| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
acpi_pci_set_power_state() uses dev_info() to print diagnostic
messages regarding ACPI power state changes of devices, but that
results in too much not really interesting output into the kernel
log in some cases.
For this reason, change it to use dev_dbg() instead and prevent
kernel log from being spammed.
[rjw: Changelog]
References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60636
Suggested-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Now that acpiphp_check_bridge() always enumerates devices behind the
bridge, there is no need to do that for each sub-bridge anymore like
it is done in the current ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) code.
Given this we don't need check_sub_bridges() anymore, so drop that
function completely.
This also simplifies the ACPIPHP code a bit.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Do not acquire bridge_mutex around the addition of a slot to its
bridge's list of slots and arount the addition of a function to
its slot's list of functions, because that doesn't help anything
right now (those lists are walked without any locking anyway).
However, acquire bridge_mutex around the list walk in
acpiphp_remove_slots() and use list_for_each_entry() there,
because we terminate the walk as soon as we find the first matching
entry. This prevents that list walk from colliding with bridge
addition and removal.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Notice that functions enable_device() and disable_device() cannot
fail and their return values are ignored in the majority of places,
so redefine them as void and use the opportunity to change their
names to enable_slot() and disable_slot(), respectively, which much
better reflects what they do.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There is no need for a temporary variable and all the tricks with
ternary operators in acpiphp_get_(latch)|(adapter)_status(). Change
those functions to be a bit more straightforward.
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Drop some unused symbols from acpiphp.h and redefine SLOT_ENABLED
(which is the only slot flag now) as 1.
[rjw: Redefinition of SLOT_ENABLED, changelog]
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The current implementation of acpiphp_check_bridge() is pretty dumb:
- It enables a slot if it's not enabled and the slot status is
ACPI_STA_ALL.
- It disables a slot if it's enabled and the slot status is not
ACPI_STA_ALL.
This behavior is not sufficient to handle the Thunderbolt daisy
chaining case properly, however, because in that case the bus
behind the already enabled slot needs to be rescanned for new
devices.
For this reason, modify acpiphp_check_bridge() so that slots are
disabled and stopped if they are not in the ACPI_STA_ALL state.
For slots in the ACPI_STA_ALL state, devices behind them that don't
respond are trimmed using a new function, trim_stale_devices(),
introduced specifically for this purpose. That function walks
the given bus and checks each device on it. If the device doesn't
respond, it is assumed to be gone and is removed.
Once all of the stale devices directy behind the slot have been
removed, acpiphp_check_bridge() will start looking for new devices
that might have appeared on the given bus. It will do that even if
the slot is already enabled (SLOT_ENABLED is set for it).
In addition to that, make the bus check notification ignore
SLOT_ENABLED and go for enable_device() directly if bridge is NULL,
so that devices behind the slot are re-enumerated in that case too.
This change is based on earlier patches from Kirill A Shutemov
and Mika Westerberg.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently, enable_device() checks the return value of pci_scan_slot()
and returns immediately if that's 0 (meaning that no new functions
have been found in the slot). However, if one of the functions in
the slot is a bridge, some new devices may appear below it even if
the bridge itself is present continuously, so it generally is
necessary to do the rescan anyway just in case. [In particular,
that's necessary with the Thunderbolt daisy chaining in which case
new devices may be connected to the existing ones down the chain.]
The correctness of this change relies on the ability of
pcibios_resource_survey_bus() to detect if it has already been called
for the given bus and to skip it if so. Failure to do that will lead
to resource allocation conflicts.
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
With Thunderbolt you can daisy chain devices: connect new devices to
an already plugged one. In that case the "hotplug slot" is already
enabled, but we still want to look for new PCI devices behind it.
Reuse enable_device() to scan for new PCI devices on enabled slots
and push the SLOT_ENABLED check up into acpiphp_enable_slot().
[rjw: Rebased, modified the changelog]
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The ACPI-based PCI hotplug (acpiphp) core code need not and really
should not execute _PS0 and _PS3 directly for devices it handles.
First of all, it is not necessary to put devices into D3 after
acpi_bus_trim() has walked through them, because
acpi_device_unregister() invoked by it puts each device into D3cold
before returning. Thus after disable_device() the slot should be
powered down already.
Second, calling _PS0 directly on ACPI device objects may not be
appropriate, because it may require power resources to be set up in
a specific way in advance and that must be taken care of by the ACPI
core. Thus modify acpiphp_bus_add() to power up the device using
the appropriate interface after it has run acpi_bus_scan() on its
handle.
After that, the functions executing _PS0 and _PS3, power_on_slot()
and power_off_slot(), are not necessary any more, so drop them
and update the code calling them accordingly. Also drop the
function flags related to device power states, since they aren't
useful any more too.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Modify handle_hotplug_event() to avoid queing up the execution of
handle_hotplug_event_work_fn() as a work item on kacpi_hotplug_wq
for non-hotplug events, such as ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_WAKE. Move
the code printing diagnostic messages for those events into
handle_hotplug_event().
In addition to that, remove the bogus comment about how the core
should distinguish between hotplug and non-hotplug events and
queue them up on different workqueues. The core clearly cannot
know in advance what events will be interesting to the given
caller of acpi_install_notify_handler().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Both acpiphp_disable_slot() and acpiphp_eject_slot() are always
called together so instead of calling each separately we can
consolidate them into one function acpiphp_disable_and_eject_slot()
that does both (but it will return success on _EJ0 failures that
were ignored in the majority of call sites anyway).
[rjw: Rebased plus minor tweaks]
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Two checks in check_hotplug_bridge() are redundant (they have been
done by the caller already), so drop them.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The acpiphp_bus_trim() and acpiphp_bus_add() functions need not
return error codes that are never checked, so redefine them and
simplify them a bit.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To avoid chasing more pointers than necessary in some situations,
move the bridge pointer from struct acpiphp_slot to struct
acpiphp_func (and call it 'parent') and add a bus pointer to
struct acpiphp_slot.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The handle field in struct acpiphp_bridge is only used by
acpiphp_enumerate_slots(), but in that function the local handle
variable can be used instead, so make that happen and drop handle
from struct acpiphp_bridge.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The ACPI handle stored in struct acpiphp_func is also stored in the
struct acpiphp_context object containing it and it is trivial to get
from a struct acpiphp_func pointer to the handle field of the outer
struct acpiphp_context.
Hence, the handle field of struct acpiphp_func is redundant, so drop
it and provide a helper function, func_to_handle(), allowing it
users to get the ACPI handle for the given struct acpiphp_func
pointer.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since there has to be a struct acpiphp_func object for every struct
acpiphp_context created by register_slot(), the struct acpiphp_func
one can be embedded into the struct acpiphp_context one, which allows
some code simplifications to be made.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The only bridge flag used by the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP)
code is BRIDGE_HAS_EJ0, but it is only used by the event handling
function hotplug_event() and if that flag is set, the corresponding
function flag FUNC_HAS_EJ0 is set as well, so that bridge flag is
redundant.
For this reason, drop BRIDGE_HAS_EJ0 and all code referring to it
and since it is the only bridge flag defined, drop the flags field
from struct acpiphp_bridge entirely.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the slot unique number is passed as an additional argument to
acpiphp_register_hotplug_slot(), the 'sun' field in struct
acpiphp_slot is only used by ibm_[s|g]et_attention_status(),
but then it's more efficient to store it in struct slot.
Thus move the 'sun' field from struct acpiphp_slot to struct slot
changing its data type to unsigned int in the process, and redefine
acpiphp_register_hotplug_slot() to take the slot number as separate
argument.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rework register_slot() to create a struct acpiphp_func object for
every function it is called for and to create acpiphp slots for all
of them. Although acpiphp_register_hotplug_slot() is only called for
the slots whose functions are identified as "ejectable", so that user
space can manipulate them, the ACPIPHP notify handler,
handle_hotplug_event(), is now installed for all of the registered
functions (that aren't dock stations) and hotplug events may be
handled for all of them.
As a result, essentially, all PCI bridges represented by objects in
the ACPI namespace are now going to be "hotplug" bridges and that may
affect resources allocation in general, although it shouldn't lead to
problems.
This allows the code to be simplified substantially and addresses
the problem where bus check or device check notifications for some
PCI bridges or devices are not handled, because those devices are
not recognized as "ejectable" or there appear to be no "ejectable"
devices under those bridges.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To make the code in register_slot() a bit easier to follow, change
the way the slot allocation part is organized. Drop one local
variable that's not used any more after that modification.
This code change should not lead to any changes in behavior.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since the func pointer in struct acpiphp_context can always be used
instead of the func pointer in struct acpiphp_bridge, drop the
latter.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are separate handling event functions for hotplug bridges and
for hotplug functions, but they may be combined into one common
hotplug event handling function which simplifies the code slightly.
That also allows a theoretical bug to be dealt with which in
principle may occur if a hotplug bridge is on a dock station, because
in that case the bridge-specific notification should be used instead
of the function-specific one, but the dock station always uses the
latter.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Modify handle_hotplug_event() to pass the entire context object
(instead of its fields individually) to work functions started by it.
This change makes the subsequent consolidation of the event handling
work functions a bit more straightforward.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Using the hotplug context objects introduced previously rework the
ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) core code to get to acpiphp_bridge
objects associated with hotplug bridges from those context objects
rather than from the global list of hotplug bridges.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Using the hotplug context objects introduced previously rework the
ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) core code so that all notifications
for ACPI device objects corresponding to the hotplug PCI devices are
handled by one function, handle_hotplug_event(), which recognizes
whether it has to handle a bridge or a function.
In addition to code size reduction it allows some ugly pieces of code
where notify handlers have to be uninstalled and installed again to
go away. Moreover, it fixes a theoretically possible race between
handle_hotplug_event() and free_bridge() tearing down data structures
for the same handle.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When either a new hotplug bridge or a new hotplug function is added
by the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) code, attach a context object
to its ACPI handle to store hotplug-related information in it. To
start with, put the handle's bridge and function pointers into that
object. Count references to the context objects and drop them when
they are not needed any more.
First of all, this makes it possible to find out if the given bridge
has been registered as a function already in a much more
straightforward way and acpiphp_bridge_handle_to_function() can be
dropped (Yay!).
This also will allow some more simplifications to be made going
forward.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When a new ACPIPHP function is added by register_slot() and the
notify handler cannot be installed for it, register_slot() returns an
error status without cleaning up, which causes the entire namespace
walk in acpiphp_enumerate_slots() to be aborted, although it still
may be possible to successfully install the function notify handler
for other device objects under the given brigde.
To address this issue make register_slot() return success after
a new function has been added, even if the addition of the notify
handler for it has failed.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The acpiphp_enumerate_slots() function is now split into two parts,
acpiphp_enumerate_slots() proper and init_bridge_misc() which is
only called by the former. If these functions are combined,
it is possible to make the code easier to follow and to clean up
the error handling (to prevent memory leaks on error from
happening in particular), so do that.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since acpi_pci_slot_enumerate() and acpiphp_enumerate_slots() can get
the ACPI device handle they need from bus->bridge, it is not
necessary to pass that handle to them as an argument.
Drop the second argument of acpi_pci_slot_enumerate() and
acpiphp_enumerate_slots(), rework them to obtain the ACPI handle
from bus->bridge and make acpi_pci_add_bus() and
acpi_pci_remove_bus() entirely symmetrical.
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
|
| |\
| |
| |
| | |
Subsequent commits depend on the 'acpi-cleanup' material.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The local variable id in dock_add() is not necessary, so drop it.
While we're at it, use an initializer to clear the local variable ds
and drop the memset() used for this purpose.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The only user of the ACPI dock notifier chain is the ACPI-based PCI
hotplug (acpiphp) driver that uses it to carry out post-dock fixups
needed by some systems with broken _DCK. However, it is not
necessary to use a separate notifier chain for that, as it can be
simply replaced with a new callback in struct acpi_dock_ops.
For this reason, add a new .fixup() callback to struct acpi_dock_ops
and make hotplug_dock_devices() execute it for all dock devices with
hotplug operations registered. Accordingly, make acpiphp point that
callback to the function carrying out the post-dock fixups and
do not register a separate dock notifier for each device
registering dock operations. Finally, drop the ACPI dock notifier
chain that has no more users.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Since commit 94add0f (ACPI / dock: Initialize ACPI dock subsystem
upfront) the ACPI dock driver cannot be a module, so
CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK_MODULE is never set. For this reason, simplify
the preprocessor conditional in include/acpi/acpi_drivers.h
referring to that sybbol unnecessarily.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The function creating and registering dock station objects,
dock_add(), leaks memory if there's an error after it's walked
the ACPI namespace calling find_dock_devices(), because it doesn't
free the list of dependent devices it's just created in those cases.
Fix that issue by adding the missing code to free the list of
dependent devices on errors.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
There are no users of the ACPI bus notifier call chain,
acpi_bus_notify_list, any more, so drop it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The ACPI dock driver uses register_acpi_bus_notifier() which
installs a notifier triggered globally for all system notifications.
That first of all is inefficient, because the dock driver is only
interested in notifications associated with the devices it handles,
but it has to handle all system notifies for all devices. Moreover,
it does that even if no docking stations are present in the system
(CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK set is sufficient for that to happen). Besides,
that is inconvenient, because it requires the driver to do extra work
for each notification to find the target dock station object.
For these reasons, rework the dock driver to install a notify
handler individually for each dock station in the system using
acpi_install_notify_handler(). This allows the dock station
object to be passed directly to the notify handler and makes it
possible to simplify the dock driver quite a bit. It also
reduces the overhead related to the handling of all system
notifies when CONFIG_ACPI_DOCK is set.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Make dock_init_hotplug() and dock_release_hotplug() slightly simpler
and move some checks in those functions to the code paths where they
are needed.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
If there are indirect dependencies between devices in a dock
station's dependent devices list, they may be broken if the devices
are removed in the same order in which they have been added.
For this reason, make the code in handle_eject_request() walk the
list of dependent devices in reverse order.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Since acpi_walk_namespace() calls find_dock_devices() during tree
pre-order visit, the latter doesn't need to add devices whose
parents have _EJD pointing to the docking station to the list of
that station's dependent devices, because those parents are going to
be added to that list anyway and the removal of a parent will take
care of the removal of its children in those cases.
For this reason, rework find_dock_devices() to only call
add_dock_dependent_device() for devices whose _EJD point directy to
the docking station represented by its context argument and simplify
it slightly.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The only existing user of the hp_lock mutex in struct dock_station,
hotplug_dock_devices(), is always called under acpi_scan_lock and
cannot race with another instance of itself, so drop the mutex
which is not necessary.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Use the new helper functions introduced previously to simplify the
ACPI-based PCI hotplug (acpiphp) driver.
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Use helper functions introduced previously to simplify the ACPI dock
driver.
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Functions acpi_dock_match() and acpi_bay_match() in scan.c can be
shared with dock.c to reduce code duplication, so export them as
global functions.
Also add a new function acpi_ata_match() to check whether an ACPI
device object represents an ATA device.
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Introduce two helper functions, acpi_evaluate_ej0() and
acpi_evaluate_lck(), that will execute the _EJ0 and _LCK ACPI
control methods, respectively, and use them to simplify the
ACPI scan code.
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Introduce helper function acpi_execute_simple_method() and use it in
a number of places to simplify code.
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Introduce helper function acpi_has_method() and use it in a number
of places to simplify code.
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
The return value of dock_create_acpi_device() is not used at all,
so change its signature to return void and simplify the
implementation of it.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Mark all initialization functions with __init to reduce runtime
memory consumption.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
