security: rename ptrace_may_access => ptrace_access_check

The ->ptrace_may_access() methods are named confusingly - the real
ptrace_may_access() returns a bool, while these security checks have
a retval convention.

Rename it to ptrace_access_check, to reduce the confusion factor.

[ Impact: cleanup, no code changed ]

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
index 0023182078c7..1c9bdbcbe3d2 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ struct inode_smack *new_inode_smack(char *smack)
  */
 
 /**
- * smack_ptrace_may_access - Smack approval on PTRACE_ATTACH
+ * smack_ptrace_access_check - Smack approval on PTRACE_ATTACH
  * @ctp: child task pointer
  * @mode: ptrace attachment mode
  *
@@ -99,13 +99,13 @@ struct inode_smack *new_inode_smack(char *smack)
  *
  * Do the capability checks, and require read and write.
  */
-static int smack_ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *ctp, unsigned int mode)
+static int smack_ptrace_access_check(struct task_struct *ctp, unsigned int mode)
 {
         int rc;
         struct smk_audit_info ad;
         char *sp, *tsp;
 
-        rc = cap_ptrace_may_access(ctp, mode);
+        rc = cap_ptrace_access_check(ctp, mode);
         if (rc != 0)
                 return rc;
 
@@ -3032,7 +3032,7 @@ static void smack_release_secctx(char *secdata, u32 seclen)
 struct security_operations smack_ops = {
         .name =                         "smack",
 
-        .ptrace_may_access =            smack_ptrace_may_access,
+        .ptrace_access_check =          smack_ptrace_access_check,
         .ptrace_traceme =               smack_ptrace_traceme,
         .syslog =                       smack_syslog,