has
notified any native mode device drivers of the end of the sleep state
transition. The working state value (0) is passed to the _TTS control method.
So it is necessary to add the support for _TTS object. The _TTS object
will be evaluated if it exists.
At the same time a block notifier is added to the reboot notifier list so
that the _TTS object will also be evaluated when the system shutdown.
lenb: note that as of Sep 2008, I've not yet seen _TTS in any shipping BIOS.
So this patch is to future-proof Linux, rather than fix the installed base.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11132
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | |/ /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
The leading other brand OS appears to clear the WAK_STS flag on resume.
When rebooted, certain BIOSes assume that the system is actually
resuming if it's still set and so fail to reboot correctly. Make sure
that it's cleared at resume time.
Comment clarified as suggested by Bob Moore
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11634
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Romano Giannetti <romano.giannetti@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| |\ \ \ |
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Initially CONFIG_PM_SLEEP was defined as
CONFIG_SUSPEND || CONFIG_HIBERNATION and some ACPI code, most
importantly the code in drivers/acpi/main.c, was written with this
assumption. Currently, however, CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is also set when
CONFIG_XEN_SAVE_RESTORE is set.
This causes some compilation warnings to appear in
drivers/acpi/main.c if both CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION
are unset and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is set (this was impossible before).
To fix this problem, redefine CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP do depend directly
on CONFIG_SUSPEND || CONFIG_HIBERNATION, as originally intended, and
use it instead of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP in drivers/acpi/main.c, wherever
appropriate.
Additionally, move the acpi_target_sleep_state definition from under
the #ifdef to prevent compilation from failing in some cases.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9129
lenb: Note that overriding a critical trip point
may simply fool the user into thinking that they
have control that they do not actually have.
For it is EC firmware that decides when the EC
sends Linux temperature change events, and the
EC may or may not decide to send Linux these events
anywhere in the neighborhood of the fake
override trip points. Beware.
note also that thermal.nocrt is already available
to disable crtical trip point actios,
and thermal.crt=-1 is already available to
disabled critical trip points entirely.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
asus_hotk_get_info should return -ENODEV if the model is not supported.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10389
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
CONFIG_ACPI_TOSHIBA can =y when CONFIG_INPUT=m, so prevent that
combination and its subsequent build errors:
toshiba_acpi.c:(.text+0x3e877): undefined reference to `input_event'
toshiba_acpi.c:(.text+0x3e98a): undefined reference to `input_unregister_polled_device'
toshiba_acpi.c:(.text+0x3e994): undefined reference to `input_free_polled_device'
toshiba_acpi.c:(.init.text+0x21b4): undefined reference to `input_allocate_polled_device'
toshiba_acpi.c:(.init.text+0x2263): undefined reference to `input_register_polled_device'
make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Catch attempts to use of acpi_driver_data on pointers of wrong type.
akpm: rewritten to use proper C typechecking and remove the
"function"-used-as-lvalue thing.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
set_bit expects unsigned int, and we start with a u32 anyway.
drivers/acpi/toshiba_acpi.c:397:14: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different signedness)
drivers/acpi/toshiba_acpi.c:397:14: expected unsigned int [usertype] *word
drivers/acpi/toshiba_acpi.c:397:14: got int *<noident>
drivers/acpi/toshiba_acpi.c:399:14: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different signedness)
drivers/acpi/toshiba_acpi.c:399:14: expected unsigned int [usertype] *word
drivers/acpi/toshiba_acpi.c:399:14: got int *<noident>
drivers/acpi/toshiba_acpi.c:401:14: warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different signedness)
drivers/acpi/toshiba_acpi.c:401:14: expected unsigned int [usertype] *word
drivers/acpi/toshiba_acpi.c:401:14: got int *<noident>
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | |/ /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
CC: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| |\ \ \ |
|
| | |/ /
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | | |
The (1.0 inherited) separate length fields in the FADT are byte granular.
Further, PM1a/b may have distinct lengths (if using the v2 fields was
okay) and may live in distinct address spaces. acpi_tb_convert_fadt()
should account for all of these conditions.
Apart from these changes I'm puzzled by the fact that, not just for
acpi_gbl_xpm1{a,b}_enable, acpi_hw_low_level_{read,write}() get an
explicit size passed rather than using the size found in the passed GAS.
What happens on a platform that defines PM1{a,b} wider than 16 bits? Of
course, acpi_hw_low_level_{read,write}() at present are entirely
un-prepared to deal with sizes other than 8, 16, or 32, not to speak of a
non-zero bit_offset or access_width...
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| |\ \ \ |
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Tested-by: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
when there is no ECDT table and no _INI object for EC device, it will be
enabled before scanning ACPI device. But it is too late after the following
the commit is merged.
>commit 7752d5cfe3d11ca0bb9c673ec38bd78ba6578f8e
> Author: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
> Date: Fri Feb 15 01:27:20 2008 -0800
>x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources
After the above commit is merged, OS will check whether MCFG area is
reserved in ACPI motherboard resources by calling the function of
acpi_get_devices when there exists MCFG table. In the acpi_get_devices the _STA
object will be evaluated to check the status of the ACPI device. On some broken
BIOS the MYEC object of EC device is initialized as one, which indicates that
EC operation region is already accessible before enabling EC device.So on these
broken BIOS the EC operation region will be accessed in course of evaluating
the _STA object before enabling EC device, which causes that OS will print the
following warning messages:
>ACPI Error (evregion-0315): No handler for Region [EC__] (ffff88007f8145e8)
[EmbeddedControl] [20080609]
>ACPI Error (exfldio-0290): Region EmbeddedControl(3) has no handler [20080321]
>ACPI Error (psparse-0530): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.SBRG.
EC__.BAT1._STA] (Node ffff81013fc17a00), AE_NOT_EXIST
>ACPI Error (uteval-0233): Method execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.SBRG.EC__.BAT1.
_STA] (Node ffff81013fc17a00), AE_NOT_EXIST
Although the above warning message is harmless, it looks confusing.
So it is necessary to enable EC device as early as possible.Maybe it is
appropriate to enable it immediately after ACPI full initialization.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11255
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11374
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11660
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Acked-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
It is easier and faster to do transaction directly from interrupt context
rather than waking control thread.
Also, cleaner GPE storm avoidance is implemented.
References: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9998
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10919
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11309
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11549
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Tested-by: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| |\ \ \ \
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Conflicts:
drivers/acpi/osl.c
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
lenb: stripped patch down to what still applied to new dock.c
Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
add a sysfs file to present dock type. Suggested by Holger.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
an ATA bay can be in a dock and itself can be ejected separately.
This patch handles such eject bay. Found by Holger.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
dock's uevent reported itself, not ata. It might be difficult to find an
ata device just according to a dock. This patch introduces docking ops
for each device in a dock. when docking, dock driver can send device
specific uevent. This should help dock station too (not just bay)
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
dock driver can handle ata(bay) hotplug now. dock driver already handles
_EJ0 and _STA, so remove them. Also libata doesn't need register
notification handler anymore.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
The hotplug notification handler and drivers' notification handler all
run in one workqueue. Before hotplug removes an acpi device, the
device driver's notification handler is already be recorded to run just
after global notification handler. After hotplug notification handler
runs, acpica will notice a NULL notification handler and crash.
So now we run run hotplug in another workqueue and wait
for all acpi notication handlers finish.
This was found in battery hotplug, but actually all
hotplug can be affected.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
The battery driver already registers notification handler.
To avoid registering notification handler again,
introduce a notifier chain in global system notifier handler
and use it in dock driver.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Make the dock driver support bay and battery hotplug.
They are all regarded as dock, so handling can be unified.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
support _LCK method, which is a optional method for hotplug
lenb: we have not seen _LCK used in the field yet
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | |
commit 2a7feab28d3fc060d320eaba192e49dad1079b7e introduces a bug.
My thinkpad actually will send an eject_request and we should follow the
eject process to finish the eject, otherwise system still thinks the bay
is present.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| | |/ / /
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
In some BIOSes, every _STA method call will send a notification again,
this cause freeze. And in some BIOSes, it appears _STA should be called
after _DCK. This tries to avoid calls _STA, and still keep the device
present check.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10431
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| |\ \ \ \ |
|
| | | |/ /
| | |/| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
reflect the actual state entered in dev->last_state, when actaul state entered
is different from intended one.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| |\ \ \ \ |
|
| | |/ / /
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
According to ACPI 3.0, FADT.flags.RESET_REG_SUP indicates
whether the ACPI reboot mechanism is supported.
However, some boxes have this bit clear, have a valid
ACPI_RESET_REG & RESET_VALUE, and ACPI reboot is the only
mechanism that works for them after S3.
This suggests that other operating systems may not be checking
the RESET_REG_SUP bit, and are using other means to decide
whether to use the ACPI reboot mechanism or not.
Here we stop checking RESET_REG_SUP.
Instead, When acpi reboot is requested,
only the reset_register is checked. If the following
conditions are met, it indicates that the reset register is supported.
a. reset_register is not zero
b. the access width is eight
c. the bit_offset is zero
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7299
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1148
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| |\ \ \ \ |
|
| | |/ / /
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
Power button is used
don't enable control method power button as wakeup device
when Fixed Power button is used.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10503
Tested-by: walken@zoy.org <walken@zoy.org>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| |\ \ \ \ |
|
| | |/ / /
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | |
On some broken BIOS the ACPI object in EC _REG method can't be found in
ACPI namespace, which causes that the status code of AE_NOT_FOUND is returned by
the EC _REG object. In such case the EC device can't be initialized correctly,
which causes that battery/AC adapter can't work normally. As the EC address
space handler is not removed and the memory pointed by its input argument is
already free, sometimes the kernel will also be panic when EC internal register
is still accessed. But the windows can work well on such broken BIOS.
Maybe it will be reasonable that OS ignores the AE_NOT_FOUND error
returned by the EC _REG object and continues to initialize EC device
on some broken BIOS.
For example: the ACPI object in EC _REG method can't be found and status error
code is AE_NOT_FOUND.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8953
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10237
lenb: we may find a more general solution to this in the future.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
|
| |\ \ \ \ |
|