1 files changed, 111 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/block/biovecs.txt b/Documentation/block/biovecs.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..74a32ad52f53
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/block/biovecs.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+
+Immutable biovecs and biovec iterators:
+=======================================
+
+Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
+
+As of 3.13, biovecs should never be modified after a bio has been submitted.
+Instead, we have a new struct bvec_iter which represents a range of a biovec -
+the iterator will be modified as the bio is completed, not the biovec.
+
+More specifically, old code that needed to partially complete a bio would
+update bi_sector and bi_size, and advance bi_idx to the next biovec. If it
+ended up partway through a biovec, it would increment bv_offset and decrement
+bv_len by the number of bytes completed in that biovec.
+
+In the new scheme of things, everything that must be mutated in order to
+partially complete a bio is segregated into struct bvec_iter: bi_sector,
+bi_size and bi_idx have been moved there; and instead of modifying bv_offset
+and bv_len, struct bvec_iter has bi_bvec_done, which represents the number of
+bytes completed in the current bvec.
+
+There are a bunch of new helper macros for hiding the gory details - in
+particular, presenting the illusion of partially completed biovecs so that
+normal code doesn't have to deal with bi_bvec_done.
+
+ * Driver code should no longer refer to biovecs directly; we now have
+   bio_iovec() and bio_iovec_iter() macros that return literal struct biovecs,
+   constructed from the raw biovecs but taking into account bi_bvec_done and
+   bi_size.
+
+   bio_for_each_segment() has been updated to take a bvec_iter argument
+   instead of an integer (that corresponded to bi_idx); for a lot of code the
+   conversion just required changing the types of the arguments to
+   bio_for_each_segment().
+
+ * Advancing a bvec_iter is done with bio_advance_iter(); bio_advance() is a
+   wrapper around bio_advance_iter() that operates on bio->bi_iter, and also
+   advances the bio integrity's iter if present.
+
+   There is a lower level advance function - bvec_iter_advance() - which takes
+   a pointer to a biovec, not a bio; this is used by the bio integrity code.
+
+What's all this get us?
+=======================
+
+Having a real iterator, and making biovecs immutable, has a number of
+advantages:
+
+ * Before, iterating over bios was very awkward when you weren't processing
+   exactly one bvec at a time - for example, bio_copy_data() in fs/bio.c,
+   which copies the contents of one bio into another. Because the biovecs
+   wouldn't necessarily be the same size, the old code was tricky convoluted -
+   it had to walk two different bios at the same time, keeping both bi_idx and
+   and offset into the current biovec for each.
+
+   The new code is much more straightforward - have a look. This sort of
+   pattern comes up in a lot of places; a lot of drivers were essentially open
+   coding bvec iterators before, and having common implementation considerably
+   simplifies a lot of code.
+
+ * Before, any code that might need to use the biovec after the bio had been
+   completed (perhaps to copy the data somewhere else, or perhaps to resubmit
+   it somewhere else if there was an error) had to save the entire bvec array
+   - again, this was being done in a fair number of places.
+
+ * Biovecs can be shared between multiple bios - a bvec iter can represent an
+   arbitrary range of an existing biovec, both starting and ending midway
+   through biovecs. This is what enables efficient splitting of arbitrary
+   bios. Note that this means we _only_ use bi_size to determine when we've
+   reached the end of a bio, not bi_vcnt - and the bio_iovec() macro takes
+   bi_size into account when constructing biovecs.
+
+ * Splitting bios is now much simpler. The old bio_split() didn't even work on
+   bios with more than a single bvec! Now, we can efficiently split arbitrary
+   size bios - because the new bio can share the old bio's biovec.
+
+   Care must be taken to ensure the biovec isn't freed while the split bio is
+   still using it, in case the original bio completes first, though. Using
+   bio_chain() when splitting bios helps with this.
+
+ * Submitting partially completed bios is now perfectly fine - this comes up
+   occasionally in stacking block drivers and various code (e.g. md and
+   bcache) had some ugly workarounds for this.
+
+   It used to be the case that submitting a partially completed bio would work
+   fine to _most_ devices, but since accessing the raw bvec array was the
+   norm, not all drivers would respect bi_idx and those would break. Now,
+   since all drivers _must_ go through the bvec iterator - and have been
+   audited to make sure they are - submitting partially completed bios is
+   perfectly fine.
+
+Other implications:
+===================
+
+ * Almost all usage of bi_idx is now incorrect and has been removed; instead,
+   where previously you would have used bi_idx you'd now use a bvec_iter,
+   probably passing it to one of the helper macros.
+
+   I.e. instead of using bio_iovec_idx() (or bio->bi_iovec[bio->bi_idx]), you
+   now use bio_iter_iovec(), which takes a bvec_iter and returns a
+   literal struct bio_vec - constructed on the fly from the raw biovec but
+   taking into account bi_bvec_done (and bi_size).
+
+ * bi_vcnt can't be trusted or relied upon by driver code - i.e. anything that
+   doesn't actually own the bio. The reason is twofold: firstly, it's not
+   actually needed for iterating over the bio anymore - we only use bi_size.
+   Secondly, when cloning a bio and reusing (a portion of) the original bio's
+   biovec, in order to calculate bi_vcnt for the new bio we'd have to iterate
+   over all the biovecs in the new bio - which is silly as it's not needed.
+
+   So, don't use bi_vcnt anymore.