diff options
author | NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> | 2010-08-12 03:04:06 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> | 2010-09-07 19:22:07 -0400 |
commit | f16b6e8d838b2e2bb4561201311c66ac02ad67df (patch) | |
tree | 92c4ab62aa566029ce25989ef7dc8e3634365f63 /net/sunrpc/cache.c | |
parent | c5b29f885afe890f953f7f23424045cdad31d3e4 (diff) |
sunrpc/cache: allow threads to block while waiting for cache update.
The current practice of waiting for cache updates by queueing the
whole request to be retried has (at least) two problems.
1/ With NFSv4, requests can be quite complex and re-trying a whole
request when a later part fails should only be a last-resort, not a
normal practice.
2/ Large requests, and in particular any 'write' request, will not be
queued by the current code and doing so would be undesirable.
In many cases only a very sort wait is needed before the cache gets
valid data.
So, providing the underlying transport permits it by setting
->thread_wait,
arrange to wait briefly for an upcall to be completed (as reflected in
the clearing of CACHE_PENDING).
If the short wait was not long enough and CACHE_PENDING is still set,
fall back on the old approach.
The 'thread_wait' value is set to 5 seconds when there are spare
threads, and 1 second when there are no spare threads.
These values are probably much higher than needed, but will ensure
some forward progress.
Note that as we only request an update for a non-valid item, and as
non-valid items are updated in place it is extremely unlikely that
cache_check will return -ETIMEDOUT. Normally cache_defer_req will
sleep for a short while and then find that the item is_valid.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/sunrpc/cache.c')
-rw-r--r-- | net/sunrpc/cache.c | 59 |
1 files changed, 58 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c index 8dc121955fdc..2c5297f245b4 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c | |||
@@ -509,10 +509,22 @@ static LIST_HEAD(cache_defer_list); | |||
509 | static struct list_head cache_defer_hash[DFR_HASHSIZE]; | 509 | static struct list_head cache_defer_hash[DFR_HASHSIZE]; |
510 | static int cache_defer_cnt; | 510 | static int cache_defer_cnt; |
511 | 511 | ||
512 | struct thread_deferred_req { | ||
513 | struct cache_deferred_req handle; | ||
514 | struct completion completion; | ||
515 | }; | ||
516 | static void cache_restart_thread(struct cache_deferred_req *dreq, int too_many) | ||
517 | { | ||
518 | struct thread_deferred_req *dr = | ||
519 | container_of(dreq, struct thread_deferred_req, handle); | ||
520 | complete(&dr->completion); | ||
521 | } | ||
522 | |||
512 | static int cache_defer_req(struct cache_req *req, struct cache_head *item) | 523 | static int cache_defer_req(struct cache_req *req, struct cache_head *item) |
513 | { | 524 | { |
514 | struct cache_deferred_req *dreq, *discard; | 525 | struct cache_deferred_req *dreq, *discard; |
515 | int hash = DFR_HASH(item); | 526 | int hash = DFR_HASH(item); |
527 | struct thread_deferred_req sleeper; | ||
516 | 528 | ||
517 | if (cache_defer_cnt >= DFR_MAX) { | 529 | if (cache_defer_cnt >= DFR_MAX) { |
518 | /* too much in the cache, randomly drop this one, | 530 | /* too much in the cache, randomly drop this one, |
@@ -521,7 +533,15 @@ static int cache_defer_req(struct cache_req *req, struct cache_head *item) | |||
521 | if (net_random()&1) | 533 | if (net_random()&1) |
522 | return -ENOMEM; | 534 | return -ENOMEM; |
523 | } | 535 | } |
524 | dreq = req->defer(req); | 536 | if (req->thread_wait) { |
537 | dreq = &sleeper.handle; | ||
538 | sleeper.completion = | ||
539 | COMPLETION_INITIALIZER_ONSTACK(sleeper.completion); | ||
540 | dreq->revisit = cache_restart_thread; | ||
541 | } else | ||
542 | dreq = req->defer(req); | ||
543 | |||
544 | retry: | ||
525 | if (dreq == NULL) | 545 | if (dreq == NULL) |
526 | return -ENOMEM; | 546 | return -ENOMEM; |
527 | 547 | ||
@@ -555,6 +575,43 @@ static int cache_defer_req(struct cache_req *req, struct cache_head *item) | |||
555 | cache_revisit_request(item); | 575 | cache_revisit_request(item); |
556 | return -EAGAIN; | 576 | return -EAGAIN; |
557 | } | 577 | } |
578 | |||
579 | if (dreq == &sleeper.handle) { | ||
580 | if (wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout( | ||
581 | &sleeper.completion, req->thread_wait) <= 0) { | ||
582 | /* The completion wasn't completed, so we need | ||
583 | * to clean up | ||
584 | */ | ||
585 | spin_lock(&cache_defer_lock); | ||
586 | if (!list_empty(&sleeper.handle.hash)) { | ||
587 | list_del_init(&sleeper.handle.recent); | ||
588 | list_del_init(&sleeper.handle.hash); | ||
589 | cache_defer_cnt--; | ||
590 | spin_unlock(&cache_defer_lock); | ||
591 | } else { | ||
592 | /* cache_revisit_request already removed | ||
593 | * this from the hash table, but hasn't | ||
594 | * called ->revisit yet. It will very soon | ||
595 | * and we need to wait for it. | ||
596 | */ | ||
597 | spin_unlock(&cache_defer_lock); | ||
598 | wait_for_completion(&sleeper.completion); | ||
599 | } | ||
600 | } | ||
601 | if (test_bit(CACHE_PENDING, &item->flags)) { | ||
602 | /* item is still pending, try request | ||
603 | * deferral | ||
604 | */ | ||
605 | dreq = req->defer(req); | ||
606 | goto retry; | ||
607 | } | ||
608 | /* only return success if we actually deferred the | ||
609 | * request. In this case we waited until it was | ||
610 | * answered so no deferral has happened - rather | ||
611 | * an answer already exists. | ||
612 | */ | ||
613 | return -EEXIST; | ||
614 | } | ||
558 | return 0; | 615 | return 0; |
559 | } | 616 | } |
560 | 617 | ||