diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/sharedsubtree.txt | 1060 |
1 files changed, 1060 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/sharedsubtree.txt b/Documentation/sharedsubtree.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..2d8f403eb6eb --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/sharedsubtree.txt | |||
| @@ -0,0 +1,1060 @@ | |||
| 1 | Shared Subtrees | ||
| 2 | --------------- | ||
| 3 | |||
| 4 | Contents: | ||
| 5 | 1) Overview | ||
| 6 | 2) Features | ||
| 7 | 3) smount command | ||
| 8 | 4) Use-case | ||
| 9 | 5) Detailed semantics | ||
| 10 | 6) Quiz | ||
| 11 | 7) FAQ | ||
| 12 | 8) Implementation | ||
| 13 | |||
| 14 | |||
| 15 | 1) Overview | ||
| 16 | ----------- | ||
| 17 | |||
| 18 | Consider the following situation: | ||
| 19 | |||
| 20 | A process wants to clone its own namespace, but still wants to access the CD | ||
| 21 | that got mounted recently. Shared subtree semantics provide the necessary | ||
| 22 | mechanism to accomplish the above. | ||
| 23 | |||
| 24 | It provides the necessary building blocks for features like per-user-namespace | ||
| 25 | and versioned filesystem. | ||
| 26 | |||
| 27 | 2) Features | ||
| 28 | ----------- | ||
| 29 | |||
| 30 | Shared subtree provides four different flavors of mounts; struct vfsmount to be | ||
| 31 | precise | ||
| 32 | |||
| 33 | a. shared mount | ||
| 34 | b. slave mount | ||
| 35 | c. private mount | ||
| 36 | d. unbindable mount | ||
| 37 | |||
| 38 | |||
| 39 | 2a) A shared mount can be replicated to as many mountpoints and all the | ||
| 40 | replicas continue to be exactly same. | ||
| 41 | |||
| 42 | Here is an example: | ||
| 43 | |||
| 44 | Lets say /mnt has a mount that is shared. | ||
| 45 | mount --make-shared /mnt | ||
| 46 | |||
| 47 | note: mount command does not yet support the --make-shared flag. | ||
| 48 | I have included a small C program which does the same by executing | ||
| 49 | 'smount /mnt shared' | ||
| 50 | |||
| 51 | #mount --bind /mnt /tmp | ||
| 52 | The above command replicates the mount at /mnt to the mountpoint /tmp | ||
| 53 | and the contents of both the mounts remain identical. | ||
| 54 | |||
| 55 | #ls /mnt | ||
| 56 | a b c | ||
| 57 | |||
| 58 | #ls /tmp | ||
| 59 | a b c | ||
| 60 | |||
| 61 | Now lets say we mount a device at /tmp/a | ||
| 62 | #mount /dev/sd0 /tmp/a | ||
| 63 | |||
| 64 | #ls /tmp/a | ||
| 65 | t1 t2 t2 | ||
| 66 | |||
| 67 | #ls /mnt/a | ||
| 68 | t1 t2 t2 | ||
| 69 | |||
| 70 | Note that the mount has propagated to the mount at /mnt as well. | ||
| 71 | |||
| 72 | And the same is true even when /dev/sd0 is mounted on /mnt/a. The | ||
| 73 | contents will be visible under /tmp/a too. | ||
| 74 | |||
| 75 | |||
| 76 | 2b) A slave mount is like a shared mount except that mount and umount events | ||
| 77 | only propagate towards it. | ||
| 78 | |||
| 79 | All slave mounts have a master mount which is a shared. | ||
| 80 | |||
| 81 | Here is an example: | ||
| 82 | |||
| 83 | Lets say /mnt has a mount which is shared. | ||
| 84 | #mount --make-shared /mnt | ||
| 85 | |||
| 86 | Lets bind mount /mnt to /tmp | ||
| 87 | #mount --bind /mnt /tmp | ||
| 88 | |||
| 89 | the new mount at /tmp becomes a shared mount and it is a replica of | ||
| 90 | the mount at /mnt. | ||
| 91 | |||
| 92 | Now lets make the mount at /tmp; a slave of /mnt | ||
| 93 | #mount --make-slave /tmp | ||
| 94 | [or smount /tmp slave] | ||
| 95 | |||
| 96 | lets mount /dev/sd0 on /mnt/a | ||
| 97 | #mount /dev/sd0 /mnt/a | ||
| 98 | |||
| 99 | #ls /mnt/a | ||
| 100 | t1 t2 t3 | ||
| 101 | |||
| 102 | #ls /tmp/a | ||
| 103 | t1 t2 t3 | ||
| 104 | |||
| 105 | Note the mount event has propagated to the mount at /tmp | ||
| 106 | |||
| 107 | However lets see what happens if we mount something on the mount at /tmp | ||
| 108 | |||
| 109 | #mount /dev/sd1 /tmp/b | ||
| 110 | |||
| 111 | #ls /tmp/b | ||
| 112 | s1 s2 s3 | ||
| 113 | |||
| 114 | #ls /mnt/b | ||
| 115 | |||
| 116 | Note how the mount event has not propagated to the mount at | ||
| 117 | /mnt | ||
| 118 | |||
| 119 | |||
| 120 | 2c) A private mount does not forward or receive propagation. | ||
| 121 | |||
| 122 | This is the mount we are familiar with. Its the default type. | ||
| 123 | |||
| 124 | |||
| 125 | 2d) A unbindable mount is a unbindable private mount | ||
| 126 | |||
| 127 | lets say we have a mount at /mnt and we make is unbindable | ||
| 128 | |||
| 129 | #mount --make-unbindable /mnt | ||
| 130 | [ smount /mnt unbindable ] | ||
| 131 | |||
| 132 | Lets try to bind mount this mount somewhere else. | ||
| 133 | # mount --bind /mnt /tmp | ||
| 134 | mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /mnt, | ||
| 135 | or too many mounted file systems | ||
| 136 | |||
| 137 | Binding a unbindable mount is a invalid operation. | ||
| 138 | |||
| 139 | |||
| 140 | 3) smount command | ||
| 141 | |||
| 142 | Currently the mount command is not aware of shared subtree features. | ||
| 143 | Work is in progress to add the support in mount ( util-linux package ). | ||
| 144 | Till then use the following program. | ||
| 145 | |||
| 146 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ||
| 147 | // | ||
| 148 | //this code was developed my Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> | ||
| 149 | //and modified by Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> | ||
| 150 | // sample usage: | ||
| 151 | // smount /tmp shared | ||
| 152 | // | ||
| 153 | #include <stdio.h> | ||
| 154 | #include <stdlib.h> | ||
| 155 | #include <unistd.h> | ||
| 156 | #include <sys/mount.h> | ||
| 157 | #include <sys/fsuid.h> | ||
| 158 | |||
| 159 | #ifndef MS_REC | ||
| 160 | #define MS_REC 0x4000 /* 16384: Recursive loopback */ | ||
| 161 | #endif | ||
| 162 | |||
| 163 | #ifndef MS_SHARED | ||
| 164 | #define MS_SHARED 1<<20 /* Shared */ | ||
| 165 | #endif | ||
| 166 | |||
| 167 | #ifndef MS_PRIVATE | ||
| 168 | #define MS_PRIVATE 1<<18 /* Private */ | ||
| 169 | #endif | ||
| 170 | |||
| 171 | #ifndef MS_SLAVE | ||
| 172 | #define MS_SLAVE 1<<19 /* Slave */ | ||
| 173 | #endif | ||
| 174 | |||
| 175 | #ifndef MS_UNBINDABLE | ||
| 176 | #define MS_UNBINDABLE 1<<17 /* Unbindable */ | ||
| 177 | #endif | ||
| 178 | |||
| 179 | int main(int argc, char *argv[]) | ||
| 180 | { | ||
| 181 | int type; | ||
| 182 | if(argc != 3) { | ||
| 183 | fprintf(stderr, "usage: %s dir " | ||
| 184 | "<rshared|rslave|rprivate|runbindable|shared|slave" | ||
| 185 | "|private|unbindable>\n" , argv[0]); | ||
| 186 | return 1; | ||
| 187 | } | ||
| 188 | |||
| 189 | fprintf(stdout, "%s %s %s\n", argv[0], argv[1], argv[2]); | ||
| 190 | |||
| 191 | if (strcmp(argv[2],"rshared")==0) | ||
| 192 | type=(MS_SHARED|MS_REC); | ||
| 193 | else if (strcmp(argv[2],"rslave")==0) | ||
| 194 | type=(MS_SLAVE|MS_REC); | ||
| 195 | else if (strcmp(argv[2],"rprivate")==0) | ||
| 196 | type=(MS_PRIVATE|MS_REC); | ||
| 197 | else if (strcmp(argv[2],"runbindable")==0) | ||
| 198 | type=(MS_UNBINDABLE|MS_REC); | ||
| 199 | else if (strcmp(argv[2],"shared")==0) | ||
| 200 | type=MS_SHARED; | ||
| 201 | else if (strcmp(argv[2],"slave")==0) | ||
| 202 | type=MS_SLAVE; | ||
| 203 | else if (strcmp(argv[2],"private")==0) | ||
| 204 | type=MS_PRIVATE; | ||
| 205 | else if (strcmp(argv[2],"unbindable")==0) | ||
| 206 | type=MS_UNBINDABLE; | ||
| 207 | else { | ||
| 208 | fprintf(stderr, "invalid operation: %s\n", argv[2]); | ||
| 209 | return 1; | ||
| 210 | } | ||
| 211 | setfsuid(getuid()); | ||
| 212 | |||
| 213 | if(mount("", argv[1], "dontcare", type, "") == -1) { | ||
| 214 | perror("mount"); | ||
| 215 | return 1; | ||
| 216 | } | ||
| 217 | return 0; | ||
| 218 | } | ||
| 219 | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
| 220 | |||
| 221 | Copy the above code snippet into smount.c | ||
| 222 | gcc -o smount smount.c | ||
| 223 | |||
| 224 | |||
| 225 | (i) To mark all the mounts under /mnt as shared execute the following | ||
| 226 | command: | ||
| 227 | |||
| 228 | smount /mnt rshared | ||
| 229 | the corresponding syntax planned for mount command is | ||
| 230 | mount --make-rshared /mnt | ||
| 231 | |||
| 232 | just to mark a mount /mnt as shared, execute the following | ||
| 233 | command: | ||
| 234 | smount /mnt shared | ||
| 235 | the corresponding syntax planned for mount command is | ||
| 236 | mount --make-shared /mnt | ||
| 237 | |||
| 238 | (ii) To mark all the shared mounts under /mnt as slave execute the | ||
| 239 | following | ||
| 240 | |||
| 241 | command: | ||
| 242 | smount /mnt rslave | ||
| 243 | the corresponding syntax planned for mount command is | ||
| 244 | mount --make-rslave /mnt | ||
| 245 | |||
| 246 | just to mark a mount /mnt as slave, execute the following | ||
| 247 | command: | ||
| 248 | smount /mnt slave | ||
| 249 | the corresponding syntax planned for mount command is | ||
| 250 | mount --make-slave /mnt | ||
| 251 | |||
| 252 | (iii) To mark all the mounts under /mnt as private execute the | ||
| 253 | following command: | ||
| 254 | |||
| 255 | smount /mnt rprivate | ||
| 256 | the corresponding syntax planned for mount command is | ||
| 257 | mount --make-rprivate /mnt | ||
| 258 | |||
| 259 | just to mark a mount /mnt as private, execute the following | ||
| 260 | command: | ||
| 261 | smount /mnt private | ||
| 262 | the corresponding syntax planned for mount command is | ||
| 263 | mount --make-private /mnt | ||
| 264 | |||
| 265 | NOTE: by default all the mounts are created as private. But if | ||
| 266 | you want to change some shared/slave/unbindable mount as | ||
| 267 | private at a later point in time, this command can help. | ||
| 268 | |||
| 269 | (iv) To mark all the mounts under /mnt as unbindable execute the | ||
| 270 | following | ||
| 271 | |||
| 272 | command: | ||
| 273 | smount /mnt runbindable | ||
| 274 | the corresponding syntax planned for mount command is | ||
| 275 | mount --make-runbindable /mnt | ||
| 276 | |||
| 277 | just to mark a mount /mnt as unbindable, execute the following | ||
| 278 | command: | ||
| 279 | smount /mnt unbindable | ||
| 280 | the corresponding syntax planned for mount command is | ||
| 281 | mount --make-unbindable /mnt | ||
| 282 | |||
| 283 | |||
| 284 | 4) Use cases | ||
| 285 | ------------ | ||
| 286 | |||
| 287 | A) A process wants to clone its own namespace, but still wants to | ||
| 288 | access the CD that got mounted recently. | ||
| 289 | |||
| 290 | Solution: | ||
| 291 | |||
| 292 | The system administrator can make the mount at /cdrom shared | ||
| 293 | mount --bind /cdrom /cdrom | ||
| 294 | mount --make-shared /cdrom | ||
| 295 | |||
| 296 | Now any process that clones off a new namespace will have a | ||
| 297 | mount at /cdrom which is a replica of the same mount in the | ||
| 298 | parent namespace. | ||
| 299 | |||
| 300 | So when a CD is inserted and mounted at /cdrom that mount gets | ||
| 301 | propagated to the other mount at /cdrom in all the other clone | ||
| 302 | namespaces. | ||
| 303 | |||
| 304 | B) A process wants its mounts invisible to any other process, but | ||
| 305 | still be able to see the other system mounts. | ||
| 306 | |||
| 307 | Solution: | ||
| 308 | |||
| 309 | To begin with, the administrator can mark the entire mount tree | ||
| 310 | as shareable. | ||
| 311 | |||
| 312 | mount --make-rshared / | ||
| 313 | |||
| 314 | A new process can clone off a new namespace. And mark some part | ||
| 315 | of its namespace as slave | ||
| 316 | |||
| 317 | mount --make-rslave /myprivatetree | ||
| 318 | |||
| 319 | Hence forth any mounts within the /myprivatetree done by the | ||
| 320 | process will not show up in any other namespace. However mounts | ||
| 321 | done in the parent namespace under /myprivatetree still shows | ||
| 322 | up in the process's namespace. | ||
| 323 | |||
| 324 | |||
| 325 | Apart from the above semantics this feature provides the | ||
| 326 | building blocks to solve the following problems: | ||
| 327 | |||
| 328 | C) Per-user namespace | ||
| 329 | |||
| 330 | The above semantics allows a way to share mounts across | ||
| 331 | namespaces. But namespaces are associated with processes. If | ||
| 332 | namespaces are made first class objects with user API to | ||
| 333 | associate/disassociate a namespace with userid, then each user | ||
| 334 | could have his/her own namespace and tailor it to his/her | ||
| 335 | requirements. Offcourse its needs support from PAM. | ||
| 336 | |||
| 337 | D) Versioned files | ||
| 338 | |||
| 339 | If the entire mount tree is visible at multiple locations, then | ||
| 340 | a underlying versioning file system can return different | ||
| 341 | version of the file depending on the path used to access that | ||
| 342 | file. | ||
| 343 | |||
| 344 | An example is: | ||
| 345 | |||
| 346 | mount --make-shared / | ||
| 347 | mount --rbind / /view/v1 | ||
| 348 | mount --rbind / /view/v2 | ||
| 349 | mount --rbind / /view/v3 | ||
| 350 | mount --rbind / /view/v4 | ||
| 351 | |||
| 352 | and if /usr has a versioning filesystem mounted, than that | ||
| 353 | mount appears at /view/v1/usr, /view/v2/usr, /view/v3/usr and | ||
| 354 | /view/v4/usr too | ||
| 355 | |||
| 356 | A user can request v3 version of the file /usr/fs/namespace.c | ||
| 357 | by accessing /view/v3/usr/fs/namespace.c . The underlying | ||
| 358 | versioning filesystem can then decipher that v3 version of the | ||
| 359 | filesystem is being requested and return the corresponding | ||
| 360 | inode. | ||
| 361 | |||
| 362 | 5) Detailed semantics: | ||
| 363 | ------------------- | ||
| 364 | The section below explains the detailed semantics of | ||
| 365 | bind, rbind, move, mount, umount and clone-namespace operations. | ||
| 366 | |||
| 367 | Note: the word 'vfsmount' and the noun 'mount' have been used | ||
| 368 | to mean the same thing, throughout this document. | ||
| 369 | |||
| 370 | 5a) Mount states | ||
| 371 | |||
| 372 | A given mount can be in one of the following states | ||
| 373 | 1) shared | ||
| 374 | 2) slave | ||
| 375 | 3) shared and slave | ||
| 376 | 4) private | ||
| 377 | 5) unbindable | ||
| 378 | |||
| 379 | A 'propagation event' is defined as event generated on a vfsmount | ||
| 380 | that leads to mount or unmount actions in other vfsmounts. | ||
| 381 | |||
| 382 | A 'peer group' is defined as a group of vfsmounts that propagate | ||
| 383 | events to each other. | ||
| 384 | |||
| 385 | (1) Shared mounts | ||
| 386 | |||
| 387 | A 'shared mount' is defined as a vfsmount that belongs to a | ||
| 388 | 'peer group'. | ||
| 389 | |||
| 390 | For example: | ||
| 391 | mount --make-shared /mnt | ||
| 392 | mount --bin /mnt /tmp | ||
| 393 | |||
| 394 | The mount at /mnt and that at /tmp are both shared and belong | ||
| 395 | to the same peer group. Anything mounted or unmounted under | ||
| 396 | /mnt or /tmp reflect in all the other mounts of its peer | ||
| 397 | group. | ||
| 398 | |||
| 399 | |||
| 400 | (2) Slave mounts | ||
| 401 | |||
| 402 | A 'slave mount' is defined as a vfsmount that receives | ||
| 403 | propagation events and does not forward propagation events. | ||
| 404 | |||
| 405 | A slave mount as the name implies has a master mount from which | ||
| 406 | mount/unmount events are received. Events do not propagate from | ||
| 407 | the slave mount to the master. Only a shared mount can be made | ||
| 408 | a slave by executing the following command | ||
| 409 | |||
| 410 | mount --make-slave mount | ||
| 411 | |||
| 412 | A shared mount that is made as a slave is no more shared unless | ||
| 413 | modified to become shared. | ||
| 414 | |||
| 415 | (3) Shared and Slave | ||
| 416 | |||
| 417 | A vfsmount can be both shared as well as slave. This state | ||
| 418 | indicates that the mount is a slave of some vfsmount, and | ||
| 419 | has its own peer group too. This vfsmount receives propagation | ||
| 420 | events from its master vfsmount, and also forwards propagation | ||
| 421 | events to its 'peer group' and to its slave vfsmounts. | ||
| 422 | |||
| 423 | Strictly speaking, the vfsmount is shared having its own | ||
| 424 | peer group, and this peer-group is a slave of some other | ||
| 425 | peer group. | ||
| 426 | |||
| 427 | Only a slave vfsmount can be made as 'shared and slave' by | ||
| 428 | either executing the following command | ||
| 429 | mount --make-shared mount | ||
| 430 | or by moving the slave vfsmount under a shared vfsmount. | ||
| 431 | |||
| 432 | (4) Private mount | ||
| 433 | |||
| 434 | A 'private mount' is defined as vfsmount that does not | ||
| 435 | receive or forward any propagation events. | ||
| 436 | |||
| 437 | (5) Unbindable mount | ||
| 438 | |||
| 439 | A 'unbindable mount' is defined as vfsmount that does not | ||
| 440 | receive or forward any propagation events and cannot | ||
| 441 | be bind mounted. | ||
| 442 | |||
| 443 | |||
| 444 | State diagram: | ||
| 445 | The state diagram below explains the state transition of a mount, | ||
| 446 | in response to various commands. | ||
| 447 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ||
| 448 | | |make-shared | make-slave | make-private |make-unbindab| | ||
| 449 | --------------|------------|--------------|--------------|-------------| | ||
| 450 | |shared |shared |*slave/private| private | unbindable | | ||
| 451 | | | | | | | | ||
| 452 | |-------------|------------|--------------|--------------|-------------| | ||
| 453 | |slave |shared | **slave | private | unbindable | | ||
| 454 | | |and slave | | | | | ||
| 455 | |-------------|------------|--------------|--------------|-------------| | ||
| 456 | |shared |shared | slave | private | unbindable | | ||
| 457 | |and slave |and slave | | | | | ||
| 458 | |-------------|------------|--------------|--------------|-------------| | ||
| 459 | |private |shared | **private | private | unbindable | | ||
| 460 | |-------------|------------|--------------|--------------|-------------| | ||
| 461 | |unbindable |shared |**unbindable | private | unbindable | | ||
| 462 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ||
| 463 | |||
| 464 | * if the shared mount is the only mount in its peer group, making it | ||
| 465 | slave, makes it private automatically. Note that there is no master to | ||
| 466 | which it can be slaved to. | ||
| 467 | |||
| 468 | ** slaving a non-shared mount has no effect on the mount. | ||
| 469 | |||
| 470 | Apart from the commands listed below, the 'move' operation also changes | ||
| 471 | the state of a mount depending on type of the destination mount. Its | ||
| 472 | explained in section 5d. | ||
| 473 | |||
| 474 | 5b) Bind semantics | ||
| 475 | |||
| 476 | Consider the following command | ||
| 477 | |||
| 478 | mount --bind A/a B/b | ||
| 479 | |||
| 480 | where 'A' is the source mount, 'a' is the dentry in the mount 'A', 'B' | ||
| 481 | is the destination mount and 'b' is the dentry in the destination mount. | ||
| 482 | |||
| 483 | The outcome depends on the type of mount of 'A' and 'B'. The table | ||
| 484 | below contains quick reference. | ||
| 485 | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
| 486 | | BIND MOUNT OPERATION | | ||
| 487 | |************************************************************************** | ||
| 488 | |source(A)->| shared | private | slave | unbindable | | ||
| 489 | | dest(B) | | | | | | ||
| 490 | | | | | | | | | ||
| 491 | | v | | | | | | ||
| 492 | |************************************************************************** | ||
| 493 | | shared | shared | shared | shared & slave | invalid | | ||
| 494 | | | | | | | | ||
| 495 | |non-shared| shared | private | slave | invalid | | ||
| 496 | *************************************************************************** | ||
| 497 | |||
| 498 | Details: | ||
| 499 | |||
| 500 | 1. 'A' is a shared mount and 'B' is a shared mount. A new mount 'C' | ||
| 501 | which is clone of 'A', is created. Its root dentry is 'a' . 'C' is | ||
| 502 | mounted on mount 'B' at dentry 'b'. Also new mount 'C1', 'C2', 'C3' ... | ||
| 503 | are created and mounted at the dentry 'b' on all mounts where 'B' | ||
| 504 | propagates to. A new propagation tree containing 'C1',..,'Cn' is | ||
| 505 | created. This propagation tree is identical to the propagation tree of | ||
| 506 | 'B'. And finally the peer-group of 'C' is merged with the peer group | ||
| 507 | of 'A'. | ||
| 508 | |||
| 509 | 2. 'A' is a private mount and 'B' is a shared mount. A new mount 'C' | ||
| 510 | which is clone of 'A', is created. Its root dentry is 'a'. 'C' is | ||
| 511 | mounted on mount 'B' at dentry 'b'. Also new mount 'C1', 'C2', 'C3' ... | ||
| 512 | are created and mounted at the dentry 'b' on all mounts where 'B' | ||
| 513 | propagates to. A new propagation tree is set containing all new mounts | ||
| 514 | 'C', 'C1', .., 'Cn' with exactly the same configuration as the | ||
| 515 | propagation tree for 'B'. | ||
| 516 | |||
| 517 | 3. 'A' is a slave mount of mount 'Z' and 'B' is a shared mount. A new | ||
| 518 | mount 'C' which is clone of 'A', is created. Its root dentry is 'a' . | ||
| 519 | 'C' is mounted on mount 'B' at dentry 'b'. Also new mounts 'C1', 'C2', | ||
| 520 | 'C3' ... are created and mounted at the dentry 'b' on all mounts where | ||
| 521 | 'B' propagates to. A new propagation tree containing the new mounts | ||
| 522 | 'C','C1',.. 'Cn' is created. This propagation tree is identical to the | ||
| 523 | propagation tree for 'B'. And finally the mount 'C' and its peer group | ||
| 524 | is made the slave of mount 'Z'. In other words, mount 'C' is in the | ||
| 525 | state 'slave and shared'. | ||
| 526 | |||
| 527 | 4. 'A' is a unbindable mount and 'B' is a shared mount. This is a | ||
| 528 | invalid operation. | ||
| 529 | |||
| 530 | 5. 'A' is a private mount and 'B' is a non-shared(private or slave or | ||
| 531 | unbindable) mount. A new mount 'C' which is clone of 'A', is created. | ||
| 532 | Its root dentry is 'a'. 'C' is mounted on mount 'B' at dentry 'b'. | ||
| 533 | |||
| 534 | 6. 'A' is a shared mount and 'B' is a non-shared mount. A new mount 'C' | ||
| 535 | which is a clone of 'A' is created. Its root dentry is 'a'. 'C' is | ||
| 536 | mounted on mount 'B' at dentry 'b'. 'C' is made a member of the | ||
| 537 | peer-group of 'A'. | ||
| 538 | |||
| 539 | 7. 'A' is a slave mount of mount 'Z' and 'B' is a non-shared mount. A | ||
| 540 | new mount 'C' which is a clone of 'A' is created. Its root dentry is | ||
| 541 | 'a'. 'C' is mounted on mount 'B' at dentry 'b'. Also 'C' is set as a | ||
| 542 | slave mount of 'Z'. In other words 'A' and 'C' are both slave mounts of | ||
| 543 | 'Z'. All mount/unmount events on 'Z' propagates to 'A' and 'C'. But | ||
| 544 | mount/unmount on 'A' do not propagate anywhere else. Similarly | ||
| 545 | mount/unmount on 'C' do not propagate anywhere else. | ||
| 546 | |||
| 547 | 8. 'A' is a unbindable mount and 'B' is a non-shared mount. This is a | ||
| 548 | invalid operation. A unbindable mount cannot be bind mounted. | ||
| 549 | |||
| 550 | 5c) Rbind semantics | ||
| 551 | |||
| 552 | rbind is same as bind. Bind replicates the specified mount. Rbind | ||
| 553 | replicates all the mounts in the tree belonging to the specified mount. | ||
| 554 | Rbind mount is bind mount applied to all the mounts in the tree. | ||
| 555 | |||
| 556 | If the source tree that is rbind has some unbindable mounts, | ||
| 557 | then the subtree under the unbindable mount is pruned in the new | ||
| 558 | location. | ||
| 559 | |||
| 560 | eg: lets say we have the following mount tree. | ||
| 561 | |||
| 562 | A | ||
| 563 | / \ | ||
| 564 | B C | ||
| 565 | / \ / \ | ||
| 566 | D E F G | ||
| 567 | |||
| 568 | Lets say all the mount except the mount C in the tree are | ||
| 569 | of a type other than unbindable. | ||
| 570 | |||
| 571 | If this tree is rbound to say Z | ||
| 572 | |||
| 573 | We will have the following tree at the new location. | ||
| 574 | |||
| 575 | Z | ||
| 576 | | | ||
| 577 | A' | ||
| 578 | / | ||
| 579 | B' Note how the tree under C is pruned | ||
| 580 | / \ in the new location. | ||
| 581 | D' E' | ||
| 582 | |||
| 583 | |||
| 584 | |||
| 585 | 5d) Move semantics | ||
| 586 | |||
| 587 | Consider the following command | ||
| 588 | |||
| 589 | mount --move A B/b | ||
| 590 | |||
| 591 | where 'A' is the source mount, 'B' is the destination mount and 'b' is | ||
| 592 | the dentry in the destination mount. | ||
| 593 | |||
| 594 | The outcome depends on the type of the mount of 'A' and 'B'. The table | ||
| 595 | below is a quick reference. | ||
| 596 | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ||
| 597 | | MOVE MOUNT OPERATION | | ||
| 598 | |************************************************************************** | ||
| 599 | | source(A)->| shared | private | slave | unbindable | | ||
| 600 | | dest(B) | | | | | | ||
| 601 | | | | | | | | | ||
| 602 | | v | | | | | | ||
| 603 | |************************************************************************** | ||
| 604 | | shared | shared | shared |shared and slave| invalid | | ||
| 605 | | | | | | | | ||
| 606 | |non-shared| shared | private | slave | unbindable | | ||
| 607 | *************************************************************************** | ||
| 608 | NOTE: moving a mount residing under a shared mount is invalid. | ||
| 609 | |||
| 610 | Details follow: | ||
| 611 | |||
| 612 | 1. 'A' is a shared mount and 'B' is a shared mount. The mount 'A' is | ||
| 613 | mounted on mount 'B' at dentry 'b'. Also new mounts 'A1', 'A2'...'An' | ||
| 614 | are created and mounted at dentry 'b' on all mounts that receive | ||
| 615 | propagation from mount 'B'. A new propagation tree is created in the | ||
| 616 | exact same configuration as that of 'B'. This new propagation tree | ||
| 617 | contains all the new mounts 'A1', 'A2'... 'An'. And this new | ||
| 618 | propagation tree is appended to the already existing propagation tree | ||
| 619 | of 'A'. | ||
| 620 | |||
| 621 | 2. 'A' is a private mount and 'B' is a shared mount. The mount 'A' is | ||
| 622 | mounted on mount 'B' at dentry 'b'. Also new mount 'A1', 'A2'... 'An' | ||
| 623 | are created and mounted at dentry 'b' on all mounts that receive | ||
| 624 | propagation from mount 'B'. The mount 'A' becomes a shared mount and a | ||
| 625 | propagation tree is created which is identical to that of | ||
| 626 | 'B'. This new propagation tree contains all the new mounts 'A1', | ||
| 627 | 'A2'... 'An'. | ||
| 628 | |||
| 629 | 3. 'A' is a slave mount of mount 'Z' and 'B' is a shared mount. The | ||
| 630 | mount 'A' is mounted on mount 'B' at dentry 'b'. Also new mounts 'A1', | ||
| 631 | 'A2'... 'An' are created and mounted at dentry 'b' on all mounts that | ||
| 632 | receive propagation from mount 'B'. A new propagation tree is created | ||
| 633 | in the exact same configuration as that of 'B'. This new propagation | ||
| 634 | tree contains all the new mounts 'A1', 'A2'... 'An'. And this new | ||
| 635 | propagation tree is appended to the already existing propagation tree of | ||
| 636 | 'A'. Mount 'A' continues to be the slave mount of 'Z' but it also | ||
| 637 | becomes 'shared'. | ||
| 638 | |||
| 639 | 4. 'A' is a unbindable mount and 'B' is a shared mount. The operation | ||
| 640 | is invalid. Because mounting anything on the shared mount 'B' can | ||
| 641 | create new mounts that get mounted on the mounts that receive | ||
| 642 | propagation from 'B'. And since the mount 'A' is unbindable, cloning | ||
| 643 | it to mount at other mountpoints is not possible. | ||
| 644 | |||
| 645 | 5. 'A' is a private mount and 'B' is a non-shared(private or slave or | ||
| 646 | unbindable) mount. The mount 'A' is mounted on mount 'B' at dentry 'b'. | ||
| 647 | |||
| 648 | 6. 'A' is a shared mount and 'B' is a non-shared mount. The mount 'A' | ||
| 649 | is mounted on mount 'B' at dentry 'b'. Mount 'A' continues to be a | ||
| 650 | shared mount. | ||
| 651 | |||
| 652 | 7. 'A' is a slave mount of mount 'Z' and 'B' is a non-shared mount. | ||
| 653 | The mount 'A' is mounted on mount 'B' at dentry 'b'. Mount 'A' | ||
| 654 | continues to be a slave mount of mount 'Z'. | ||
| 655 | |||
| 656 | 8. 'A' is a unbindable mount and 'B' is a non-shared mount. The mount | ||
| 657 | 'A' is mounted on mount 'B' at dentry 'b'. Mount 'A' continues to be a | ||
| 658 | unbindable mount. | ||
| 659 | |||
| 660 | 5e) Mount semantics | ||
| 661 | |||
| 662 | Consider the following command | ||
| 663 | |||
| 664 | mount device B/b | ||
| 665 | |||
| 666 | 'B' is the destination mount and 'b' is the dentry in the destination | ||
| 667 | mount. | ||
| 668 | |||
| 669 | The above operation is the same as bind operation with the exception | ||
| 670 | that the source mount is always a private mount. | ||
| 671 | |||
| 672 | |||
| 673 | 5f) Unmount semantics | ||
| 674 | |||
| 675 | Consider the following command | ||
| 676 | |||
| 677 | umount A | ||
| 678 | |||
| 679 | where 'A' is a mount mounted on mount 'B' at dentry 'b'. | ||
| 680 | |||
| 681 | If mount 'B' is shared, then all most-recently-mounted mounts at dentry | ||
| 682 | 'b' on mounts that receive propagation from mount 'B' and does not have | ||
| 683 | sub-mounts within them are unmounted. | ||
| 684 | |||
| 685 | Example: Lets say 'B1', 'B2', 'B3' are shared mounts that propagate to | ||
| 686 | each other. | ||
| 687 | |||
| 688 | lets say 'A1', 'A2', 'A3' are first mounted at dentry 'b' on mount | ||
| 689 | 'B1', 'B2' and 'B3' respectively. | ||
| 690 | |||
| 691 | lets say 'C1', 'C2', 'C3' are next mounted at the same dentry 'b' on | ||
| 692 | mount 'B1', 'B2' and 'B3' respectively. | ||
| 693 | |||
| 694 | if 'C1' is unmounted, all the mounts that are most-recently-mounted on | ||
| 695 | 'B1' and on the mounts that 'B1' propagates-to are unmounted. | ||
| 696 | |||
| 697 | 'B1' propagates to 'B2' and 'B3'. And the most recently mounted mount | ||
| 698 | on 'B2' at dentry 'b' is 'C2', and that of mount 'B3' is 'C3'. | ||
| 699 | |||
| 700 | So all 'C1', 'C2' and 'C3' should be unmounted. | ||
| 701 | |||
| 702 | If any of 'C2' or 'C3' has some child mounts, then that mount is not | ||
| 703 | unmounted, but all other mounts are unmounted. However if 'C1' is told | ||
| 704 | to be unmounted and 'C1' has some sub-mounts, the umount operation is | ||
| 705 | failed entirely. | ||
| 706 | |||
| 707 | 5g) Clone Namespace | ||
| 708 | |||
| 709 | A cloned namespace contains all the mounts as that of the parent | ||
| 710 | namespace. | ||
| 711 | |||
| 712 | Lets say 'A' and 'B' are the corresponding mounts in the parent and the | ||
| 713 | child namespace. | ||
| 714 | |||
| 715 | If 'A' is shared, then 'B' is also shared and 'A' and 'B' propagate to | ||
| 716 | each other. | ||
| 717 | |||
| 718 | If 'A' is a slave mount of 'Z', then 'B' is also the slave mount of | ||
| 719 | 'Z'. | ||
| 720 | |||
| 721 | If 'A' is a private mount, then 'B' is a private mount too. | ||
| 722 | |||
| 723 | If 'A' is unbindable mount, then 'B' is a unbindable mount too. | ||
| 724 | |||
| 725 | |||
| 726 | 6) Quiz | ||
| 727 | |||
| 728 | A. What is the result of the following command sequence? | ||
| 729 | |||
| 730 | mount --bind /mnt /mnt | ||
| 731 | mount --make-shared /mnt | ||
| 732 | mount --bind /mnt /tmp | ||
| 733 | mount --move /tmp /mnt/1 | ||
| 734 | |||
| 735 | what should be the contents of /mnt /mnt/1 /mnt/1/1 should be? | ||
| 736 | Should they all be identical? or should /mnt and /mnt/1 be | ||
| 737 | identical only? | ||
| 738 | |||
| 739 | |||
| 740 | B. What is the result of the following command sequence? | ||
| 741 | |||
| 742 | mount --make-rshared / | ||
| 743 | mkdir -p /v/1 | ||
| 744 | mount --rbind / /v/1 | ||
| 745 | |||
| 746 | what should be the content of /v/1/v/1 be? | ||
| 747 | |||
| 748 | |||
| 749 | C. What is the result of the following command sequence? | ||
| 750 | |||
| 751 | mount --bind /mnt /mnt | ||
| 752 | mount --make-shared /mnt | ||
| 753 | mkdir -p /mnt/1/2/3 /mnt/1/test | ||
| 754 | mount --bind /mnt/1 /tmp | ||
| 755 | mount --make-slave /mnt | ||
| 756 | mount --make-shared /mnt | ||
| 757 | mount --bind /mnt/1/2 /tmp1 | ||
| 758 | mount --make-slave /mnt | ||
| 759 | |||
| 760 | At this point we have the first mount at /tmp and | ||
| 761 | its root dentry is 1. Lets call this mount 'A' | ||
| 762 | And then we have a second mount at /tmp1 with root | ||
| 763 | dentry 2. Lets call this mount 'B' | ||
| 764 | Next we have a third mount at /mnt with root dentry | ||
| 765 | mnt. Lets call this mount 'C' | ||
| 766 | |||
| 767 | 'B' is the slave of 'A' and 'C' is a slave of 'B' | ||
| 768 | A -> B -> C | ||
| 769 | |||
| 770 | at this point if we execute the following command | ||
| 771 | |||
| 772 | mount --bind /bin /tmp/test | ||
| 773 | |||
| 774 | The mount is attempted on 'A' | ||
| 775 | |||
| 776 | will the mount propagate to 'B' and 'C' ? | ||
| 777 | |||
| 778 | what would be the contents of | ||
| 779 | /mnt/1/test be? | ||
| 780 | |||
| 781 | 7) FAQ | ||
| 782 | |||
| 783 | Q1. Why is bind mount needed? How is it different from symbolic links? | ||
| 784 | symbolic links can get stale if the destination mount gets | ||
| 785 | unmounted or moved. Bind mounts continue to exist even if the | ||
| 786 | other mount is unmounted or moved. | ||
| 787 | |||
| 788 | Q2. Why can't the shared subtree be implemented using exportfs? | ||
| 789 | |||
| 790 | exportfs is a heavyweight way of accomplishing part of what | ||
| 791 | shared subtree can do. I cannot imagine a way to implement the | ||
| 792 | semantics of slave mount using exportfs? | ||
| 793 | |||
| 794 | Q3 Why is unbindable mount needed? | ||
| 795 | |||
| 796 | Lets say we want to replicate the mount tree at multiple | ||
| 797 | locations within the same subtree. | ||
| 798 | |||
| 799 | if one rbind mounts a tree within the same subtree 'n' times | ||
| 800 | the number of mounts created is an exponential function of 'n'. | ||
| 801 | Having unbindable mount can help prune the unneeded bind | ||
| 802 | mounts. Here is a example. | ||
| 803 | |||
| 804 | step 1: | ||
| 805 | lets say the root tree has just two directories with | ||
| 806 | one vfsmount. | ||
| 807 | root | ||
| 808 | / \ | ||
| 809 | tmp usr | ||
| 810 | |||
| 811 | And we want to replicate the tree at multiple | ||
| 812 | mountpoints under /root/tmp | ||
| 813 | |||
| 814 | step2: | ||
| 815 | mount --make-shared /root | ||
| 816 | |||
| 817 | mkdir -p /tmp/m1 | ||
| 818 | |||
| 819 | mount --rbind /root /tmp/m1 | ||
| 820 | |||
| 821 | the new tree now looks like this: | ||
| 822 | |||
| 823 | root | ||
| 824 | / \ | ||
| 825 | tmp usr | ||
| 826 | / | ||
| 827 | m1 | ||
| 828 | / \ | ||
| 829 | tmp usr | ||
| 830 | / | ||
| 831 | m1 | ||
| 832 | |||
| 833 | it has two vfsmounts | ||
| 834 | |||
| 835 | step3: | ||
| 836 | mkdir -p /tmp/m2 | ||
| 837 | mount --rbind /root /tmp/m2 | ||
| 838 | |||
| 839 | the new tree now looks like this: | ||
| 840 | |||
| 841 | root | ||
| 842 | / \ | ||
| 843 | tmp usr | ||
| 844 | / \ | ||
| 845 | m1 m2 | ||
| 846 | / \ / \ | ||
| 847 | tmp usr tmp usr | ||
| 848 | / \ / | ||
| 849 | m1 m2 m1 | ||
| 850 | / \ / \ | ||
| 851 | tmp usr tmp usr | ||
| 852 | / / \ | ||
| 853 | m1 m1 m2 | ||
| 854 | / \ | ||
| 855 | tmp usr | ||
| 856 | / \ | ||
| 857 | m1 m2 | ||
| 858 | |||
| 859 | it has 6 vfsmounts | ||
| 860 | |||
| 861 | step 4: | ||
| 862 | mkdir -p /tmp/m3 | ||
| 863 | mount --rbind /root /tmp/m3 | ||
| 864 | |||
| 865 | I wont' draw the tree..but it has 24 vfsmounts | ||
| 866 | |||
| 867 | |||
| 868 | at step i the number of vfsmounts is V[i] = i*V[i-1]. | ||
| 869 | This is an exponential function. And this tree has way more | ||
| 870 | mounts than what we really needed in the first place. | ||
| 871 | |||
| 872 | One could use a series of umount at each step to prune | ||
| 873 | out the unneeded mounts. But there is a better solution. | ||
| 874 | Unclonable mounts come in handy here. | ||
| 875 | |||
| 876 | step 1: | ||
| 877 | lets say the root tree has just two directories with | ||
| 878 | one vfsmount. | ||
| 879 | root | ||
| 880 | / \ | ||
| 881 | tmp usr | ||
| 882 | |||
| 883 | How do we set up the same tree at multiple locations under | ||
| 884 | /root/tmp | ||
| 885 | |||
| 886 | step2: | ||
| 887 | mount --bind /root/tmp /root/tmp | ||
| 888 | |||
| 889 | mount --make-rshared /root | ||
| 890 | mount --make-unbindable /root/tmp | ||
| 891 | |||
| 892 | mkdir -p /tmp/m1 | ||
| 893 | |||
| 894 | mount --rbind /root /tmp/m1 | ||
| 895 | |||
| 896 | the new tree now looks like this: | ||
| 897 | |||
| 898 | root | ||
| 899 | / \ | ||
| 900 | tmp usr | ||
| 901 | / | ||
| 902 | m1 | ||
| 903 | / \ | ||
| 904 | tmp usr | ||
| 905 | |||
| 906 | step3: | ||
| 907 | mkdir -p /tmp/m2 | ||
| 908 | mount --rbind /root /tmp/m2 | ||
| 909 | |||
| 910 | the new tree now looks like this: | ||
| 911 | |||
| 912 | root | ||
| 913 | / \ | ||
| 914 | tmp usr | ||
| 915 | / \ | ||
| 916 | m1 m2 | ||
| 917 | / \ / \ | ||
| 918 | tmp usr tmp usr | ||
| 919 | |||
| 920 | step4: | ||
| 921 | |||
| 922 | mkdir -p /tmp/m3 | ||
| 923 | mount --rbind /root /tmp/m3 | ||
| 924 | |||
| 925 | the new tree now looks like this: | ||
| 926 | |||
| 927 | root | ||
| 928 | / \ | ||
| 929 | tmp usr | ||
| 930 | / \ \ | ||
| 931 | m1 m2 m3 | ||
| 932 | / \ / \ / \ | ||
| 933 | tmp usr tmp usr tmp usr | ||
| 934 | |||
| 935 | 8) Implementation | ||
| 936 | |||
| 937 | 8A) Datastructure | ||
| 938 | |||
| 939 | 4 new fields are introduced to struct vfsmount | ||
| 940 | ->mnt_share | ||
| 941 | ->mnt_slave_list | ||
| 942 | ->mnt_slave | ||
| 943 | ->mnt_master | ||
| 944 | |||
| 945 | ->mnt_share links togather all the mount to/from which this vfsmount | ||
| 946 | send/receives propagation events. | ||
| 947 | |||
| 948 | ->mnt_slave_list links all the mounts to which this vfsmount propagates | ||
| 949 | to. | ||
| 950 | |||
| 951 | ->mnt_slave links togather all the slaves that its master vfsmount | ||
| 952 | propagates to. | ||
| 953 | |||
| 954 | ->mnt_master points to the master vfsmount from which this vfsmount | ||
| 955 | receives propagation. | ||
| 956 | |||
| 957 | ->mnt_flags takes two more flags to indicate the propagation status of | ||
| 958 | the vfsmount. MNT_SHARE indicates that the vfsmount is a shared | ||
| 959 | vfsmount. MNT_UNCLONABLE indicates that the vfsmount cannot be | ||
| 960 | replicated. | ||
| 961 | |||
| 962 | All the shared vfsmounts in a peer group form a cyclic list through | ||
| 963 | ->mnt_share. | ||
| 964 | |||
| 965 | All vfsmounts with the same ->mnt_master form on a cyclic list anchored | ||
| 966 | in ->mnt_master->mnt_slave_list and going through ->mnt_slave. | ||
| 967 | |||
| 968 | ->mnt_master can point to arbitrary (and possibly different) members | ||
| 969 | of master peer group. To find all immediate slaves of a peer group | ||
| 970 | you need to go through _all_ ->mnt_slave_list of its members. | ||
| 971 | Conceptually it's just a single set - distribution among the | ||
| 972 | individual lists does not affect propagation or the way propagation | ||
| 973 | tree is modified by operations. | ||
| 974 | |||
| 975 | A example propagation tree looks as shown in the figure below. | ||
| 976 | [ NOTE: Though it looks like a forest, if we consider all the shared | ||
| 977 | mounts as a conceptual entity called 'pnode', it becomes a tree] | ||
| 978 | |||
| 979 | |||
| 980 | A <--> B <--> C <---> D | ||
| 981 | /|\ /| |\ | ||
| 982 | / F G J K H I | ||
| 983 | / | ||
| 984 | E<-->K | ||
| 985 | /|\ | ||
| 986 | M L N | ||
| 987 | |||
| 988 | In the above figure A,B,C and D all are shared and propagate to each | ||
| 989 | other. 'A' has got 3 slave mounts 'E' 'F' and 'G' 'C' has got 2 slave | ||
| 990 | mounts 'J' and 'K' and 'D' has got two slave mounts 'H' and 'I'. | ||
| 991 | 'E' is also shared with 'K' and they propagate to each other. And | ||
| 992 | 'K' has 3 slaves 'M', 'L' and 'N' | ||
| 993 | |||
| 994 | A's ->mnt_share links with the ->mnt_share of 'B' 'C' and 'D' | ||
| 995 | |||
| 996 | A's ->mnt_slave_list links with ->mnt_slave of 'E', 'K', 'F' and 'G' | ||
| 997 | |||
| 998 | E's ->mnt_share links with ->mnt_share of K | ||
| 999 | 'E', 'K', 'F', 'G' have their ->mnt_master point to struct | ||
| 1000 | vfsmount of 'A' | ||
| 1001 | 'M', 'L', 'N' have their ->mnt_master point to struct vfsmount of 'K' | ||
| 1002 | K's ->mnt_slave_list links with ->mnt_slave of 'M', 'L' and 'N' | ||
| 1003 | |||
| 1004 | C's ->mnt_slave_list links with ->mnt_slave of 'J' and 'K' | ||
| 1005 | J and K's ->mnt_master points to struct vfsmount of C | ||
| 1006 | and finally D's ->mnt_slave_list links with ->mnt_slave of 'H' and 'I' | ||
| 1007 | 'H' and 'I' have their ->mnt_master pointing to struct vfsmount of 'D'. | ||
| 1008 | |||
| 1009 | |||
| 1010 | NOTE: The propagation tree is orthogonal to the mount tree. | ||
| 1011 | |||
| 1012 | |||
| 1013 | 8B Algorithm: | ||
| 1014 | |||
| 1015 | The crux of the implementation resides in rbind/move operation. | ||
| 1016 | |||
| 1017 | The overall algorithm breaks the operation into 3 phases: (look at | ||
| 1018 | attach_recursive_mnt() and propagate_mnt()) | ||
| 1019 | |||
| 1020 | 1. prepare phase. | ||
| 1021 | 2. commit phases. | ||
| 1022 | 3. abort phases. | ||
| 1023 | |||
| 1024 | Prepare phase: | ||
| 1025 | |||
| 1026 | for each mount in the source tree: | ||
| 1027 | a) Create the necessary number of mount trees to | ||
| 1028 | be attached to each of the mounts that receive | ||
| 1029 | propagation from the destination mount. | ||
| 1030 | b) Do not attach any of the trees to its destination. | ||
| 1031 | However note down its ->mnt_parent and ->mnt_mountpoint | ||
| 1032 | c) Link all the new mounts to form a propagation tree that | ||
| 1033 | is identical to the propagation tree of the destination | ||
| 1034 | mount. | ||
| 1035 | |||
| 1036 | If this phase is successful, there should be 'n' new | ||
| 1037 | propagation trees; where 'n' is the number of mounts in the | ||
| 1038 | source tree. Go to the commit phase | ||
| 1039 | |||
| 1040 | Also there should be 'm' new mount trees, where 'm' is | ||
| 1041 | the number of mounts to which the destination mount | ||
| 1042 | propagates to. | ||
| 1043 | |||
| 1044 | if any memory allocations fail, go to the abort phase. | ||
| 1045 | |||
| 1046 | Commit phase | ||
| 1047 | attach each of the mount trees to their corresponding | ||
| 1048 | destination mounts. | ||
| 1049 | |||
| 1050 | Abort phase | ||
| 1051 | delete all the newly created trees. | ||
| 1052 | |||
| 1053 | NOTE: all the propagation related functionality resides in the file | ||
| 1054 | pnode.c | ||
| 1055 | |||
| 1056 | |||
| 1057 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ||
| 1058 | |||
| 1059 | version 0.1 (created the initial document, Ram Pai linuxram@us.ibm.com) | ||
| 1060 | version 0.2 (Incorporated comments from Al Viro) | ||
