aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
-rw-r--r--fs/jbd/transaction.c57
1 files changed, 55 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/jbd/transaction.c b/fs/jbd/transaction.c
index 67ff2024c23c..8dee32007500 100644
--- a/fs/jbd/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/jbd/transaction.c
@@ -1648,12 +1648,42 @@ out:
1648 return; 1648 return;
1649} 1649}
1650 1650
1651/*
1652 * journal_try_to_free_buffers() could race with journal_commit_transaction()
1653 * The latter might still hold the a count on buffers when inspecting
1654 * them on t_syncdata_list or t_locked_list.
1655 *
1656 * journal_try_to_free_buffers() will call this function to
1657 * wait for the current transaction to finish syncing data buffers, before
1658 * tryinf to free that buffer.
1659 *
1660 * Called with journal->j_state_lock held.
1661 */
1662static void journal_wait_for_transaction_sync_data(journal_t *journal)
1663{
1664 transaction_t *transaction = NULL;
1665 tid_t tid;
1666
1667 spin_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
1668 transaction = journal->j_committing_transaction;
1669
1670 if (!transaction) {
1671 spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
1672 return;
1673 }
1674
1675 tid = transaction->t_tid;
1676 spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
1677 log_wait_commit(journal, tid);
1678}
1651 1679
1652/** 1680/**
1653 * int journal_try_to_free_buffers() - try to free page buffers. 1681 * int journal_try_to_free_buffers() - try to free page buffers.
1654 * @journal: journal for operation 1682 * @journal: journal for operation
1655 * @page: to try and free 1683 * @page: to try and free
1656 * @unused_gfp_mask: unused 1684 * @gfp_mask: we use the mask to detect how hard should we try to release
1685 * buffers. If __GFP_WAIT and __GFP_FS is set, we wait for commit code to
1686 * release the buffers.
1657 * 1687 *
1658 * 1688 *
1659 * For all the buffers on this page, 1689 * For all the buffers on this page,
@@ -1682,9 +1712,11 @@ out:
1682 * journal_try_to_free_buffer() is changing its state. But that 1712 * journal_try_to_free_buffer() is changing its state. But that
1683 * cannot happen because we never reallocate freed data as metadata 1713 * cannot happen because we never reallocate freed data as metadata
1684 * while the data is part of a transaction. Yes? 1714 * while the data is part of a transaction. Yes?
1715 *
1716 * Return 0 on failure, 1 on success
1685 */ 1717 */
1686int journal_try_to_free_buffers(journal_t *journal, 1718int journal_try_to_free_buffers(journal_t *journal,
1687 struct page *page, gfp_t unused_gfp_mask) 1719 struct page *page, gfp_t gfp_mask)
1688{ 1720{
1689 struct buffer_head *head; 1721 struct buffer_head *head;
1690 struct buffer_head *bh; 1722 struct buffer_head *bh;
@@ -1713,7 +1745,28 @@ int journal_try_to_free_buffers(journal_t *journal,
1713 if (buffer_jbd(bh)) 1745 if (buffer_jbd(bh))
1714 goto busy; 1746 goto busy;
1715 } while ((bh = bh->b_this_page) != head); 1747 } while ((bh = bh->b_this_page) != head);
1748
1716 ret = try_to_free_buffers(page); 1749 ret = try_to_free_buffers(page);
1750
1751 /*
1752 * There are a number of places where journal_try_to_free_buffers()
1753 * could race with journal_commit_transaction(), the later still
1754 * holds the reference to the buffers to free while processing them.
1755 * try_to_free_buffers() failed to free those buffers. Some of the
1756 * caller of releasepage() request page buffers to be dropped, otherwise
1757 * treat the fail-to-free as errors (such as generic_file_direct_IO())
1758 *
1759 * So, if the caller of try_to_release_page() wants the synchronous
1760 * behaviour(i.e make sure buffers are dropped upon return),
1761 * let's wait for the current transaction to finish flush of
1762 * dirty data buffers, then try to free those buffers again,
1763 * with the journal locked.
1764 */
1765 if (ret == 0 && (gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT) && (gfp_mask & __GFP_FS)) {
1766 journal_wait_for_transaction_sync_data(journal);
1767 ret = try_to_free_buffers(page);
1768 }
1769
1717busy: 1770busy:
1718 return ret; 1771 return ret;
1719} 1772}