diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/RCU/trace.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/RCU/trace.txt | 413 |
1 files changed, 413 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..068848240a8b --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt | |||
@@ -0,0 +1,413 @@ | |||
1 | CONFIG_RCU_TRACE debugfs Files and Formats | ||
2 | |||
3 | |||
4 | The rcupreempt and rcutree implementations of RCU provide debugfs trace | ||
5 | output that summarizes counters and state. This information is useful for | ||
6 | debugging RCU itself, and can sometimes also help to debug abuses of RCU. | ||
7 | Note that the rcuclassic implementation of RCU does not provide debugfs | ||
8 | trace output. | ||
9 | |||
10 | The following sections describe the debugfs files and formats for | ||
11 | preemptable RCU (rcupreempt) and hierarchical RCU (rcutree). | ||
12 | |||
13 | |||
14 | Preemptable RCU debugfs Files and Formats | ||
15 | |||
16 | This implementation of RCU provides three debugfs files under the | ||
17 | top-level directory RCU: rcu/rcuctrs (which displays the per-CPU | ||
18 | counters used by preemptable RCU) rcu/rcugp (which displays grace-period | ||
19 | counters), and rcu/rcustats (which internal counters for debugging RCU). | ||
20 | |||
21 | The output of "cat rcu/rcuctrs" looks as follows: | ||
22 | |||
23 | CPU last cur F M | ||
24 | 0 5 -5 0 0 | ||
25 | 1 -1 0 0 0 | ||
26 | 2 0 1 0 0 | ||
27 | 3 0 1 0 0 | ||
28 | 4 0 1 0 0 | ||
29 | 5 0 1 0 0 | ||
30 | 6 0 2 0 0 | ||
31 | 7 0 -1 0 0 | ||
32 | 8 0 1 0 0 | ||
33 | ggp = 26226, state = waitzero | ||
34 | |||
35 | The per-CPU fields are as follows: | ||
36 | |||
37 | o "CPU" gives the CPU number. Offline CPUs are not displayed. | ||
38 | |||
39 | o "last" gives the value of the counter that is being decremented | ||
40 | for the current grace period phase. In the example above, | ||
41 | the counters sum to 4, indicating that there are still four | ||
42 | RCU read-side critical sections still running that started | ||
43 | before the last counter flip. | ||
44 | |||
45 | o "cur" gives the value of the counter that is currently being | ||
46 | both incremented (by rcu_read_lock()) and decremented (by | ||
47 | rcu_read_unlock()). In the example above, the counters sum to | ||
48 | 1, indicating that there is only one RCU read-side critical section | ||
49 | still running that started after the last counter flip. | ||
50 | |||
51 | o "F" indicates whether RCU is waiting for this CPU to acknowledge | ||
52 | a counter flip. In the above example, RCU is not waiting on any, | ||
53 | which is consistent with the state being "waitzero" rather than | ||
54 | "waitack". | ||
55 | |||
56 | o "M" indicates whether RCU is waiting for this CPU to execute a | ||
57 | memory barrier. In the above example, RCU is not waiting on any, | ||
58 | which is consistent with the state being "waitzero" rather than | ||
59 | "waitmb". | ||
60 | |||
61 | o "ggp" is the global grace-period counter. | ||
62 | |||
63 | o "state" is the RCU state, which can be one of the following: | ||
64 | |||
65 | o "idle": there is no grace period in progress. | ||
66 | |||
67 | o "waitack": RCU just incremented the global grace-period | ||
68 | counter, which has the effect of reversing the roles of | ||
69 | the "last" and "cur" counters above, and is waiting for | ||
70 | all the CPUs to acknowledge the flip. Once the flip has | ||
71 | been acknowledged, CPUs will no longer be incrementing | ||
72 | what are now the "last" counters, so that their sum will | ||
73 | decrease monotonically down to zero. | ||
74 | |||
75 | o "waitzero": RCU is waiting for the sum of the "last" counters | ||
76 | to decrease to zero. | ||
77 | |||
78 | o "waitmb": RCU is waiting for each CPU to execute a memory | ||
79 | barrier, which ensures that instructions from a given CPU's | ||
80 | last RCU read-side critical section cannot be reordered | ||
81 | with instructions following the memory-barrier instruction. | ||
82 | |||
83 | The output of "cat rcu/rcugp" looks as follows: | ||
84 | |||
85 | oldggp=48870 newggp=48873 | ||
86 | |||
87 | Note that reading from this file provokes a synchronize_rcu(). The | ||
88 | "oldggp" value is that of "ggp" from rcu/rcuctrs above, taken before | ||
89 | executing the synchronize_rcu(), and the "newggp" value is also the | ||
90 | "ggp" value, but taken after the synchronize_rcu() command returns. | ||
91 | |||
92 | |||
93 | The output of "cat rcu/rcugp" looks as follows: | ||
94 | |||
95 | na=1337955 nl=40 wa=1337915 wl=44 da=1337871 dl=0 dr=1337871 di=1337871 | ||
96 | 1=50989 e1=6138 i1=49722 ie1=82 g1=49640 a1=315203 ae1=265563 a2=49640 | ||
97 | z1=1401244 ze1=1351605 z2=49639 m1=5661253 me1=5611614 m2=49639 | ||
98 | |||
99 | These are counters tracking internal preemptable-RCU events, however, | ||
100 | some of them may be useful for debugging algorithms using RCU. In | ||
101 | particular, the "nl", "wl", and "dl" values track the number of RCU | ||
102 | callbacks in various states. The fields are as follows: | ||
103 | |||
104 | o "na" is the total number of RCU callbacks that have been enqueued | ||
105 | since boot. | ||
106 | |||
107 | o "nl" is the number of RCU callbacks waiting for the previous | ||
108 | grace period to end so that they can start waiting on the next | ||
109 | grace period. | ||
110 | |||
111 | o "wa" is the total number of RCU callbacks that have started waiting | ||
112 | for a grace period since boot. "na" should be roughly equal to | ||
113 | "nl" plus "wa". | ||
114 | |||
115 | o "wl" is the number of RCU callbacks currently waiting for their | ||
116 | grace period to end. | ||
117 | |||
118 | o "da" is the total number of RCU callbacks whose grace periods | ||
119 | have completed since boot. "wa" should be roughly equal to | ||
120 | "wl" plus "da". | ||
121 | |||
122 | o "dr" is the total number of RCU callbacks that have been removed | ||
123 | from the list of callbacks ready to invoke. "dr" should be roughly | ||
124 | equal to "da". | ||
125 | |||
126 | o "di" is the total number of RCU callbacks that have been invoked | ||
127 | since boot. "di" should be roughly equal to "da", though some | ||
128 | early versions of preemptable RCU had a bug so that only the | ||
129 | last CPU's count of invocations was displayed, rather than the | ||
130 | sum of all CPU's counts. | ||
131 | |||
132 | o "1" is the number of calls to rcu_try_flip(). This should be | ||
133 | roughly equal to the sum of "e1", "i1", "a1", "z1", and "m1" | ||
134 | described below. In other words, the number of times that | ||
135 | the state machine is visited should be equal to the sum of the | ||
136 | number of times that each state is visited plus the number of | ||
137 | times that the state-machine lock acquisition failed. | ||
138 | |||
139 | o "e1" is the number of times that rcu_try_flip() was unable to | ||
140 | acquire the fliplock. | ||
141 | |||
142 | o "i1" is the number of calls to rcu_try_flip_idle(). | ||
143 | |||
144 | o "ie1" is the number of times rcu_try_flip_idle() exited early | ||
145 | due to the calling CPU having no work for RCU. | ||
146 | |||
147 | o "g1" is the number of times that rcu_try_flip_idle() decided | ||
148 | to start a new grace period. "i1" should be roughly equal to | ||
149 | "ie1" plus "g1". | ||
150 | |||
151 | o "a1" is the number of calls to rcu_try_flip_waitack(). | ||
152 | |||
153 | o "ae1" is the number of times that rcu_try_flip_waitack() found | ||
154 | that at least one CPU had not yet acknowledge the new grace period | ||
155 | (AKA "counter flip"). | ||
156 | |||
157 | o "a2" is the number of time rcu_try_flip_waitack() found that | ||
158 | all CPUs had acknowledged. "a1" should be roughly equal to | ||
159 | "ae1" plus "a2". (This particular output was collected on | ||
160 | a 128-CPU machine, hence the smaller-than-usual fraction of | ||
161 | calls to rcu_try_flip_waitack() finding all CPUs having already | ||
162 | acknowledged.) | ||
163 | |||
164 | o "z1" is the number of calls to rcu_try_flip_waitzero(). | ||
165 | |||
166 | o "ze1" is the number of times that rcu_try_flip_waitzero() found | ||
167 | that not all of the old RCU read-side critical sections had | ||
168 | completed. | ||
169 | |||
170 | o "z2" is the number of times that rcu_try_flip_waitzero() finds | ||
171 | the sum of the counters equal to zero, in other words, that | ||
172 | all of the old RCU read-side critical sections had completed. | ||
173 | The value of "z1" should be roughly equal to "ze1" plus | ||
174 | "z2". | ||
175 | |||
176 | o "m1" is the number of calls to rcu_try_flip_waitmb(). | ||
177 | |||
178 | o "me1" is the number of times that rcu_try_flip_waitmb() finds | ||
179 | that at least one CPU has not yet executed a memory barrier. | ||
180 | |||
181 | o "m2" is the number of times that rcu_try_flip_waitmb() finds that | ||
182 | all CPUs have executed a memory barrier. | ||
183 | |||
184 | |||
185 | Hierarchical RCU debugfs Files and Formats | ||
186 | |||
187 | This implementation of RCU provides three debugfs files under the | ||
188 | top-level directory RCU: rcu/rcudata (which displays fields in struct | ||
189 | rcu_data), rcu/rcugp (which displays grace-period counters), and | ||
190 | rcu/rcuhier (which displays the struct rcu_node hierarchy). | ||
191 | |||
192 | The output of "cat rcu/rcudata" looks as follows: | ||
193 | |||
194 | rcu: | ||
195 | 0 c=4011 g=4012 pq=1 pqc=4011 qp=0 rpfq=1 rp=3c2a dt=23301/73 dn=2 df=1882 of=0 ri=2126 ql=2 b=10 | ||
196 | 1 c=4011 g=4012 pq=1 pqc=4011 qp=0 rpfq=3 rp=39a6 dt=78073/1 dn=2 df=1402 of=0 ri=1875 ql=46 b=10 | ||
197 | 2 c=4010 g=4010 pq=1 pqc=4010 qp=0 rpfq=-5 rp=1d12 dt=16646/0 dn=2 df=3140 of=0 ri=2080 ql=0 b=10 | ||
198 | 3 c=4012 g=4013 pq=1 pqc=4012 qp=1 rpfq=3 rp=2b50 dt=21159/1 dn=2 df=2230 of=0 ri=1923 ql=72 b=10 | ||
199 | 4 c=4012 g=4013 pq=1 pqc=4012 qp=1 rpfq=3 rp=1644 dt=5783/1 dn=2 df=3348 of=0 ri=2805 ql=7 b=10 | ||
200 | 5 c=4012 g=4013 pq=0 pqc=4011 qp=1 rpfq=3 rp=1aac dt=5879/1 dn=2 df=3140 of=0 ri=2066 ql=10 b=10 | ||
201 | 6 c=4012 g=4013 pq=1 pqc=4012 qp=1 rpfq=3 rp=ed8 dt=5847/1 dn=2 df=3797 of=0 ri=1266 ql=10 b=10 | ||
202 | 7 c=4012 g=4013 pq=1 pqc=4012 qp=1 rpfq=3 rp=1fa2 dt=6199/1 dn=2 df=2795 of=0 ri=2162 ql=28 b=10 | ||
203 | rcu_bh: | ||
204 | 0 c=-268 g=-268 pq=1 pqc=-268 qp=0 rpfq=-145 rp=21d6 dt=23301/73 dn=2 df=0 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | ||
205 | 1 c=-268 g=-268 pq=1 pqc=-268 qp=1 rpfq=-170 rp=20ce dt=78073/1 dn=2 df=26 of=0 ri=5 ql=0 b=10 | ||
206 | 2 c=-268 g=-268 pq=1 pqc=-268 qp=1 rpfq=-83 rp=fbd dt=16646/0 dn=2 df=28 of=0 ri=4 ql=0 b=10 | ||
207 | 3 c=-268 g=-268 pq=1 pqc=-268 qp=0 rpfq=-105 rp=178c dt=21159/1 dn=2 df=28 of=0 ri=2 ql=0 b=10 | ||
208 | 4 c=-268 g=-268 pq=1 pqc=-268 qp=1 rpfq=-30 rp=b54 dt=5783/1 dn=2 df=32 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | ||
209 | 5 c=-268 g=-268 pq=1 pqc=-268 qp=1 rpfq=-29 rp=df5 dt=5879/1 dn=2 df=30 of=0 ri=3 ql=0 b=10 | ||
210 | 6 c=-268 g=-268 pq=1 pqc=-268 qp=1 rpfq=-28 rp=788 dt=5847/1 dn=2 df=32 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 b=10 | ||
211 | 7 c=-268 g=-268 pq=1 pqc=-268 qp=1 rpfq=-53 rp=1098 dt=6199/1 dn=2 df=30 of=0 ri=3 ql=0 b=10 | ||
212 | |||
213 | The first section lists the rcu_data structures for rcu, the second for | ||
214 | rcu_bh. Each section has one line per CPU, or eight for this 8-CPU system. | ||
215 | The fields are as follows: | ||
216 | |||
217 | o The number at the beginning of each line is the CPU number. | ||
218 | CPUs numbers followed by an exclamation mark are offline, | ||
219 | but have been online at least once since boot. There will be | ||
220 | no output for CPUs that have never been online, which can be | ||
221 | a good thing in the surprisingly common case where NR_CPUS is | ||
222 | substantially larger than the number of actual CPUs. | ||
223 | |||
224 | o "c" is the count of grace periods that this CPU believes have | ||
225 | completed. CPUs in dynticks idle mode may lag quite a ways | ||
226 | behind, for example, CPU 4 under "rcu" above, which has slept | ||
227 | through the past 25 RCU grace periods. It is not unusual to | ||
228 | see CPUs lagging by thousands of grace periods. | ||
229 | |||
230 | o "g" is the count of grace periods that this CPU believes have | ||
231 | started. Again, CPUs in dynticks idle mode may lag behind. | ||
232 | If the "c" and "g" values are equal, this CPU has already | ||
233 | reported a quiescent state for the last RCU grace period that | ||
234 | it is aware of, otherwise, the CPU believes that it owes RCU a | ||
235 | quiescent state. | ||
236 | |||
237 | o "pq" indicates that this CPU has passed through a quiescent state | ||
238 | for the current grace period. It is possible for "pq" to be | ||
239 | "1" and "c" different than "g", which indicates that although | ||
240 | the CPU has passed through a quiescent state, either (1) this | ||
241 | CPU has not yet reported that fact, (2) some other CPU has not | ||
242 | yet reported for this grace period, or (3) both. | ||
243 | |||
244 | o "pqc" indicates which grace period the last-observed quiescent | ||
245 | state for this CPU corresponds to. This is important for handling | ||
246 | the race between CPU 0 reporting an extended dynticks-idle | ||
247 | quiescent state for CPU 1 and CPU 1 suddenly waking up and | ||
248 | reporting its own quiescent state. If CPU 1 was the last CPU | ||
249 | for the current grace period, then the CPU that loses this race | ||
250 | will attempt to incorrectly mark CPU 1 as having checked in for | ||
251 | the next grace period! | ||
252 | |||
253 | o "qp" indicates that RCU still expects a quiescent state from | ||
254 | this CPU. | ||
255 | |||
256 | o "rpfq" is the number of rcu_pending() calls on this CPU required | ||
257 | to induce this CPU to invoke force_quiescent_state(). | ||
258 | |||
259 | o "rp" is low-order four hex digits of the count of how many times | ||
260 | rcu_pending() has been invoked on this CPU. | ||
261 | |||
262 | o "dt" is the current value of the dyntick counter that is incremented | ||
263 | when entering or leaving dynticks idle state, either by the | ||
264 | scheduler or by irq. The number after the "/" is the interrupt | ||
265 | nesting depth when in dyntick-idle state, or one greater than | ||
266 | the interrupt-nesting depth otherwise. | ||
267 | |||
268 | This field is displayed only for CONFIG_NO_HZ kernels. | ||
269 | |||
270 | o "dn" is the current value of the dyntick counter that is incremented | ||
271 | when entering or leaving dynticks idle state via NMI. If both | ||
272 | the "dt" and "dn" values are even, then this CPU is in dynticks | ||
273 | idle mode and may be ignored by RCU. If either of these two | ||
274 | counters is odd, then RCU must be alert to the possibility of | ||
275 | an RCU read-side critical section running on this CPU. | ||
276 | |||
277 | This field is displayed only for CONFIG_NO_HZ kernels. | ||
278 | |||
279 | o "df" is the number of times that some other CPU has forced a | ||
280 | quiescent state on behalf of this CPU due to this CPU being in | ||
281 | dynticks-idle state. | ||
282 | |||
283 | This field is displayed only for CONFIG_NO_HZ kernels. | ||
284 | |||
285 | o "of" is the number of times that some other CPU has forced a | ||
286 | quiescent state on behalf of this CPU due to this CPU being | ||
287 | offline. In a perfect world, this might neve happen, but it | ||
288 | turns out that offlining and onlining a CPU can take several grace | ||
289 | periods, and so there is likely to be an extended period of time | ||
290 | when RCU believes that the CPU is online when it really is not. | ||
291 | Please note that erring in the other direction (RCU believing a | ||
292 | CPU is offline when it is really alive and kicking) is a fatal | ||
293 | error, so it makes sense to err conservatively. | ||
294 | |||
295 | o "ri" is the number of times that RCU has seen fit to send a | ||
296 | reschedule IPI to this CPU in order to get it to report a | ||
297 | quiescent state. | ||
298 | |||
299 | o "ql" is the number of RCU callbacks currently residing on | ||
300 | this CPU. This is the total number of callbacks, regardless | ||
301 | of what state they are in (new, waiting for grace period to | ||
302 | start, waiting for grace period to end, ready to invoke). | ||
303 | |||
304 | o "b" is the batch limit for this CPU. If more than this number | ||
305 | of RCU callbacks is ready to invoke, then the remainder will | ||
306 | be deferred. | ||
307 | |||
308 | |||
309 | The output of "cat rcu/rcugp" looks as follows: | ||
310 | |||
311 | rcu: completed=33062 gpnum=33063 | ||
312 | rcu_bh: completed=464 gpnum=464 | ||
313 | |||
314 | Again, this output is for both "rcu" and "rcu_bh". The fields are | ||
315 | taken from the rcu_state structure, and are as follows: | ||
316 | |||
317 | o "completed" is the number of grace periods that have completed. | ||
318 | It is comparable to the "c" field from rcu/rcudata in that a | ||
319 | CPU whose "c" field matches the value of "completed" is aware | ||
320 | that the corresponding RCU grace period has completed. | ||
321 | |||
322 | o "gpnum" is the number of grace periods that have started. It is | ||
323 | comparable to the "g" field from rcu/rcudata in that a CPU | ||
324 | whose "g" field matches the value of "gpnum" is aware that the | ||
325 | corresponding RCU grace period has started. | ||
326 | |||
327 | If these two fields are equal (as they are for "rcu_bh" above), | ||
328 | then there is no grace period in progress, in other words, RCU | ||
329 | is idle. On the other hand, if the two fields differ (as they | ||
330 | do for "rcu" above), then an RCU grace period is in progress. | ||
331 | |||
332 | |||
333 | The output of "cat rcu/rcuhier" looks as follows, with very long lines: | ||
334 | |||
335 | c=6902 g=6903 s=2 jfq=3 j=72c7 nfqs=13142/nfqsng=0(13142) fqlh=6 | ||
336 | 1/1 0:127 ^0 | ||
337 | 3/3 0:35 ^0 0/0 36:71 ^1 0/0 72:107 ^2 0/0 108:127 ^3 | ||
338 | 3/3f 0:5 ^0 2/3 6:11 ^1 0/0 12:17 ^2 0/0 18:23 ^3 0/0 24:29 ^4 0/0 30:35 ^5 0/0 36:41 ^0 0/0 42:47 ^1 0/0 48:53 ^2 0/0 54:59 ^3 0/0 60:65 ^4 0/0 66:71 ^5 0/0 72:77 ^0 0/0 78:83 ^1 0/0 84:89 ^2 0/0 90:95 ^3 0/0 96:101 ^4 0/0 102:107 ^5 0/0 108:113 ^0 0/0 114:119 ^1 0/0 120:125 ^2 0/0 126:127 ^3 | ||
339 | rcu_bh: | ||
340 | c=-226 g=-226 s=1 jfq=-5701 j=72c7 nfqs=88/nfqsng=0(88) fqlh=0 | ||
341 | 0/1 0:127 ^0 | ||
342 | 0/3 0:35 ^0 0/0 36:71 ^1 0/0 72:107 ^2 0/0 108:127 ^3 | ||
343 | 0/3f 0:5 ^0 0/3 6:11 ^1 0/0 12:17 ^2 0/0 18:23 ^3 0/0 24:29 ^4 0/0 30:35 ^5 0/0 36:41 ^0 0/0 42:47 ^1 0/0 48:53 ^2 0/0 54:59 ^3 0/0 60:65 ^4 0/0 66:71 ^5 0/0 72:77 ^0 0/0 78:83 ^1 0/0 84:89 ^2 0/0 90:95 ^3 0/0 96:101 ^4 0/0 102:107 ^5 0/0 108:113 ^0 0/0 114:119 ^1 0/0 120:125 ^2 0/0 126:127 ^3 | ||
344 | |||
345 | This is once again split into "rcu" and "rcu_bh" portions. The fields are | ||
346 | as follows: | ||
347 | |||
348 | o "c" is exactly the same as "completed" under rcu/rcugp. | ||
349 | |||
350 | o "g" is exactly the same as "gpnum" under rcu/rcugp. | ||
351 | |||
352 | o "s" is the "signaled" state that drives force_quiescent_state()'s | ||
353 | state machine. | ||
354 | |||
355 | o "jfq" is the number of jiffies remaining for this grace period | ||
356 | before force_quiescent_state() is invoked to help push things | ||
357 | along. Note that CPUs in dyntick-idle mode thoughout the grace | ||
358 | period will not report on their own, but rather must be check by | ||
359 | some other CPU via force_quiescent_state(). | ||
360 | |||
361 | o "j" is the low-order four hex digits of the jiffies counter. | ||
362 | Yes, Paul did run into a number of problems that turned out to | ||
363 | be due to the jiffies counter no longer counting. Why do you ask? | ||
364 | |||
365 | o "nfqs" is the number of calls to force_quiescent_state() since | ||
366 | boot. | ||
367 | |||
368 | o "nfqsng" is the number of useless calls to force_quiescent_state(), | ||
369 | where there wasn't actually a grace period active. This can | ||
370 | happen due to races. The number in parentheses is the difference | ||
371 | between "nfqs" and "nfqsng", or the number of times that | ||
372 | force_quiescent_state() actually did some real work. | ||
373 | |||
374 | o "fqlh" is the number of calls to force_quiescent_state() that | ||
375 | exited immediately (without even being counted in nfqs above) | ||
376 | due to contention on ->fqslock. | ||
377 | |||
378 | o Each element of the form "1/1 0:127 ^0" represents one struct | ||
379 | rcu_node. Each line represents one level of the hierarchy, from | ||
380 | root to leaves. It is best to think of the rcu_data structures | ||
381 | as forming yet another level after the leaves. Note that there | ||
382 | might be either one, two, or three levels of rcu_node structures, | ||
383 | depending on the relationship between CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT and | ||
384 | CONFIG_NR_CPUS. | ||
385 | |||
386 | o The numbers separated by the "/" are the qsmask followed | ||
387 | by the qsmaskinit. The qsmask will have one bit | ||
388 | set for each entity in the next lower level that | ||
389 | has not yet checked in for the current grace period. | ||
390 | The qsmaskinit will have one bit for each entity that is | ||
391 | currently expected to check in during each grace period. | ||
392 | The value of qsmaskinit is assigned to that of qsmask | ||
393 | at the beginning of each grace period. | ||
394 | |||
395 | For example, for "rcu", the qsmask of the first entry | ||
396 | of the lowest level is 0x14, meaning that we are still | ||
397 | waiting for CPUs 2 and 4 to check in for the current | ||
398 | grace period. | ||
399 | |||
400 | o The numbers separated by the ":" are the range of CPUs | ||
401 | served by this struct rcu_node. This can be helpful | ||
402 | in working out how the hierarchy is wired together. | ||
403 | |||
404 | For example, the first entry at the lowest level shows | ||
405 | "0:5", indicating that it covers CPUs 0 through 5. | ||
406 | |||
407 | o The number after the "^" indicates the bit in the | ||
408 | next higher level rcu_node structure that this | ||
409 | rcu_node structure corresponds to. | ||
410 | |||
411 | For example, the first entry at the lowest level shows | ||
412 | "^0", indicating that it corresponds to bit zero in | ||
413 | the first entry at the middle level. | ||