aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/x86/include/asm/mutex_32.h
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* x86: Simplify __HAVE_ARCH_CMPXCHG testsBorislav Petkov2014-07-11
| | | | | | | | | | | Both the 32-bit and 64-bit cmpxchg.h header define __HAVE_ARCH_CMPXCHG and there's ifdeffery which checks it. But since both bitness define it, we can just as well move it up to the main cmpxchg header and simpify a bit of code in doing that. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140711104338.GB17083@pd.tnic Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
* arch: Make __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval return whether fastpath succeeded or notMaarten Lankhorst2013-06-26
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This will allow me to call functions that have multiple arguments if fastpath fails. This is required to support ticket mutexes, because they need to be able to pass an extra argument to the fail function. Originally I duplicated the functions, by adding __mutex_fastpath_lock_retval_arg. This ended up being just a duplication of the existing function, so a way to test if fastpath was called ended up being better. This also cleaned up the reservation mutex patch some by being able to call an atomic_set instead of atomic_xchg, and making it easier to detect if the wrong unlock function was previously used. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org Cc: robclark@gmail.com Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: daniel@ffwll.ch Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130620113105.4001.83929.stgit@patser Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
* x86: Fix ASM_X86__ header guardsH. Peter Anvin2008-10-23
| | | | | | | | | Change header guards named "ASM_X86__*" to "_ASM_X86_*" since: a. the double underscore is ugly and pointless. b. no leading underscore violates namespace constraints. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
* x86, um: ... and asm-x86 moveAl Viro2008-10-23
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>