diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/networking')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/networking/dccp.txt | 56 |
1 files changed, 56 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/dccp.txt b/Documentation/networking/dccp.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..c45daabd3bfe --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/networking/dccp.txt | |||
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ | |||
1 | DCCP protocol | ||
2 | ============ | ||
3 | |||
4 | Last updated: 10 November 2005 | ||
5 | |||
6 | Contents | ||
7 | ======== | ||
8 | |||
9 | - Introduction | ||
10 | - Missing features | ||
11 | - Socket options | ||
12 | - Notes | ||
13 | |||
14 | Introduction | ||
15 | ============ | ||
16 | |||
17 | Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) is an unreliable, connection | ||
18 | based protocol designed to solve issues present in UDP and TCP particularly | ||
19 | for real time and multimedia traffic. | ||
20 | |||
21 | It has a base protocol and pluggable congestion control IDs (CCIDs). | ||
22 | |||
23 | It is at draft RFC status and the homepage for DCCP as a protocol is at: | ||
24 | http://www.icir.org/kohler/dcp/ | ||
25 | |||
26 | Missing features | ||
27 | ================ | ||
28 | |||
29 | The DCCP implementation does not currently have all the features that are in | ||
30 | the draft RFC. | ||
31 | |||
32 | In particular the following are missing: | ||
33 | - CCID2 support | ||
34 | - feature negotiation | ||
35 | |||
36 | When testing against other implementations it appears that elapsed time | ||
37 | options are not coded compliant to the specification. | ||
38 | |||
39 | Socket options | ||
40 | ============== | ||
41 | |||
42 | DCCP_SOCKOPT_PACKET_SIZE is used for CCID3 to set default packet size for | ||
43 | calculations. | ||
44 | |||
45 | DCCP_SOCKOPT_SERVICE sets the service. This is compulsory as per the | ||
46 | specification. If you don't set it you will get EPROTO. | ||
47 | |||
48 | Notes | ||
49 | ===== | ||
50 | |||
51 | SELinux does not yet have support for DCCP. You will need to turn it off or | ||
52 | else you will get EACCES. | ||
53 | |||
54 | DCCP does not travel through NAT successfully at present. This is because | ||
55 | the checksum covers the psuedo-header as per TCP and UDP. It should be | ||
56 | relatively trivial to add Linux NAT support for DCCP. | ||