1 files changed, 8 insertions, 12 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/zl6100.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/zl6100.c
index 48c7b4a716ae..e3e8420b7b81 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/zl6100.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/zl6100.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ enum chips { zl2004, zl2005, zl2006, zl2008, zl2105, zl2106, zl6100, zl6105 };
 struct zl6100_data {
         int id;
         ktime_t access;         /* chip access time */
+        int delay;              /* Delay between chip accesses in uS */
         struct pmbus_driver_info info;
 };
 
@@ -52,10 +53,10 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(delay, "Delay between chip accesses in uS");
 /* Some chips need a delay between accesses */
 static inline void zl6100_wait(const struct zl6100_data *data)
 {
-        if (delay) {
+        if (data->delay) {
                 s64 delta = ktime_us_delta(ktime_get(), data->access);
-                if (delta < delay)
-                        udelay(delay - delta);
+                if (delta < data->delay)
+                        udelay(data->delay - delta);
         }
 }
 
@@ -199,16 +200,11 @@ static int zl6100_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
         data->id = mid->driver_data;
 
         /*
-         * ZL2005, ZL2008, ZL2105, and ZL6100 are known to require a wait time
-         * between I2C accesses. ZL2004 and ZL6105 are known to be safe.
-         * Other chips have not yet been tested.
-         *
-         * Only clear the wait time for chips known to be safe. The wait time
-         * can be cleared later for additional chips if tests show that it
-         * is not needed (in other words, better be safe than sorry).
+         * According to information from the chip vendor, all currently
+         * supported chips are known to require a wait time between I2C
+         * accesses.
          */
-        if (data->id == zl2004 || data->id == zl6105)
-                delay = 0;
+        data->delay = delay;
 
         /*
          * Since there was a direct I2C device access above, wait before