[INET]: Generalise tcp_v4_hash & tcp_unhash

It really just makes the existing code be a helper function that
tcp_v4_hash and tcp_unhash uses, specifying the right inet_hashinfo,
tcp_hashinfo.

One thing I'll investigate at some point is to have the inet_hashinfo
pointer in sk_prot, so that we get all the hashtable information from
the sk pointer, this can lead to some extra indirections that may well
hurt performance/code size, we'll see. Ultimate idea would be that
sk_prot would provide _all_ the information about a protocol
implementation.

Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 27 deletions

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index 5f9ad95304ca..dca1be67164b 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -230,37 +230,12 @@ fail:
 
 static void tcp_v4_hash(struct sock *sk)
 {
-        if (sk->sk_state != TCP_CLOSE) {
-                local_bh_disable();
-                __inet_hash(&tcp_hashinfo, sk, 1);
-                local_bh_enable();
-        }
+        inet_hash(&tcp_hashinfo, sk);
 }
 
 void tcp_unhash(struct sock *sk)
 {
-        rwlock_t *lock;
-
-        if (sk_unhashed(sk))
-                goto ende;
-
-        if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
-                local_bh_disable();
-                inet_listen_wlock(&tcp_hashinfo);
-                lock = &tcp_hashinfo.lhash_lock;
-        } else {
-                struct inet_ehash_bucket *head = &tcp_hashinfo.ehash[sk->sk_hashent];
-                lock = &head->lock;
-                write_lock_bh(&head->lock);
-        }
-
-        if (__sk_del_node_init(sk))
-                sock_prot_dec_use(sk->sk_prot);
-        write_unlock_bh(lock);
-
- ende:
-        if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN)
-                wake_up(&tcp_hashinfo.lhash_wait);
+        inet_unhash(&tcp_hashinfo, sk);
 }
 
 /* Don't inline this cruft.  Here are some nice properties to