unix/garbage: kill copy of the skb queue walker

Worse yet, it seems that its arguments were in reverse order. Also
remove one related helper which seems hardly worth keeping.

Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/net/unix/garbage.c b/net/unix/garbage.c
index 14c22c3768da..c8df6fda0b1f 100644
--- a/net/unix/garbage.c
+++ b/net/unix/garbage.c
@@ -153,15 +153,6 @@ void unix_notinflight(struct file *fp)
         }
 }
 
-static inline struct sk_buff *sock_queue_head(struct sock *sk)
-{
-        return (struct sk_buff *)&sk->sk_receive_queue;
-}
-
-#define receive_queue_for_each_skb(sk, next, skb) \
-        for (skb = sock_queue_head(sk)->next, next = skb->next; \
-             skb != sock_queue_head(sk); skb = next, next = skb->next)
-
 static void scan_inflight(struct sock *x, void (*func)(struct unix_sock *),
                           struct sk_buff_head *hitlist)
 {
@@ -169,7 +160,7 @@ static void scan_inflight(struct sock *x, void (*func)(struct unix_sock *),
         struct sk_buff *next;
 
         spin_lock(&x->sk_receive_queue.lock);
-        receive_queue_for_each_skb(x, next, skb) {
+        skb_queue_walk_safe(&x->sk_receive_queue, skb, next) {
                 /*
                  *      Do we have file descriptors ?
                  */
@@ -225,7 +216,7 @@ static void scan_children(struct sock *x, void (*func)(struct unix_sock *),
                  * and perform a scan on them as well.
                  */
                 spin_lock(&x->sk_receive_queue.lock);
-                receive_queue_for_each_skb(x, next, skb) {
+                skb_queue_walk_safe(&x->sk_receive_queue, skb, next) {
                         u = unix_sk(skb->sk);
 
                         /*