aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/acpi/proc.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* ACPI / PM: Use device wakeup flags for handling ACPI wakeup devicesRafael J. Wysocki2011-01-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There are ACPI devices (buttons and the laptop lid) that can wake up the system from sleep states and have no "physical" companion devices. The ACPI subsystem uses two flags, wakeup.state.enabled and wakeup.flags.always_enabled, for handling those devices, but they are not accessible through the standard device wakeup infrastructure. User space can only control them via the /proc/acpi/wakeup interface that is not really convenient (e.g. the way in which devices are enabled to wake up the system is not portable between different systems, because it requires one to know the devices' "names" used in the system's ACPI tables). To address this problem, use standard device wakeup flags instead of the special ACPI flags for handling those devices. In particular, use device_set_wakeup_capable() to mark the ACPI wakeup devices during initialization and use device_set_wakeup_enable() to allow or disallow them to wake up the system from sleep states. Rework the /proc/acpi/wakeup interface to take these changes into account. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI / PM: Do not enable multiple devices to wake up simultaneouslyRafael J. Wysocki2011-01-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If a device is enabled to wake up the system from sleep states via /proc/acpi/wakeup and there are other devices associated with the same wakeup GPE, all of these devices are automatically enabled to wake up the system. This isn't correct, because the fact the GPE is shared need not imply that wakeup power has to be enabled for all the devices at the same time (i.e. it is possible that one device will have its wakeup power enabled and it will wake up the system from a sleep state if the shared wakeup GPE is enabled, while another device having its wakeup power disabled will not wake up the system even though the GPE is enabled). Rework acpi_system_write_wakeup_device() so that it only enables wakeup for one device at a time. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: remove deprecated ACPI procfs I/FZhang Rui2010-08-15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Rmove deprecated ACPI procfs I/F, including /proc/acpi/debug_layer /proc/acpi/debug_level /proc/acpi/info /proc/acpi/dsdt /proc/acpi/fadt /proc/acpi/sleep because the sysfs I/F is already available and has been working well for years. Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* Fix misspellings of "separate" in strings.Adam Buchbinder2010-02-04
| | | | | | | | Some string messages misspell "separate"; this fixes them. No change in functionality. Signed-off-by: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
* ACPI: clean up video.c boundary checks and typesArjan van de Ven2009-10-28
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | proc.c and video.c are a bit sloppy around types and style, confusing gcc for a new feature that'll be in 2.6.33 and will cause a warning on the current code. This patch changes if (foo + 1 > sizeof bar) into if (foo >= sizeof(bar)) which is more kernel-style. it also changes a variable in proc.c to unsigned; it gets assigned a value from an unsigned type, and is then only compared for > not for negative, so using unsigned is just outright the right type Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: Fix bound checks for copy_from_user in the acpi /proc codeArjan van de Ven2009-10-03
| | | | | | | | | | | | The ACPI /proc write() code takes an unsigned length argument like any write() function, but then assigned it to a *signed* integer called "len". Only after this is a sanity check for len done to make it not larger than 4. Due to the type change a len < 0 is in principle also possible; this patch adds a check for this. Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: convert acpi_device_lock spinlock to mutexShaohua Li2009-04-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | Convert acpi_device_lock to a mutex to avoid a potential race upon access to /proc/acpi/wakeup Delete the lock entirely in wakeup.c since it is not necessary (and can not sleep) Found-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* ACPI: call acpi_sleep_proc_init() explicitly rather than as initcallBjorn Helgaas2009-03-27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This patch makes acpi_init() call acpi_sleep_proc_init() directly. Previously, acpi_sleep_proc_init() was a late_initcall (sequence 7), apparently to make sure that the /proc hierarchy already exists: 2003/02/13 12:38:03-06:00 mochel acpi sleep: demote sleep proc file creation. - Make acpi_sleep_proc_init() a late_initcall(), and not called from acpi_sleep_init(). This guarantees that the acpi proc hierarchy is at least there when we create the dang file. This should no longer be an issue because acpi_bus_init() (called early in acpi_init()) creates acpi_root_dir (/proc/acpi). Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* Merge branch 'alarm' into releaseLen Brown2009-01-09
|
* ACPICA: create acpica/ directoryLen Brown2009-01-09
also, delete sleep/ and delete ACPI_CFLAGS from Makefile Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>