aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/blackfin/mm/sram-alloc.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAge
* Blackfin: mass clean up of copyright/licensing infoRobin Getz2009-10-07
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Bill Gatliff & David Brownell pointed out we were missing some copyrights, and licensing terms in some of the files in ./arch/blackfin, so this fixes things, and cleans them up. It also removes: - verbose GPL text(refer to the top level ./COPYING file) - file names (you are looking at the file) - bug url (it's in the ./MAINTAINERS file) - "or later" on GPL-2, when we did not have that right It also allows some Blackfin-specific assembly files to be under a BSD like license (for people to use them outside of Linux). Signed-off-by: Robin Getz <robin.getz@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
* Blackfin: push SRAM locks down into related ifdefsMike Frysinger2009-09-16
| | | | | | | | Rather than defining the locks and initializing them all the time, only do so when we actually need them (i.e. the SRAM regions exist). This avoids dead data and code bloat during runtime. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
* percpu: use DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED()Tejun Heo2009-06-24
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There are a few places where ___cacheline_aligned* is used with DEFINE_PER_CPU(). Use DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED() instead. DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED() applies alignment only on SMPs. While all other converted places used _in_smp variant or only get compiled for SMP, net/rds used unconditional ____cacheline_aligned. I don't see any reason these data structures should be aligned on UP and thus converted together. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Andy Grover <andy.grover@oracle.com>
* Blackfin: document the lsl variants of the L1 allocatorMike Frysinger2009-06-12
| | | | | | | Make sure the meaning of "lsl" is covered somewhere and it is clear why we somewhat duplicate the sram alloc/free functions. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
* Blackfin: fix handling of initial L1 reservationGraf Yang2009-06-12
| | | | | | | | This restores some L1 reservation logic that was lost during the Blackfin SMP merge. Signed-off-by: Graf Yang <graf.yang@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
* Blackfin: merge sram init functionsGraf Yang2009-06-12
| | | | | | | | | Now that the sram_init() function exists only to call the bfin_sram_init() after the punting of the reserve_pda() function, simply merge the two to avoid pointless overhead. Signed-off-by: Graf Yang <graf.yang@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
* proc 2/2: remove struct proc_dir_entry::ownerAlexey Dobriyan2009-03-30
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Setting ->owner as done currently (pde->owner = THIS_MODULE) is racy as correctly noted at bug #12454. Someone can lookup entry with NULL ->owner, thus not pinning enything, and release it later resulting in module refcount underflow. We can keep ->owner and supply it at registration time like ->proc_fops and ->data. But this leaves ->owner as easy-manipulative field (just one C assignment) and somebody will forget to unpin previous/pin current module when switching ->owner. ->proc_fops is declared as "const" which should give some thoughts. ->read_proc/->write_proc were just fixed to not require ->owner for protection. rmmod'ed directories will be empty and return "." and ".." -- no harm. And directories with tricky enough readdir and lookup shouldn't be modular. We definitely don't want such modular code. Removing ->owner will also make PDE smaller. So, let's nuke it. Kudos to Jeff Layton for reminding about this, let's say, oversight. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12454 Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
* Blackfin arch: smp patch cleanup from LKML reviewGraf Yang2009-01-07
| | | | | | | | | 1. Use inline get_l1_... functions instead of macro 2. Fix compile issue about smp barrier functions Signed-off-by: Graf Yang <graf.yang@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
* Blackfin arch: fix unused warning for some blackfin derivativesMike Frysinger2008-11-18
| | | | | | Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
* Blackfin arch: SMP supporting patchset: Blackfin kernel and memory ↵Graf Yang2008-11-18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | management code Blackfin dual core BF561 processor can support SMP like features. https://docs.blackfin.uclinux.org/doku.php?id=linux-kernel:smp-like In this patch, we provide SMP extend to Blackfin kernel and memory management code Singed-off-by: Graf Yang <graf.yang@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
* Blackfin arch: fix bug - shared lib function in L2 failed be calledJie Zhang2008-10-28
| | | | | | | | Allow user space to access L2 SRAM. Signed-off-by: Jie Zhang <jie.zhang@analog.com> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>
* Blackfin arch: rename blackfin_sram.c to sram-alloc.cRobin Getz2008-10-08
rename blackfin_sram.c to sram-alloc.c (we know it is a blackfin file, since it is in arch/blackfin) - and there is no "driver" code in there, it is just an allocator/deallocator for L1 and L2 sram. Also fix a problem that checkpatch pointed out Signed-off-by: Robin Getz <rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@kernel.org>