rose: Wrong list_lock argument in rose_node seqops

In rose_node_start() as well as in rose_node_stop() __acquires() and
spin_lock_bh() were wrongly passing rose_neigh_list_lock instead of
rose_node_list_lock arguments.

Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/net/rose/rose_route.c b/net/rose/rose_route.c
index 5053a53ba24f..bd593871c81e 100644
--- a/net/rose/rose_route.c
+++ b/net/rose/rose_route.c
@@ -1066,12 +1066,12 @@ out:
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
 
 static void *rose_node_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
-        __acquires(rose_neigh_list_lock)
+        __acquires(rose_node_list_lock)
 {
         struct rose_node *rose_node;
         int i = 1;
 
-        spin_lock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
+        spin_lock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock);
         if (*pos == 0)
                 return SEQ_START_TOKEN;
 
@@ -1090,9 +1090,9 @@ static void *rose_node_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 }
 
 static void rose_node_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
-        __releases(rose_neigh_list_lock)
+        __releases(rose_node_list_lock)
 {
-        spin_unlock_bh(&rose_neigh_list_lock);
+        spin_unlock_bh(&rose_node_list_lock);
 }
 
 static int rose_node_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)