mac80211: clean up some comments

Some comments refer to 80211.o or similar; also remove
a comment about implementing fragments better, we really
have better things to do.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 14 deletions

diff --git a/net/mac80211/tx.c b/net/mac80211/tx.c
index e606ba08ddd4..1bed3be01c26 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/tx.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/tx.c
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static __le16 ieee80211_duration(struct ieee80211_tx_data *tx, int group_addr,
         hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)tx->skb->data;
         if (ieee80211_is_ctl(hdr->frame_control)) {
                 /* TODO: These control frames are not currently sent by
-                 * 80211.o, but should they be implemented, this function
+                 * mac80211, but should they be implemented, this function
                  * needs to be updated to support duration field calculation.
                  *
                  * RTS: time needed to transmit pending data/mgmt frame plus
@@ -1580,19 +1580,6 @@ int ieee80211_subif_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
         nh_pos -= skip_header_bytes;
         h_pos -= skip_header_bytes;
 
-        /* TODO: implement support for fragments so that there is no need to
-         * reallocate and copy payload; it might be enough to support one
-         * extra fragment that would be copied in the beginning of the frame
-         * data.. anyway, it would be nice to include this into skb structure
-         * somehow
-         *
-         * There are few options for this:
-         * use skb->cb as an extra space for 802.11 header
-         * allocate new buffer if not enough headroom
-         * make sure that there is enough headroom in every skb by increasing
-         * build in headroom in __dev_alloc_skb() (linux/skbuff.h) and
-         * alloc_skb() (net/core/skbuff.c)
-         */
         head_need = hdrlen + encaps_len + meshhdrlen - skb_headroom(skb);
 
         /*