diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/m32r/kernel/semaphore.c')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/m32r/kernel/semaphore.c | 185 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 185 deletions
diff --git a/arch/m32r/kernel/semaphore.c b/arch/m32r/kernel/semaphore.c deleted file mode 100644 index 940c2d37cfd1..000000000000 --- a/arch/m32r/kernel/semaphore.c +++ /dev/null | |||
@@ -1,185 +0,0 @@ | |||
1 | /* | ||
2 | * linux/arch/m32r/semaphore.c | ||
3 | * orig : i386 2.6.4 | ||
4 | * | ||
5 | * M32R semaphore implementation. | ||
6 | * | ||
7 | * Copyright (c) 2002 - 2004 Hitoshi Yamamoto | ||
8 | */ | ||
9 | |||
10 | /* | ||
11 | * i386 semaphore implementation. | ||
12 | * | ||
13 | * (C) Copyright 1999 Linus Torvalds | ||
14 | * | ||
15 | * Portions Copyright 1999 Red Hat, Inc. | ||
16 | * | ||
17 | * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or | ||
18 | * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License | ||
19 | * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version | ||
20 | * 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. | ||
21 | * | ||
22 | * rw semaphores implemented November 1999 by Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org> | ||
23 | */ | ||
24 | #include <linux/sched.h> | ||
25 | #include <linux/err.h> | ||
26 | #include <linux/init.h> | ||
27 | #include <asm/semaphore.h> | ||
28 | |||
29 | /* | ||
30 | * Semaphores are implemented using a two-way counter: | ||
31 | * The "count" variable is decremented for each process | ||
32 | * that tries to acquire the semaphore, while the "sleeping" | ||
33 | * variable is a count of such acquires. | ||
34 | * | ||
35 | * Notably, the inline "up()" and "down()" functions can | ||
36 | * efficiently test if they need to do any extra work (up | ||
37 | * needs to do something only if count was negative before | ||
38 | * the increment operation. | ||
39 | * | ||
40 | * "sleeping" and the contention routine ordering is protected | ||
41 | * by the spinlock in the semaphore's waitqueue head. | ||
42 | * | ||
43 | * Note that these functions are only called when there is | ||
44 | * contention on the lock, and as such all this is the | ||
45 | * "non-critical" part of the whole semaphore business. The | ||
46 | * critical part is the inline stuff in <asm/semaphore.h> | ||
47 | * where we want to avoid any extra jumps and calls. | ||
48 | */ | ||
49 | |||
50 | /* | ||
51 | * Logic: | ||
52 | * - only on a boundary condition do we need to care. When we go | ||
53 | * from a negative count to a non-negative, we wake people up. | ||
54 | * - when we go from a non-negative count to a negative do we | ||
55 | * (a) synchronize with the "sleeper" count and (b) make sure | ||
56 | * that we're on the wakeup list before we synchronize so that | ||
57 | * we cannot lose wakeup events. | ||
58 | */ | ||
59 | |||
60 | asmlinkage void __up(struct semaphore *sem) | ||
61 | { | ||
62 | wake_up(&sem->wait); | ||
63 | } | ||
64 | |||
65 | asmlinkage void __sched __down(struct semaphore * sem) | ||
66 | { | ||
67 | struct task_struct *tsk = current; | ||
68 | DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk); | ||
69 | unsigned long flags; | ||
70 | |||
71 | tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE; | ||
72 | spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags); | ||
73 | add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait); | ||
74 | |||
75 | sem->sleepers++; | ||
76 | for (;;) { | ||
77 | int sleepers = sem->sleepers; | ||
78 | |||
79 | /* | ||
80 | * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't | ||
81 | * playing, because we own the spinlock in | ||
82 | * the wait_queue_head. | ||
83 | */ | ||
84 | if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers - 1, &sem->count)) { | ||
85 | sem->sleepers = 0; | ||
86 | break; | ||
87 | } | ||
88 | sem->sleepers = 1; /* us - see -1 above */ | ||
89 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags); | ||
90 | |||
91 | schedule(); | ||
92 | |||
93 | spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags); | ||
94 | tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE; | ||
95 | } | ||
96 | remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait); | ||
97 | wake_up_locked(&sem->wait); | ||
98 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags); | ||
99 | tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING; | ||
100 | } | ||
101 | |||
102 | asmlinkage int __sched __down_interruptible(struct semaphore * sem) | ||
103 | { | ||
104 | int retval = 0; | ||
105 | struct task_struct *tsk = current; | ||
106 | DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk); | ||
107 | unsigned long flags; | ||
108 | |||
109 | tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE; | ||
110 | spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags); | ||
111 | add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait); | ||
112 | |||
113 | sem->sleepers++; | ||
114 | for (;;) { | ||
115 | int sleepers = sem->sleepers; | ||
116 | |||
117 | /* | ||
118 | * With signals pending, this turns into | ||
119 | * the trylock failure case - we won't be | ||
120 | * sleeping, and we* can't get the lock as | ||
121 | * it has contention. Just correct the count | ||
122 | * and exit. | ||
123 | */ | ||
124 | if (signal_pending(current)) { | ||
125 | retval = -EINTR; | ||
126 | sem->sleepers = 0; | ||
127 | atomic_add(sleepers, &sem->count); | ||
128 | break; | ||
129 | } | ||
130 | |||
131 | /* | ||
132 | * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't | ||
133 | * playing, because we own the spinlock in | ||
134 | * wait_queue_head. The "-1" is because we're | ||
135 | * still hoping to get the semaphore. | ||
136 | */ | ||
137 | if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers - 1, &sem->count)) { | ||
138 | sem->sleepers = 0; | ||
139 | break; | ||
140 | } | ||
141 | sem->sleepers = 1; /* us - see -1 above */ | ||
142 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags); | ||
143 | |||
144 | schedule(); | ||
145 | |||
146 | spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags); | ||
147 | tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE; | ||
148 | } | ||
149 | remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait); | ||
150 | wake_up_locked(&sem->wait); | ||
151 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags); | ||
152 | |||
153 | tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING; | ||
154 | return retval; | ||
155 | } | ||
156 | |||
157 | /* | ||
158 | * Trylock failed - make sure we correct for | ||
159 | * having decremented the count. | ||
160 | * | ||
161 | * We could have done the trylock with a | ||
162 | * single "cmpxchg" without failure cases, | ||
163 | * but then it wouldn't work on a 386. | ||
164 | */ | ||
165 | asmlinkage int __down_trylock(struct semaphore * sem) | ||
166 | { | ||
167 | int sleepers; | ||
168 | unsigned long flags; | ||
169 | |||
170 | spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags); | ||
171 | sleepers = sem->sleepers + 1; | ||
172 | sem->sleepers = 0; | ||
173 | |||
174 | /* | ||
175 | * Add "everybody else" and us into it. They aren't | ||
176 | * playing, because we own the spinlock in the | ||
177 | * wait_queue_head. | ||
178 | */ | ||
179 | if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers, &sem->count)) { | ||
180 | wake_up_locked(&sem->wait); | ||
181 | } | ||
182 | |||
183 | spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags); | ||
184 | return 1; | ||
185 | } | ||