[NET]: Add NETIF_F_GEN_CSUM and NETIF_F_ALL_CSUM

The current stack treats NETIF_F_HW_CSUM and NETIF_F_NO_CSUM
identically so we test for them in quite a few places.  For the sake
of brevity, I'm adding the macro NETIF_F_GEN_CSUM for these two.  We
also test the disjunct of NETIF_F_IP_CSUM and the other two in various
places, for that purpose I've added NETIF_F_ALL_CSUM.

Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index ff6ccda9ff46..74998f250071 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -622,14 +622,10 @@ ssize_t tcp_sendpage(struct socket *sock, struct page *page, int offset,
         ssize_t res;
         struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
 
-#define TCP_ZC_CSUM_FLAGS (NETIF_F_IP_CSUM | NETIF_F_NO_CSUM | NETIF_F_HW_CSUM)
-
         if (!(sk->sk_route_caps & NETIF_F_SG) ||
-            !(sk->sk_route_caps & TCP_ZC_CSUM_FLAGS))
+            !(sk->sk_route_caps & NETIF_F_ALL_CSUM))
                 return sock_no_sendpage(sock, page, offset, size, flags);
 
-#undef TCP_ZC_CSUM_FLAGS
-
         lock_sock(sk);
         TCP_CHECK_TIMER(sk);
         res = do_tcp_sendpages(sk, &page, offset, size, flags);
@@ -726,9 +722,7 @@ new_segment:
                                 /*
                                  * Check whether we can use HW checksum.
                                  */
-                                if (sk->sk_route_caps &
-                                    (NETIF_F_IP_CSUM | NETIF_F_NO_CSUM |
-                                     NETIF_F_HW_CSUM))
+                                if (sk->sk_route_caps & NETIF_F_ALL_CSUM)
                                         skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_HW;
 
                                 skb_entail(sk, tp, skb);