selinux: selinux_setprocattr()->ptrace_parent() needs rcu_read_lock()

selinux_setprocattr() does ptrace_parent(p) under task_lock(p),
but task_struct->alloc_lock doesn't pin ->parent or ->ptrace,
this looks confusing and triggers the "suspicious RCU usage"
warning because ptrace_parent() does rcu_dereference_check().

And in theory this is wrong, spin_lock()->preempt_disable()
doesn't necessarily imply rcu_read_lock() we need to access
the ->parent.

Reported-by: Evan McNabb <emcnabb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index 5db26468b5c3..6625699f497c 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -5588,11 +5588,11 @@ static int selinux_setprocattr(struct task_struct *p,
                 /* Check for ptracing, and update the task SID if ok.
                    Otherwise, leave SID unchanged and fail. */
                 ptsid = 0;
-                task_lock(p);
+                rcu_read_lock();
                 tracer = ptrace_parent(p);
                 if (tracer)
                         ptsid = task_sid(tracer);
-                task_unlock(p);
+                rcu_read_unlock();
 
                 if (tracer) {
                         error = avc_has_perm(ptsid, sid, SECCLASS_PROCESS,