WorkStruct: Pass the work_struct pointer instead of context data

Pass the work_struct pointer to the work function rather than context data.
The work function can use container_of() to work out the data.

For the cases where the container of the work_struct may go away the moment the
pending bit is cleared, it is made possible to defer the release of the
structure by deferring the clearing of the pending bit.

To make this work, an extra flag is introduced into the management side of the
work_struct.  This governs auto-release of the structure upon execution.

Ordinarily, the work queue executor would release the work_struct for further
scheduling or deallocation by clearing the pending bit prior to jumping to the
work function.  This means that, unless the driver makes some guarantee itself
that the work_struct won't go away, the work function may not access anything
else in the work_struct or its container lest they be deallocated..  This is a
problem if the auxiliary data is taken away (as done by the last patch).

However, if the pending bit is *not* cleared before jumping to the work
function, then the work function *may* access the work_struct and its container
with no problems.  But then the work function must itself release the
work_struct by calling work_release().

In most cases, automatic release is fine, so this is the default.  Special
initiators exist for the non-auto-release case (ending in _NAR).


Signed-Off-By: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/sched.c b/net/sunrpc/sched.c
index a1ab4eed41f4..eff44bcdc95a 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/sched.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/sched.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static mempool_t	*rpc_buffer_mempool __read_mostly;
 
 static void                     __rpc_default_timer(struct rpc_task *task);
 static void                     rpciod_killall(void);
-static void                     rpc_async_schedule(void *);
+static void                     rpc_async_schedule(struct work_struct *);
 
 /*
  * RPC tasks sit here while waiting for conditions to improve.
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static void rpc_make_runnable(struct rpc_task *task)
         if (RPC_IS_ASYNC(task)) {
                 int status;
 
-                INIT_WORK(&task->u.tk_work, rpc_async_schedule, (void *)task);
+                INIT_WORK(&task->u.tk_work, rpc_async_schedule);
                 status = queue_work(task->tk_workqueue, &task->u.tk_work);
                 if (status < 0) {
                         printk(KERN_WARNING "RPC: failed to add task to queue: error: %d!\n", status);
@@ -695,9 +695,9 @@ rpc_execute(struct rpc_task *task)
         return __rpc_execute(task);
 }
 
-static void rpc_async_schedule(void *arg)
+static void rpc_async_schedule(struct work_struct *work)
 {
-        __rpc_execute((struct rpc_task *)arg);
+        __rpc_execute(container_of(work, struct rpc_task, u.tk_work));
 }
 
 /**