| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
__FUNCTION__ is gcc-specific, use __func__
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since the number of dma channels varies between pxa25x and pxa27x, it
introduces some specific code in dma.c. This patch moves the specific
code to pxa25x.c and pxa27x.c and makes dma.c more generic.
1. add pxa_init_dma() for dma initialization, the number of channels
are passed in by the argument
2. add a "prio" field to the "struct pxa_dma_channel" for the channel
priority, and is initialized in pxa_init_dma()
3. use a general priority comparison with the channels "prio" field so
to remove the processor specific pxa_for_each_dma_prio macro, this
is not lightning fast as the original one, but it is acceptable as
it happens when requesting dma, which is usually not so performance
critical
Signed-off-by: eric miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Untested, but this should fix up the bulk of the totally mechanical
issues, and should make the actual detail fixing easier.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Patch from Nicolas Pitre
Intel PXA27x developers manual section 5.4.1.1 lists a priority
distribution for the DMA channels differently than what the code
currently assumes. This patch fixes that.
Noticed by Simon Vogl <vogl@soft.uni-linz.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
|
|
|
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
|
