[NETFILTER]: Introduce NF_INET_ hook values

The IPv4 and IPv6 hook values are identical, yet some code tries to figure
out the "correct" value by looking at the address family. Introduce NF_INET_*
values for both IPv4 and IPv6. The old values are kept in a #ifndef __KERNEL__
section for userspace compatibility.

Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/security/selinux/hooks.c b/security/selinux/hooks.c
index 0396354fff95..64d414efb404 100644
--- a/security/selinux/hooks.c
+++ b/security/selinux/hooks.c
@@ -5281,7 +5281,7 @@ static struct nf_hook_ops selinux_ipv4_op = {
         .hook =         selinux_ipv4_postroute_last,
         .owner =        THIS_MODULE,
         .pf =           PF_INET,
-        .hooknum =      NF_IP_POST_ROUTING,
+        .hooknum =      NF_INET_POST_ROUTING,
         .priority =     NF_IP_PRI_SELINUX_LAST,
 };
 
@@ -5291,7 +5291,7 @@ static struct nf_hook_ops selinux_ipv6_op = {
         .hook =         selinux_ipv6_postroute_last,
         .owner =        THIS_MODULE,
         .pf =           PF_INET6,
-        .hooknum =      NF_IP6_POST_ROUTING,
+        .hooknum =      NF_INET_POST_ROUTING,
         .priority =     NF_IP6_PRI_SELINUX_LAST,
 };