litmus-rt.git - The LITMUS^RT kernel.

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age
*	crypto: sha512 - Switch to shash	Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger	2008-12-24
\| \| \| \| \| \| \|	This patch changes sha512 and sha384 to the new shash interface. Signed-off-by: Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger <ken@codelabs.ch> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
*	crypto: sha512 - Move message schedule W[80] to static percpu area	Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger	2008-12-24
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	The message schedule W (u64[80]) is too big for the stack. In order for this algorithm to be used with shash it is moved to a static percpu area. Signed-off-by: Adrian-Ken Rueegsegger <ken@codelabs.ch> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
*	[CRYPTO] all: Clean up init()/fini()	Kamalesh Babulal	2008-04-20
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:40:36PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote: > Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > This patch cleanups the crypto code, replaces the init() and fini() > > with the <algorithm name>_init/_fini > > This part ist OK. > > > or init/fini_<algorithm name> (if the > > <algorithm name>_init/_fini exist) > > Having init_foo and foo_init won't be a good thing, will it? I'd start > confusing them. > > What about foo_modinit instead? Thanks for the suggestion, the init() is replaced with <algorithm name>_mod_init () and fini () is replaced with <algorithm name>_mod_fini. Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
*	[CRYPTO] sha512: Rename sha512 to sha512_generic	Jan Glauber	2008-04-20
	Rename sha512 to sha512_generic and add a MODULE_ALIAS for sha512 so all sha512 implementations can be loaded automatically. Keep the broken tabs so git recognizes this as a rename. Signed-off-by: Jan Glauber <jang@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>