aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/jbd
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/jbd')
-rw-r--r--fs/jbd/checkpoint.c12
-rw-r--r--fs/jbd/commit.c8
2 files changed, 10 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/fs/jbd/checkpoint.c b/fs/jbd/checkpoint.c
index 47552d4a6324..0f69c416eebc 100644
--- a/fs/jbd/checkpoint.c
+++ b/fs/jbd/checkpoint.c
@@ -602,15 +602,15 @@ int __journal_remove_checkpoint(struct journal_head *jh)
602 602
603 /* 603 /*
604 * There is one special case to worry about: if we have just pulled the 604 * There is one special case to worry about: if we have just pulled the
605 * buffer off a committing transaction's forget list, then even if the 605 * buffer off a running or committing transaction's checkpoing list,
606 * checkpoint list is empty, the transaction obviously cannot be 606 * then even if the checkpoint list is empty, the transaction obviously
607 * dropped! 607 * cannot be dropped!
608 * 608 *
609 * The locking here around j_committing_transaction is a bit sleazy. 609 * The locking here around t_state is a bit sleazy.
610 * See the comment at the end of journal_commit_transaction(). 610 * See the comment at the end of journal_commit_transaction().
611 */ 611 */
612 if (transaction == journal->j_committing_transaction) { 612 if (transaction->t_state != T_FINISHED) {
613 JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "belongs to committing transaction"); 613 JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "belongs to running/committing transaction");
614 goto out; 614 goto out;
615 } 615 }
616 616
diff --git a/fs/jbd/commit.c b/fs/jbd/commit.c
index 8f1f2aa5fb39..610264b99a8e 100644
--- a/fs/jbd/commit.c
+++ b/fs/jbd/commit.c
@@ -858,10 +858,10 @@ restart_loop:
858 } 858 }
859 spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock); 859 spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
860 /* 860 /*
861 * This is a bit sleazy. We borrow j_list_lock to protect 861 * This is a bit sleazy. We use j_list_lock to protect transition
862 * journal->j_committing_transaction in __journal_remove_checkpoint. 862 * of a transaction into T_FINISHED state and calling
863 * Really, __journal_remove_checkpoint should be using j_state_lock but 863 * __journal_drop_transaction(). Otherwise we could race with
864 * it's a bit hassle to hold that across __journal_remove_checkpoint 864 * other checkpointing code processing the transaction...
865 */ 865 */
866 spin_lock(&journal->j_state_lock); 866 spin_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
867 spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock); 867 spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);