1 files changed, 29 insertions, 15 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
index 4d1f41b84ebc..6761a7b241a5 100644
--- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
+++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ not in any lower subdirectory.
 
 To create a patch for a single file, it is often sufficient to do:
 
-        SRCTREE= linux-2.4
+        SRCTREE= linux-2.6
         MYFILE=  drivers/net/mydriver.c
 
         cd $SRCTREE
@@ -48,17 +48,18 @@ To create a patch for multiple files, you should unpack a "vanilla",
 or unmodified kernel source tree, and generate a diff against your
 own source tree.  For example:
 
-        MYSRC= /devel/linux-2.4
+        MYSRC= /devel/linux-2.6
 
-        tar xvfz linux-2.4.0-test11.tar.gz
-        mv linux linux-vanilla
-        wget http://www.moses.uklinux.net/patches/dontdiff
-        diff -uprN -X dontdiff linux-vanilla $MYSRC > /tmp/patch
-        rm -f dontdiff
+        tar xvfz linux-2.6.12.tar.gz
+        mv linux-2.6.12 linux-2.6.12-vanilla
+        diff -uprN -X linux-2.6.12-vanilla/Documentation/dontdiff \
+                linux-2.6.12-vanilla $MYSRC > /tmp/patch
 
 "dontdiff" is a list of files which are generated by the kernel during
 the build process, and should be ignored in any diff(1)-generated
-patch.  dontdiff is maintained by Tigran Aivazian <tigran@veritas.com>
+patch.  The "dontdiff" file is included in the kernel tree in
+2.6.12 and later.  For earlier kernel versions, you can get it
+from <http://www.xenotime.net/linux/doc/dontdiff>.
 
 Make sure your patch does not include any extra files which do not
 belong in a patch submission.  Make sure to review your patch -after-
@@ -66,18 +67,20 @@ generated it with diff(1), to ensure accuracy.
 
 If your changes produce a lot of deltas, you may want to look into
 splitting them into individual patches which modify things in
-logical stages, this will facilitate easier reviewing by other
+logical stages.  This will facilitate easier reviewing by other
 kernel developers, very important if you want your patch accepted.
-There are a number of scripts which can aid in this;
+There are a number of scripts which can aid in this:
 
 Quilt:
 http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/quilt
 
 Randy Dunlap's patch scripts:
-http://developer.osdl.org/rddunlap/scripts/patching-scripts.tgz
+http://www.xenotime.net/linux/scripts/patching-scripts-002.tar.gz
 
 Andrew Morton's patch scripts:
-http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/patch-scripts-0.16
+http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/patch-scripts-0.20
+
+
 
 2) Describe your changes.
 
@@ -163,6 +166,8 @@ patches. Trivial patches must qualify for one of the following rules:
  since people copy, as long as it's trivial)
  Any fix by the author/maintainer of the file. (ie. patch monkey
  in re-transmission mode)
+URL: <http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/trivial/>
+
 
 
 
@@ -291,6 +296,17 @@ now, but you can do this to mark internal company procedures or just
 point out some special detail about the sign-off. 
 
 
+
+12) More references for submitting patches
+
+Andrew Morton, "The perfect patch" (tpp).
+  <http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt>
+
+Jeff Garzik, "Linux kernel patch submission format."
+  <http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html>
+
+
+
 -----------------------------------
 SECTION 2 - HINTS, TIPS, AND TRICKS
 -----------------------------------
@@ -359,7 +375,5 @@ and 'extern __inline__'.
 4) Don't over-design.
 
 Don't try to anticipate nebulous future cases which may or may not
-be useful:  "Make it as simple as you can, and no simpler"
-
-
+be useful:  "Make it as simple as you can, and no simpler."