aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/x86/mm/memtest.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* x86, memblock: Replace e820_/_early string with memblock_Yinghai Lu2010-08-27
| | | | | | | | | | 1.include linux/memblock.h directly. so later could reduce e820.h reference. 2 this patch is done by sed scripts mainly -v2: use MEMBLOCK_ERROR instead of -1ULL or -1UL Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
* x86: memtest: use pointers of equal type for comparisonThomas Gleixner2009-06-11
| | | | | | | | | | | Commit c9690998ef48ffefeccb91c70a7739eebdea57f9 (x86: memtest: remove 64-bit division) introduced following compile warning: arch/x86/mm/memtest.c: In function 'memtest': arch/x86/mm/memtest.c:56: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast arch/x86/mm/memtest.c:58: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
* x86: memtest: remove 64-bit divisionAndreas Herrmann2009-06-08
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Using gcc 3.3.5 a "make allmodconfig" + "CONFIG_KVM=n" triggers a build error: arch/x86/mm/built-in.o(.init.text+0x43f7): In function `__change_page_attr': arch/x86/mm/pageattr.c:114: undefined reference to `__udivdi3' make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 The culprit turned out to be a division in arch/x86/mm/memtest.c For more info see this thread: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124416232620683 The patch entirely removes the division that caused the build error. [ Impact: build fix with certain GCC versions ] Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <20090608170939.GB12431@alberich.amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* x86: make "memtest" like "memtest=17"Yinghai Lu2009-03-06
| | | | | | | | | | Impact: make boot command line "memtest" do one loop by default So don't need to guess many patterns in one loop. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> LKML-Reference: <49B10532.3020105@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* x86: memtest: add additional (regular) test patternsAndreas Herrmann2009-02-25
| | | | | Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* x86: memtest: wipe out test pattern from memoryAndreas Herrmann2009-02-25
| | | | | Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* x86: memtest: adapt log messagesAndreas Herrmann2009-02-25
| | | | | | | | | | - print test pattern instead of pattern number, - show pattern as stored in memory, - use proper priority flags, - consistent use of u64 throughout the code Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* x86: memtest: cleanup memtest functionAndreas Herrmann2009-02-25
| | | | | | | Impact: code cleanup Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* x86: memtest: introduce array to select memtest patternsAndreas Herrmann2009-02-25
| | | | | | | Impact: code cleanup Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* x86: memtest: reuse test patterns when memtest parameter exceeds number of ↵Andreas Herrmann2009-02-25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | available patterns Impact: fix unexpected behaviour when pattern number is out of range Current implementation provides 4 patterns for memtest. The code doesn't check whether the memtest parameter value exceeds the maximum pattern number. Instead the memtest code pretends to test with non-existing patterns, e.g. when booting with memtest=10 I've observed the following ... early_memtest: pattern num 10 0000001000 - 0000006000 pattern 0 ... 0000001000 - 0000006000 pattern 1 ... 0000001000 - 0000006000 pattern 2 ... 0000001000 - 0000006000 pattern 3 ... 0000001000 - 0000006000 pattern 4 ... 0000001000 - 0000006000 pattern 5 ... 0000001000 - 0000006000 pattern 6 ... 0000001000 - 0000006000 pattern 7 ... 0000001000 - 0000006000 pattern 8 ... 0000001000 - 0000006000 pattern 9 ... But in fact Linux didn't test anything for patterns > 4 as the default case in memtest() is to leave the function. I suggest to use the memtest parameter as the number of tests to be performed and to re-iterate over all existing patterns. Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* x86: memtest fix use of reserve_early()Daniele Calore2008-10-22
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Hi all, Wrong usage of 2nd parameter in reserve_early call. 66/75: reserve_early(start_bad, last_bad - start_bad, "BAD RAM"); ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ The correct way is to use 'end' address and not 'size'. As a bonus a fix to the printk format. Signed-off-by: Daniele Calore <orkaan@orkaan.org> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
* x86: seperate memtest from init_64.cYinghai Lu2008-07-18
it's separate functionality that deserves its own file. This also prepares 32-bit memtest support. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
generated by cgit v1.2.2 (git 2.25.0) at 2024-11-29 20:10:40 -0500